The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a platform that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and provides reliable support. innRoad by innRoad offers a feature-rich, user-friendly experience backed by recent, extensive reviews, while TimeShareWare by SS&C, primarily tailored for timeshare and resort management, lacks recent user feedback and broader hotel industry adoption. Your decision hinges on which system aligns best with your property’s size, complexity, and growth goals.
Both products aim to solve core hospitality challenges: reservation management, OTA integration, and financial oversight. innRoad emphasizes operational ease and revenue increase, while TimeShareWare focuses on complex asset management for shared ownership. Do you prioritize a proven, hotel-specific PMS, or a broader, multi-use platform?
innRoad is a cloud-based, hotel-centric PMS with a solid 4.7/5 overall rating from 238 recent reviews, emphasizing ease of use, customer support, and a broad feature set. TimeShareWare, by contrast, has no recent reviews or ratings available, and its primary audience is timeshare and multi-use resort operators, not standard hotels.
innRoad’s recent review activity and high satisfaction ratings make it the more trustworthy choice for hotels seeking a proven solution. TimeShareWare’s lack of recent feedback and limited hotel-specific features suggest it’s less suited for typical hotel operations. Are you comfortable relying on a platform with no recent reviews for your hotel’s critical systems?
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use PMS with strong OTA integration, revenue management, and customer support, go with innRoad. Its extensive feature set—including channel management, booking engine, guest communication, and revenue tools—caters directly to hotel operations and has proven success in increasing bookings and revenue.
If your property is a timeshare resort, vacation club, or multi-site shared ownership operation with complex management needs, then TimeShareWare may seem tailored. However, given the absence of recent reviews and limited hotel-focused features, innRoad remains the more reliable choice for typical hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
innRoad scores 4.49/5 for ease of use, based on recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple navigation, and helpful onboarding. Customers highlight its drag-and-drop tape chart, straightforward reservation management, and accessible support as key advantages. Some users mention occasional glitches but generally find the platform reliable and staff-friendly.
TimeShareWare’s usability is unverified due to the lack of recent reviews. Its focus on complex resort management suggests a steeper learning curve for non-specialists, and no user feedback currently confirms its ease of use for hotel staff.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 56 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, group booking, revenue management, gift vouchers, guest messaging, automated night audit, and integrations with 34 partners like Quickbooks and Revinate. Its comprehensive suite covers most hotel operational needs.
TimeShareWare’s feature set is not detailed or recent, focusing more on lease management, owner services, and resort-specific functions. Its limited hotel-specific features and no recent updates make innRoad’s feature depth and versatility the clear winner.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s customer support scores 4.54/5, with recent reviews highlighting 24/7 live support, dedicated onboarding, and prompt issue resolution. Users consistently praise the support team’s professionalism and reliability, even during glitches or system upgrades.
TimeShareWare has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making it impossible to assess. Given innRoad’s proven support reputation, it is the safer choice for hotels prioritizing responsive assistance.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partners, including major OTA connections, accounting software, and payment processors, facilitating seamless operational workflows. It also offers integrations with tools like Quickbooks, Revinate, and RateGain, providing flexibility and scalability.
TimeShareWare currently has only a single verified partner, limiting integration options. For hotels needing a connected, adaptable system, innRoad’s extensive partner network is a decisive advantage.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews are recent, with a 4.7/5 rating from 238 reviews, most praising its ease of use, support, and feature set. Hotel segments such as independent properties and boutique hotels rate it especially highly, often citing revenue boosts and operational improvements.
TimeShareWare lacks recent feedback or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Its limited hotel focus and no recent reviews suggest innRoad is the preferred choice for user-rated reliability and satisfaction.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s pricing starts at $300/month with no hidden fees or implementation costs. There’s no free trial, but the transparent flat fee covers most core features.
Pricing details for TimeShareWare are not publicly available, and it’s primarily marketed for larger resort operations. Given the lack of transparent hotel-specific pricing, innRoad’s straightforward model provides clearer value for hotel budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
innRoad provides a proven, hotel-specific PMS with a broad feature set, extensive recent reviews, and high user satisfaction. Its focus on operational ease, revenue growth, and support makes it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially independent and boutique properties seeking growth.
TimeShareWare is tailored for timeshare and resort management, but the lack of recent reviews and hotel-specific features limit its appeal for standard hotels. Its strengths lie in managing shared ownership assets, not general hotel operations.
Choose innRoad if your hotel values reliability, ease of use, and proven results. Opt for TimeShareWare only if you operate a timeshare or complex resort and are comfortable with limited recent feedback.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 TimeShareWare 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TimeShareWare 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。TimeShareWare:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,SS&C 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问