The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 292 | 0 |
在分析了 292 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成,而 Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel's operations and revenue. innRoad by innRoad and Oasis PMS by Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd both aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in user feedback, feature sets, and market presence. Your decision will hinge on whether you prioritize a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive reviews or a less established solution with limited data.
innRoad’s extensive review base and recent feedback make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a proven system. Oasis PMS, despite being newer, lacks recent reviews and user feedback, making it harder to assess its real-world performance. So, which system truly fits your hotel's needs?
innRoad provides a comprehensive cloud-based PMS tailored for a wide range of hotel types, from boutique properties to resorts. Oasis PMS is positioned as an all-in-one management tool but lacks recent user reviews to verify its performance.
innRoad's core strength lies in its feature depth, with over 56 unique functionalities, including a booking engine, channel management, revenue tools, and integrated payments. Oasis PMS does not specify feature counts but emphasizes streamlining operations through a centralized interface. Given innRoad’s 238 recent reviews and 4.7/5 rating, it's evident that many hoteliers trust its capabilities.
In contrast, Oasis PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its effectiveness uncertain. InnRoad’s users consistently praise its ease of use, support, and tangible revenue gains, whereas Oasis PMS’s value is unverified.
Are you comfortable adopting a system with proven results or willing to risk less data?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive support, innRoad is the clear choice. Its broad features, positive reviews, and long-standing market presence make it suitable for properties that want reliable technology, especially those looking to boost direct bookings and streamline operations.
On the other hand, Oasis PMS might appeal to smaller hotels or resorts that prefer a simplified, centralized management system but lack recent user feedback. If your hotel prioritizes a potentially customizable or niche solution without current validation, Oasis could be considered—but only with caution.
For hoteliers prioritizing a system proven to increase revenue and operational efficiency, innRoad’s track record and high review scores tip the scale. Oasis PMS remains unverified in recent user experience, making it a risky choice for now.
innRoad boasts a user rating of 4.49/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Customers highlight its visual Tape Chart, which simplifies reservation management, and mention that staff adoption is smooth, supported by 24/7 live support.
Oasis PMS, lacking recent reviews, provides no clear data about its usability or onboarding experience. Its website emphasizes centralization but fails to deliver user feedback that confirms whether hoteliers find it easier to adopt.
Given innRoad’s high usability ratings and positive real-user comments, it clearly offers a more user-friendly experience. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 56 distinct features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, gift vouchers, integrated payments, housecleaning modules, online check-in/out, guest communication, and mobile optimization. These features cater to a broad spectrum of operational needs.
Oasis PMS does not specify its features or count, making it hard to compare directly. Its value proposition appears to focus on streamlining operations within a centralized platform, but with no detailed feature list or unique functionalities.
Based on available data, innRoad’s extensive feature set and proven integrations give it a decisive edge. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s customer support scores 4.54/5, with reviews praising its 24/7 live support and dedicated onboarding. Users describe support as prompt, professional, and essential in resolving glitches and onboarding new properties.
Oasis PMS has no recent reviews or customer support ratings available, leaving its support quality unverified. Without recent user feedback, assessing its support responsiveness or effectiveness is impossible.
innRoad’s established reputation and high support rating make it the safer choice for hoteliers who depend on timely assistance. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, and ancillary vendors like Quickbooks, Revinate, and Impulsify. Its extensive partner network supports seamless operations across multiple platforms.
Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd offers only 7 verified integrations, including some industry players like D-Edge and Duetto, but significantly fewer than innRoad.
For hotels seeking a broad, tested integration ecosystem, innRoad’s superior partner count ensures more flexibility and connectivity. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s recent reviews consistently rate it 4.7/5 across 238 reviews, with an 89% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers from varied segments, including boutique hotels and resorts, praise its ease of use, support, and revenue impact.
Oasis PMS has no available recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Given the volume and recency of innRoad reviews, it’s clear that hoteliers rate this system highly. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee with no hidden charges or implementation fees. There’s no mention of additional costs for setup, training, or support.
Oasis PMS’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; no data on subscription fees, setup costs, or ongoing expenses is available.
While innRoad’s transparent pricing adds to its appeal, the lack of data on Oasis PMS’s costs means you should inquire directly if considering Oasis. For now, innRoad’s clear pricing favors its purchase decision.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small with minimal management needs, or if you prefer a system with unverified recent user feedback.
Not ideal if you require a proven system with broad support and extensive feature sets, or if recent user reviews are essential.
innRoad offers an established, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, extensive reviews, and high user satisfaction. Its strengths lie in ease of use, support, integrations, and measurable revenue improvements.
Oasis PMS, while positioned as a comprehensive solution, currently lacks recent reviews or verified user feedback, making its real-world performance uncertain. Without recent validation, it’s difficult to recommend Oasis over innRoad confidently.
For hoteliers seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS that can boost operational efficiency and revenue, innRoad is the clear choice. If your hotel is smaller, or you’re willing to explore less proven options, Oasis might be worth consideration—but only with caution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,innRoad 和 Oasis PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 44 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Oasis PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oasis PMS 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Oasis PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问