The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 335 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and Redforts by Redforts hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they approach this goal differently. InnRoad offers a more established presence with a broader feature set and a larger user base, while Redforts emphasizes affordability and ease of use. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, complexity, and support requirements.
InnRoad boasts a higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and a broader integration network. Does your hotel prioritize proven reliability and extensive connectivity? Or does your team prefer a cost-effective, straightforward solution? Let’s compare these options head-to-head.
InnRoad and Redforts both serve the core purpose of managing reservations, guest data, and operations, but their strengths diverge when examining features, support, and market presence. InnRoad’s comprehensive suite includes revenue management, a booking engine, and channel management, making it suitable for hotels seeking a full-service platform. Conversely, Redforts focuses on automation and simplifying daily tasks, often appealing to smaller properties or those with limited staff.
While innRoad has a strong North American and European presence, Redforts offers broader global coverage, including Africa and South America. Do you need a system with a proven track record and deep integrations, or a flexible, budget-conscious platform? The choice depends on how much complexity your property requires.
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich PMS with high customization, extensive integrations, and a solid reputation, innRoad is the better fit. It’s ideal for properties looking to increase direct bookings—many users report up to a 35-50% rise—and improve operational oversight through detailed reporting and automation.
If your hotel is smaller, budget-sensitive, or prioritizes ease of use with minimal setup fuss, Redforts is the preferable choice. It provides essential management functions with a simple interface, supports automation, and offers competitive pricing, especially for properties that do not require the advanced features innRoad offers.
In summary, choose innRoad if you want a comprehensive enterprise-level system with an extensive partner network. Opt for Redforts if you prefer a straightforward, affordable solution that emphasizes automating routine tasks.
innRoad’s user interface scores around 4.49/5, with reviews praising its intuitive Tape Chart and reservation management tools. However, some users report glitches, slow performance, and a learning curve when managing groups or mobile access, which can hinder staff adoption.
Redforts edges out slightly with a 4.68/5 rating for ease of use, and users repeatedly highlight its straightforward, clean interface, making onboarding quick. Its design simplifies daily tasks for small teams, reducing errors and training time.
Edge: Redforts.
innRoad offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a channel manager, revenue management, gift vouchers, and an integrated housekeeper module. Its total of 37 features demonstrates its depth, catering to larger or more complex properties.
Redforts provides 9 unique features, such as guest app, automated reminders, and ID scanning, alongside its core PMS and booking engine. While fewer features, these are optimized for automation and operational efficiency for smaller setups.
The deciding factor hinges on your property’s complexity: innRoad’s extensive feature set favors larger, multi-property hotels. Redforts’ streamlined tools suit properties seeking simplicity with automation.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s support scores slightly higher at 4.54/5, with many reviewers praising their 24/7 live support and dedicated onboarding teams. Users share that innRoad’s support is prompt and professional, though some mention occasional delays in troubleshooting complex issues.
Redforts is close behind, with a 4.53/5 rating, and customers appreciate their friendly, responsive service. While reviews are fewer, the recent positive feedback indicates strong ongoing support.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad connects with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs, accounting, and property services like QuickBooks and Revinate. Its extensive network supports large, multi-channel operations with ease.
Redforts, with only 2 verified integrations (including WuBook and Mr Winston), offers limited connectivity, making it better suited for properties with simple tech stacks or those that prioritize native features over third-party integrations.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews are abundant—238 in the last 6 months—and it maintains an overall rating of 4.7/5, with an NPS of 8.82/10. Hoteliers across segments, especially boutique and limited-service hotels, praise its usability and impact on revenue.
Redforts, with only 40 reviews and a recent review count of just 1, has a perfect 5-star rating but limited data. Its user base primarily consists of small hotels and hostels, which highlight ease of use and automation.
Given the volume and recency of innRoad’s reviews, it is clearly the more trusted platform among hoteliers.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a $300 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation, setup, or hidden charges. There’s no freemium model or per-room fee, making its pricing straightforward.
Redforts costs $500 per month, also with no setup or hidden fees. Its higher base price reflects its broader feature set and smaller user base, but it offers similar value for smaller properties.
Pricing alone shouldn’t be the sole factor, but innRoad’s lower cost with a richer feature set offers better value overall.
Not ideal if your property is very small, has minimal staff, or operates primarily on manual processes.
Not ideal if you need extensive customization, advanced revenue tools, or integrations with many third-party platforms.
innRoad stands out as the more comprehensive property management solution, with a higher number of reviews, recent user feedback, and a broader feature set. Its ability to support complex operations, multi-property management, and extensive integrations makes it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels looking to grow.
Redforts offers a cost-effective, easy-to-use platform that automates core tasks and appeals to small hotels or hostels. Its simplicity and affordability make it ideal for properties prioritizing operational efficiency over advanced features.
Choose innRoad if you need a full-featured, scalable PMS with proven reliability and extensive connectivity. Opt for Redforts if your focus is on ease, automation, and budget-conscious management.
In conclusion, innRoad’s larger user base, recent reviews, and feature depth make it the recommended choice for most hotels seeking a reliable, scalable PMS. Redforts is better suited for smaller properties or those just starting out with automation.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问