The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 350 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成, 磁带图,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进, 直接 ota 连接。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
+
认证过程
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #14 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue growth. innRoad by innRoad and OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel are two leading options that aim to streamline your management tasks, increase bookings, and improve guest experiences. While both serve similar functions, their strengths, feature sets, and customer support differ significantly. Given their review counts and recent feedback, innRoad’s larger user base and more current reviews make it the more reliable choice for your hotel.
innRoad and OpenHotel both provide core PMS features such as reservation management, channel integration, and reporting, but their approaches vary. innRoad emphasizes a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a strong focus on revenue management, OTA connections, and automation tools, while OpenHotel offers an intuitive interface with excellent customer support and a solid suite of basic property management functions. Recent reviews favor innRoad’s larger ecosystem and more active development, but OpenHotel’s ease of use remains a key advantage. Are you prioritizing a feature-heavy system or a simpler, user-friendly platform?
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one PMS capable of handling complex operations, innRoad is the better fit. It’s ideal for properties that want extensive automation, multi-currency support, and integration with over 34 partners, including revenue management and guest CRM features. Conversely, if your focus is on a straightforward system with excellent customer support and strong OTA integration, OpenHotel suits small to medium hotels that value ease of use and reliable service. The choice depends on whether your property requires deep functionality or simplicity.
innRoad boasts a 4.49/5 ease-of-use rating based on 238 reviews, with users praising its intuitive Tape Chart and reservation flow, though some note glitches and occasional sluggishness. OpenHotel scores slightly higher at 4.71/5, with many users highlighting its straightforward interface and seamless onboarding, backed by excellent customer support. Recent reviews indicate OpenHotel maintains a more positive user experience, especially for staff new to PMS software. Edge: OpenHotel.
innRoad offers a wider array of features—36 exclusive to it—including a built-in booking engine, group booking tools, revenue management, and a native guest messaging system. OpenHotel provides only 3 features unique to it, such as EPoS and native email marketing, but its core offerings cover essential PMS functions efficiently. innRoad’s comprehensive suite supports more complex operations, while OpenHotel focuses on ease and core management. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad's support scores a 4.54/5, with reviews praising its 24/7 live support but citing some delays and system glitches. OpenHotel shines with a 4.82/5 rating, with hoteliers emphasizing its personal, responsive service and highly available support team, often referenced as a key reason for loyalty. Recent feedback indicates OpenHotel’s customer service consistently exceeds expectations. Edge: OpenHotel.
innRoad connects with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, and revenue tools like QuickBooks, Revinate, and Oracle Hospitality—far more than OpenHotel’s 12, with notable integrations like SiteMinder and OpenKey. Both platforms share six partners, but innRoad’s broader network supports more seamless third-party connections. If extensive integrations are critical, innRoad has the edge.
innRoad’s overall rating is 4.7/5 based on 238 reviews, with a recent NPS of 8.82/10. It’s especially favored by boutique and motel properties, which give it strong scores for reliability and features. OpenHotel’s rating is slightly higher at 4.81/5, with a 9.53/10 NPS, and customers of small hotels and inns frequently praise its support and ease of use. Given the larger review base and recent feedback, innRoad's reputation is more grounded, but OpenHotel’s recent reviews affirm its high satisfaction levels.
innRoad charges a $300/month flat fee, with no implementation or hidden charges, positioning it as a predictable investment for mid-sized properties. OpenHotel does not publicly disclose pricing, but its model suggests a similar subscription-based approach, likely with customizable plans. Exact costs may depend on property size and required features, so direct quotes are advisable for a complete comparison.
innRoad is a comprehensive PMS tailored for properties that need a versatile, feature-packed system capable of handling complex operations and increasing revenue through automation. It is best suited for larger or more technologically sophisticated hotels that want extensive integrations and advanced management tools.
OpenHotel offers a more streamlined experience, focusing on ease of use, strong customer support, and essential property management features. It’s ideal for small to medium hotels that prioritize simplicity, reliable service, and quick onboarding.
If your hotel demands a broad feature set and extensive third-party integrations, innRoad’s larger reviews and active development give it a clear advantage. But if ease of use and support are your top priorities, OpenHotel’s higher recent ratings and customer praise make it the safer choice.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported property management system with proven customer satisfaction, innRoad’s higher review volume and more recent feedback make it the recommended pick.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
OpenHotel
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问