The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Isidoro 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Isidoro |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Isidoro by Isidoro and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both claim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, user base, and support vary significantly. Isidoro’s platform is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, while Mews boasts a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews and a high user rating. Which system will truly serve your hotel today and scale with you tomorrow?
If your priority is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types, Mews stands out. Conversely, Isidoro's minimal review data and absence of a recent user base make it difficult to assess its true performance or suitability.
Both Isidoro and Mews aim to simplify hotel operations, but their approaches diverge sharply. Isidoro offers no public feature list, no verified integrations, and no recent reviews, raising questions about its capabilities and support. Mews, on the other hand, provides over 59 unique features, more than 336 verified integrations, and hundreds of recent reviews that consistently praise its ease of use, support, and flexibility.
Mews’s recent reviews from nearly 100 hotels in the last six months, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its relevance and reliability. Isidoro's lack of recent data and zero reviews make it impossible to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Are you willing to take a chance on an unproven system, or do you prefer a solution with validated performance?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear choice. It caters well to boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties, offering modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel operates a single property with minimal complexity, and you're comfortable with an untested platform, Isidoro might seem appealing, but there's no recent data to confirm this. For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term scalability, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment.
Mews is praised by users for its intuitive, modern interface, with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 758 reviews, and a straightforward onboarding process scored similarly. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff adopt Mews, citing its clean design and helpful training resources.
In contrast, Isidoro’s ease of use is not documented publicly, with no reviews or ratings available. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to compare usability directly, but given Mews’s extensive positive reviews, it’s clear that Mews is the more user-friendly option. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, advanced booking engines, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and extensive integrations. These features enable a hotel to personalize the guest journey, automate operations, and connect to a broad tech ecosystem.
Isidoro’s feature set is not publicly available or verified, with no specific modules or functionalities listed. Without concrete information, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers comparable capabilities. Based on available data, Mews’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support has been rated 4.27/5 by users, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users often mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, with some noting their proactive communication during onboarding.
Isidoro’s customer support is unreviewed and unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s high support ratings and consistent recent praise, it’s clear that Mews provides more reliable, accessible support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, offering a comprehensive ecosystem. This enables hotels to tailor their tech stack for operations, revenue, and guest experience enhancements.
Isidoro reports no verified partners, raising concerns about its capability to connect with other hotel systems. Without proven integrations, Isidoro’s flexibility is questionable. Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant practical advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 758 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% recommendation rate from diverse properties including boutique hotels, hostels, resorts, and chains. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and extensive features, particularly for mid-sized and larger operations.
Isidoro’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The recent and plentiful positive feedback for Mews decisively favors it as the trusted, high-rated choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900/month with no free tier or trial, which might be a barrier for some small properties. Isidoro’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no recent reviews or user data, it’s unclear whether it offers a competitive or scalable pricing model.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clear financial benchmark. Without data supporting Isidoro’s cost-effectiveness, Mews’s price point, supported by extensive positive reviews, remains a more concrete indicator of value.
Not ideal if:
Edge: None (uncertain due to lack of data).
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-packed PMS supported by a large user community and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem, high support ratings, and documented success stories make it a reliable partner for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
Isidoro’s platform remains unreviewed and unverified, with no recent data to confirm its capabilities or support quality. For hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, Mews’s established track record makes it the clear choice.
If you want a system with proven functionality, seamless integrations, and happy users, go with Mews.
If your hotel has minimal needs and is willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Isidoro might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features position it as the smarter, safer investment for your hotel’s management system today.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Isidoro 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Isidoro 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Isidoro:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Isidoro 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问