项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 267 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Joinways 表现出色 .
Tripleseat 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 PCI Compliant Payments.
基于 HTR 上 267 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 267 |
在分析了 267 条经验证的评价后,Joinways 用户最看重其 ,而 Tripleseat 用户则强调 培训、入职和支持质量, 用户友好的工作流程和易用性, 集中式事件和预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
培训、入职和支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的工作流程和易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式事件和预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
文档和提案定制
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支付、开票和合同
▾
|
|
|
−
与PMS、计费及其他系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
−
报告与预测
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 活动管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 52 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 152 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 155 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 93 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 55 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 224 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #4 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right event management software for your hotel involves balancing features, ease of use, support, and overall value. Joinways by Joinways and Tripleseat by Tripleseat both aim to streamline event planning, but they serve different hotel segments and vary greatly in maturity and review confidence. Your team needs a solution that fits your specific operational complexity and growth plans. Are you ready to make an informed choice?
Joinways and Tripleseat both aim to centralize event workflows, but they differ significantly in maturity and user confidence. Joinways, founded in 2026, is a new entrant with no reviews or ratings, suggesting it might lack the depth of real-world feedback. Tripleseat, established in 2008, boasts over 229 reviews with a 4.78/5 overall rating and recent reviews in the last six months, making it the more proven option.
Tripleseat’s extensive feature set, including contact management, CRM, and eSignature capabilities, is far more developed than Joinways’ minimal offerings. Joinways focuses mainly on inquiry management and BEOs, while Tripleseat covers the entire event lifecycle from lead capture to post-event reporting. Do you want a platform with a proven track record or a new player that might still evolve?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive event platform with proven reliability, go with Tripleseat. It’s ideal for boutique, city center, or resort hotels that require robust features like client portals, task management, and extensive integrations. For teams that value mature support, extensive integrations, and a rich feature set, Tripleseat is the clear choice.
Joinways could appeal if your hotel operates mainly in North America or other regions where budget or simple workflows are prioritized, and you’re comfortable with a less tested product. However, its lack of reviews and features makes it less suitable for complex or high-volume event operations. For now, Tripleseat offers a more secure, feature-rich choice for most hotel segments.
Tripleseat rates 4.54/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users describe it as "simple to navigate" and praise its friendly layout, which helps staff adopt the system quickly.
Joinways, with a 0/5 ease-of-use rating, provides no review data to gauge user experience. Its lack of established user feedback suggests it may not be as polished or user-friendly as Tripleseat.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat offers 11 unique features, including contact management, client portals, task management, eSignatures, diagramming, and seating management—features absent in Joinways. Joinways, by comparison, has no unique features and appears to focus on inquiry management, proposals, and BEOs alone.
The breadth of Tripleseat’s features allows hotels to manage the entire event process within one platform, reducing manual work and disjointed systems. Joinways’s limited features may restrict your team’s ability to handle complex event workflows efficiently.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat boasts a 4.57/5 support rating, with many users praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Review quotes mention quick help responses, ongoing support, and a willingness to educate users, which fosters confidence during onboarding and daily use.
Joinways, with no reviews or ratings, provides no clear indication of support quality. Its new market presence suggests it might lack the dedicated support infrastructure that Tripleseat has built over years.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat offers 15 verified integrations, including major systems like WebRezPro, Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and Stripe. These integrations facilitate smooth data flow across sales, operations, and payment systems, reducing manual entry.
Joinways currently has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For hotels relying on multiple software tools, Tripleseat’s ecosystem provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat’s 229 reviews contribute to an overall rating of 4.78/5, with many hotel segments, especially boutique and brand hotels, expressing high satisfaction. Recent reviews emphasize its efficiency, ease of use, and support, with a 9.04/10 NPS score indicating strong recommendation levels.
Joinways has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without feedback, its perceived value remains uncertain for hotel teams.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Joinways does not publicly list pricing or offer a free trial, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. Tripleseat charges a starting monthly fee of $400, with no trial or implementation fees listed.
Given Tripleseat’s transparent pricing model, hotels can better budget and plan for the platform. Joinways’s undefined pricing diminishes its attractiveness for budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Tripleseat and Joinways aim to simplify event management but cater to different hotel needs. Joinways, still emerging, lacks reviews and features, making it a risky choice for complex operations. Tripleseat, with over 229 reviews and a 4.78/5 score, has proven its value across hotel segments and regions.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform with strong support, go with Tripleseat. Its extensive integrations and proven user satisfaction make it a safer bet for high-volume, multi-property, or sophisticated event teams.
Choose Joinways only if you prioritize a budget-friendly, simple inquiry management tool for low-volume operations and are comfortable with less support and fewer features. For most hotels, Tripleseat’s reliability and broad capabilities outweigh the benefits of a newer, less tested solution.
活动管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
勘探和潜在客户
|
|
|
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
|
▾
查询管理
|
|
|
| 潜在客户表格 | ||
|
▾
提案管理
|
|
|
| 可定制的 BEO、提案和合同文件 | ||
| 电子签名 | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 绘图和平面图 | ||
|
▾
工作流程自动化
|
|
|
| 任务管理(任务和提醒) | ||
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
|
▾
合同与批准
|
|
|
| 电子签名 | ||
| 可定制的 BEO、提案和合同文件 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
| 绘图和平面图 | ||
|
▾
沟通与协作
|
|
|
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 行程打印输出 | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 与会者消息 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
|
▾
支付与合规
|
|
|
| PCI 合规付款 | ||
|
▾
与会者管理
|
|
|
| 活动签到管理 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 座位管理 | ||
|
▾
活动策划
|
|
|
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 座位管理 | ||
| 绘图和平面图 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
入职和支持的体验参差不齐,但都很重要。一些评论者称赞响应迅速的团队、帮助性的培训和Tripleseat大学,而另一些则表示设置不充分,或者他们不得不在没有足够指... 入职和支持的体验参差不齐,但都很重要。一些评论者称赞响应迅速的团队、帮助性的培训和Tripleseat大学,而另一些则表示设置不充分,或者他们不得不在没有足够指导的情况下弄清复杂的工作流程。
许多评论者将Tripleseat描述为直观、易于学习且适合日常活动工作的工具。他们表示它在更新细节、管理日历和查找信息时帮助团队提高了效率,尽管一些大型活动的工... 许多评论者将Tripleseat描述为直观、易于学习且适合日常活动工作的工具。他们表示它在更新细节、管理日历和查找信息时帮助团队提高了效率,尽管一些大型活动的工作流程仍可能变得繁琐。
用户反复表示Tripleseat将潜在客户、预订、合同、BEOs、任务和沟通集中在一个平台上,使事件运营更易协调。这种集中化减少了遗漏细节,帮助酒店团队在销售、运营... 用户反复表示Tripleseat将潜在客户、预订、合同、BEOs、任务和沟通集中在一个平台上,使事件运营更易协调。这种集中化减少了遗漏细节,帮助酒店团队在销售、运营和服务方面保持一致。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
评论者提到Tripleseat支持支付、签署合同和发票工作流程,从而加快业务的完成。然而,也有人指出在ACH设置、发票编号、免税处理、信用卡授权表格以及其他手动财... 评论者提到Tripleseat支持支付、签署合同和发票工作流程,从而加快业务的完成。然而,也有人指出在ACH设置、发票编号、免税处理、信用卡授权表格以及其他手动财务步骤方面存在一些摩擦。
集成是一个反复关注的问题,尤其是与酒店PMS、房态系统、计费工具和收益管理平台的集成。评审者喜欢系统连接良好的价值,但也有一些描述单向同步、故障或缺失连... 集成是一个反复关注的问题,尤其是与酒店PMS、房态系统、计费工具和收益管理平台的集成。评审者喜欢系统连接良好的价值,但也有一些描述单向同步、故障或缺失连接,导致重复录入和延迟工作流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Joinways 和 Tripleseat 共享许多核心 Event Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Joinways 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tripleseat 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Tripleseat 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Joinways:否。Tripleseat:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Event Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Joinways 的 HT Score 为 0,Tripleseat 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐