The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between innRoad and Lodgable hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. innRoad offers a feature-rich, globally recognized PMS with extensive integrations and a proven track record, while Lodgable provides a straightforward solution tailored primarily for vacation rentals and smaller properties. Your decision should consider not only current functionality but also growth plans and regional presence.
innRoad's comprehensive platform is designed to boost revenue and streamline operations across various property types, but Lodgable's simplicity might appeal if your focus is on managing multiple listings efficiently. With more recent reviews and a significantly higher review count, innRoad's stronger market presence makes it the more reliable choice for serious hoteliers.
Both innRoad and Lodgable aim to simplify property management; however, they diverge significantly in scope and target audiences. innRoad provides an extensive array of features, including channel management, revenue tools, and a booking engine, all tailored for hotels ranging from boutique to larger properties. In contrast, Lodgable centers on vacation rentals, emphasizing listing management, guest communication, and automation.
While innRoad's 238 reviews over the past six months establish its position as a mature platform, Lodgable has no recent reviews, making innRoad the clearer choice for hotels wanting current, trustworthy feedback. Are you looking for a multi-property system with a broad feature set, or a rental-specific platform that offers straightforward listing management?
If your hotel needs a scalable, full-spectrum PMS capable of managing multiple channels, guest profiles, revenue, and reporting, innRoad is the recommended option. Its robust features cater to a diverse hotel portfolio, and the recent reviews praise its ease of use, live support, and measurable revenue improvements.
However, if your property primarily operates as a vacation rental or short-term rental listing, and you seek simple automation for reservations, guest messaging, and platform syncing, Lodgable could suffice. Still, given the lack of recent reviews and limited feature scope, innRoad is the more dependable choice for hotels aiming for growth and stability.
innRoad's user interface has an average ease-of-use score of 4.49/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive Tape Chart and straightforward reservation workflows. The onboarding process is rated at 4.28/5, supported by 24/7 live support and dedicated advisors, making staff adoption smoother despite some initial learning curves.
Lodgable's interface, although not rated explicitly, is described as user-friendly and simplified for managing multiple listings. However, with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, it’s difficult to compare directly. Given innRoad’s consistent positive feedback on ease of use, edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 56 unique features, covering everything from multi-currency support, channel management, booking engines, revenue tools, and integrated guest communication. Features like online check-in, automated night audits, property-specific reports, and PCI compliance are included, making it a comprehensive PMS.
Lodgable offers a core set of automation tools for vacation rentals, focusing on listing management, guest communication, and synchronization across booking platforms. It does not provide the extensive feature set innRoad does. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad's support ratings average 4.54/5, with reviews praising its 24/7 live support and attentive onboarding. Review quotes mention prompt, professional help and ongoing assistance, although some users note occasional delays in resolving glitches.
Lodgable has no recent reviews or detailed customer support ratings available, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. innRoad's consistent positive feedback clearly gives it the edge here.
innRoad supports integration with 34 verified partners, including major booking engines, POS systems, and financial tools like QuickBooks. It also connects with OTAs directly, streamlining distribution and accounting workflows.
Lodgable currently has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with third-party services. For hotels needing extensive integration options, innRoad is the superior choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad's overall rating of 4.7/5 comes from 238 recent reviews, with high satisfaction across all categories. Hotels of various sizes, particularly boutique and motels, rate innRoad highly, citing ease of use, support, and revenue increases.
Lodgable has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, innRoad's ratings and review volume establish it as the preferred platform for hoteliers seeking proven performance. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a flat $300 monthly fee with no implementation or hidden charges, offering a clear, predictable pricing model. Lodgable's pricing details are not publicly available, which could pose challenges for budgeting and comparison.
Given innRoad’s transparent pricing and proven ROI, it provides more confidence in value for money. Lodgable’s lack of pricing data limits its competitiveness.
Not ideal if you operate a small, single-property vacation rental looking for minimal management tools or a highly budget-conscious business.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive revenue tools, detailed reporting, or integration with a broad set of third-party services.
innRoad’s core advantage is its extensive feature set, proven support, and scalability, making it suitable for hotels of various sizes aiming for operational growth. Its recent reviews attest to its ability to improve revenue and streamline multi-property management.
Lodgable offers a simplified, listing-centric platform tailored for vacation rentals and small-scale operators, but its limited recent reviews and lack of integrations hinder confidence for larger or more complex properties.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with proven results, innRoad is the clear choice. If your focus is on managing a handful of listings with minimal complexity, Lodgable might suffice—but with less certainty about ongoing support and features.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Lodgable:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问