The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 125 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Jonas Hospitality 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Housekeeping Mobile App.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 125 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,100/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 25 | 100 |
在分析了 125 条经验证的评价后,Jonas Hospitality 用户最看重其 客户服务, 易于使用, 持续改进,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面和可访问性
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
支付处理器集成
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
可靠性
▾
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #70 1 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #28 21 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #37 2 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #49 6 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 18 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 9 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #20 24 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Jonas Chorum by Jonas Hospitality and roommaster PMS are two leading options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. While Jonas boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, roommaster offers a broader integration ecosystem and a longer market presence. How do you decide which platform aligns best with your hotel's needs and future growth?
Both Jonas Chorum and roommaster PMS aim to streamline hotel operations through centralized platforms, but they cater to different hotel profiles and operational preferences. Jonas focuses heavily on North American markets with a user-friendly, mobile-optimized interface, and robust reporting features. Conversely, roommaster has a significantly larger global footprint, with more integrations, over 270 reports, and a longer history in the hotel industry.
Jonas Chorum's strengths lie in its modern UI, ease of use, and excellent customer support, making it attractive for properties prioritizing intuitive workflows. Roommaster, however, excels in its extensive integration capabilities, customizable dashboards, and its capacity to serve larger or multi-property hotels with complex operational needs.
The critical question becomes: do you prioritize ease of adoption and modern mobile features, or do you need a system with vast integrations and advanced reporting for complex operations? The answer hinges on your hotel size, tech maturity, and growth plans.
If your hotel is a mid-sized property or boutique focusing on North American markets, Jonas Chorum is likely the better fit. It’s praised for its simple onboarding, high user ratings (4.59/5), and recent positive reviews from users emphasizing its intuitive design and reliable performance.
If your hotel is a larger, multi-property operation or requires comprehensive integrations—especially if you operate in regions beyond North America—roommaster's extensive partner network (56 verified integrations) and over 270 reports make it more suitable. Its long-standing market presence (founded in 1994) and specialized features cater well to hotels seeking deep customization and detailed business intelligence.
For properties prioritizing user experience, Jonas stands out. For those needing complex operational control and extensive integrations, roommaster is the more comprehensive choice.
Jonas Chorum scores 4.35/5 on ease of use, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface, straightforward navigation, and mobile access. Users say it is "easy to learn" and appreciate its "intuitive" design, which minimizes training time and supports quick adoption—especially valuable for smaller teams or properties with high staff turnover.
Roommaster's ease of use receives a slightly lower rating of 4.22/5, with some users describing the system as "clunky" and "slow," especially when navigating complex reports or workflows. Reviewers note that customer support can be inconsistent, and some find the interface less modern, which can impact staff productivity.
Edge: Jonas Chorum.
Jonas offers 6 features exclusive to its platform, including ancillary revenue tracking, a housekeeping mobile app, spa & wellness modules, lobby kiosks, drag-and-drop tape charts, and tablet/kiosk check-in. These features support guest-facing services and operational flexibility.
roommaster provides 17 unique features, such as integrated payment terminals, native email marketing, multi-currency support, channel management, revenue management, guest CRM, gift vouchers, group booking engines, and centralized messaging. These tools cater to larger or more complex properties needing extensive operational and marketing capabilities.
While Jonas offers specific guest engagement tools, roommaster's broader feature set makes it the more versatile choice for hotels with complex needs or multiple revenue streams.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Jonas Hospitality's support ratings are 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and proactive problem-solving. Many users mention that Jonas actively seeks feedback and implements improvements, fostering a collaborative relationship.
roommaster support scores 4.25/5, with some users praising quick responses and ease of troubleshooting. However, others note that customer support can be inconsistent, with some reviews citing delays and limited help over the phone.
Given the stronger overall support rating and recent positive reviews, Jonas Chorum holds the edge here.
Edge: Jonas Chorum.
roommaster boasts 56 verified partners, significantly more than Jonas' 28. Shared integrations include major providers like SiteMinder, Revinate, Oracle Hospitality, and Shift4 Payments, ensuring broad connectivity with booking engines, PMS, and POS systems.
Jonas has fewer integrations but covers core partnerships essential for North American hotels, including Hotek, IVvy, and Sojern, emphasizing quality over quantity. Its partner ecosystem is more curated, which can simplify support and reliability.
For extensive, global integration needs, roommaster is superior. For more targeted, North American-focused integrations, Jonas is sufficient.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Jonas Chorum has a higher overall rating of 4.59/5 from 24 recent reviews, with a strong 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, reliability, and robust reporting, especially in boutique or limited-service segments.
roommaster's rating is 4.33/5 from 83 reviews, with a slightly lower recommendation rate of 91%. Reviewers appreciate its extensive reporting and operational control but note issues with interface simplicity and support consistency.
In recent feedback, Jonas’s superior rating and recommendation rate make it the clearer winner.
Edge: Jonas Chorum.
Jonas Hospitality does not list specific pricing, indicating it may require direct contact for quotes or custom packages. It likely operates on a subscription model, common among modern SaaS PMS providers.
roommaster costs $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial available. The pricing reflects its longer market presence and broader feature set, typically appealing to larger hotels or chains with complex needs.
Pricing transparency favors roommaster’s fixed fee, but the value depends on your hotel’s operational scope and feature requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations or operates in regions outside North America. Larger, multi-property chains with complex operational workflows may find Jonas’s offerings limiting.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique or primarily North American market, where simpler solutions or newer interfaces might be preferred.
Jonas Chorum stands out as a modern, easy-to-use PMS with high recent reviews and a strong focus on North American hotels. It offers essential operational features, excellent support, and a quick onboarding process. Its higher overall ratings and recent positive feedback make it an appealing choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and mobile access.
roommaster, however, remains a highly capable option with a larger integration network, more advanced features, and a longer industry history. It caters well to larger, multi-property hotels or those needing comprehensive control and extensive reporting.
If your hotel values modern design, ease of use, and rapid deployment, Jonas Chorum is the better pick. If your operation demands complex integrations, global reach, and detailed data management, roommaster is the more suitable option.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a reliable, user-friendly PMS with recent positive reviews, Jonas Chorum leads. For larger or multi-property hotels with complex needs, roommaster provides a more adaptable and feature-rich experience.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Jonas Chorum 和 roommaster PMS 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Jonas Chorum 的客户服务因其响应迅速、知识渊博和解决问题的热情而受到高度赞誉。特别提到了模范员工,强调了许多用户所体验到的个性化支持。
PMS 的设计简单直观,员工(包括新员工)均可轻松使用,从而减少培训时间并提高运营效率。用户对该系统处理团体预订和费率的能力表示赞赏。
酒店经营者注意到 Jonas Chorum 积极寻求用户反馈,并经常实施改进建议。这种响应能力促进了公司与客户之间的合作关系,支持了服务的发展。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用... 许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用。
Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增... Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增加财务和运营压力。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Jonas Chorum 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Jonas Chorum 提供 28 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Jonas Chorum 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Jonas Chorum:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Jonas Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 18,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问