The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
KrossBooking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 292 | 0 |
在分析了 292 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成,而 KrossBooking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and KrossBooking by KrossBooking hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both aim to streamline operations, increase bookings, and improve efficiency, but innRoad offers a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive reviews and recent validation. KrossBooking, with no reviews or recent data, remains unproven for your property. Does your property require an established system backed by thousands of users, or are you open to exploring a less-tested platform?
innRoad’s longstanding presence and comprehensive feature set make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. KrossBooking’s lack of review data means you’d be relying on promises rather than proven performance. Are you comfortable betting on an unreviewed system versus a platform with verified satisfaction from hundreds of users?
If your hotel needs a mature property management system with strong regional presence, extensive integrations, and proven results, go with innRoad. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking a flexible, all-in-one platform with a track record of increasing revenue and occupancy.
If your hotel is a small operation or a vacation rental that prioritizes simplicity, or if you’re looking for a newer platform that might offer fresh features, KrossBooking could appeal — but keep in mind there’s no review data to support this. For most hotels, innRoad’s extensive review count and recent positive feedback make it the safer bet.
innRoad boasts a high user rating of 4.49/5 for ease of use, supported by 238 reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and efficient onboarding process. Users frequently mention the Tape Chart as a visual, easy-to-manage feature that simplifies reservations.
KrossBooking, with no reviews, offers no data to gauge user friendliness, making it impossible to determine its ease of use confidently. Its lack of recent validation leaves hoteliers uncertain about how well it integrates into daily operations.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad has 56 exclusive features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and integrated ID scanners. These features address complex operational needs and improve guest experience.
KrossBooking, with no unique features listed and no integrations, appears to lack the breadth of innRoad’s offering. Without detailed feature data, innRoad’s feature set clearly surpasses the minimal info available for KrossBooking.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad scores 4.54/5 on support, with reviews emphasizing its 24/7 live customer service and dedicated onboarding. Customers frequently cite their support team’s professionalism and responsiveness, describing it as a key advantage.
KrossBooking has no reviews or data on support quality, leaving its support effectiveness uncertain. Without user feedback, innRoad’s proven support system delivers confidence for your team.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including QuickBooks, Revinate, RateGain, and various OTAs, facilitating smooth operation across multiple platforms. These integrations help automate workflows and provide comprehensive control.
KrossBooking has no listed integrations or verified partner data, suggesting a limited or unverified integration ecosystem. innRoad’s extensive partner network gives it a clear advantage in connecting with your existing tools.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s overall rating of 4.7/5 is based on 238 reviews, with recent feedback confirming high satisfaction, especially among boutique, motels, and resort properties. Users frequently mention its ease of use, support quality, and revenue impact.
KrossBooking’s rating is nonexistent, with no reviews to evaluate property segment performance. For proven satisfaction across different hotel types, innRoad leads.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a base price of $300 per month, with no hidden fees, implementation costs, or trial options. Its transparent pricing and no-upcharge policy simplify budgeting.
KrossBooking’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to assess value or compare costs. innRoad’s known pricing structure offers clarity and predictability for your financial planning.
Edge: innRoad.
Not ideal if you seek a simple, minimal solution with basic booking functions only. Small operations with very limited needs may find innRoad overly complex.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, extensive integrations, or proven support. Larger or more complex properties should avoid the lack of review data associated with KrossBooking.
innRoad offers an extensively validated PMS with a 4.7-star rating and nearly 240 recent reviews, ensuring confidence in its performance. Its feature set, support, and integrations have been consistently praised, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types.
KrossBooking’s absence of reviews and data makes it a risky choice, especially for hotels seeking proven results. Without verified user feedback, it’s difficult to recommend it over the established, well-rated innRoad platform.
If your hotel needs a trusted, comprehensive property management system, innRoad remains the clear choice. For those eager to try a less proven platform, KrossBooking might be worth exploring, but only with caution.
In summary, innRoad’s extensive validation and proven track record make it the safest bet. Its broad feature set, strong support, and high user satisfaction ensure your team can manage operations confidently and grow revenue.
Choosing innRoad means choosing a platform backed by real users, recent reviews, and a history of delivering results. KrossBooking’s lack of data leaves your decision uncertain—unless you’re willing to take a significant risk on an untested system.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
KrossBooking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,innRoad 和 KrossBooking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 44 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 KrossBooking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 KrossBooking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。KrossBooking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,KrossBooking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问