The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 59 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Jonas Hospitality 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Mobile App.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 59 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 25 | 34 |
在分析了 59 条经验证的评价后,Jonas Hospitality 用户最看重其 客户服务, 持续改进, 高级报告,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 支持团队, 执行, 培训材料。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
+
移动功能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面和可访问性
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
支付处理器集成
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
可靠性
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #70 1 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #28 21 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #37 2 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #49 6 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 18 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 9 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #20 24 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between Jonas Chorum by Jonas Hospitality and Shiji Daylight PMS requires understanding how each product addresses your hotel’s core operational challenges. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific needs for integration and customization.
Jonas Chorum offers a user-friendly interface rooted in a long hotel industry history, emphasizing operational reliability and ease of use. Shiji Daylight PMS, meanwhile, leans into modern cloud architecture and global scalability, with a broad feature set suited for larger or multi-property groups. Which approach aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Jonas Chorum provides a full-featured PMS delivered via a web browser, focusing on simplicity, reliability, and strong reporting. Its interface is praised by users for being concise and intuitive, especially benefiting staff who need quick access to operational data.
Shiji Daylight PMS emphasizes scalability and customization, with a cloud-native platform designed for hotels of all sizes, from boutique properties to worldwide chains. It centralizes guest data with a Single Guest Profile, enabling tailored service across multiple locations.
While Jonas scores high in overall user satisfaction with a 4.59/5 rating from 24 reviews, Shiji’s broad feature set and global presence mean it appeals more to larger, multi-property hotels. The choice depends on whether your hotel prioritizes ease of use and stability or comprehensive, scalable features.
Ultimately, if your hotel needs a straightforward, reliable PMS with high user satisfaction, Jonas Chorum is the stronger choice. If your operation involves multiple properties or demands extensive integrations and customization, Shiji Daylight is worth considering. Are you ready to weigh simplicity against scalability?
If your hotel is a mid-sized property or a group with a preference for a straightforward, easy-to-learn system, go with Jonas Chorum. It’s favored by hoteliers for its user-friendly interface, excellent reporting, and reliable performance, making onboarding and staff adaptation seamless.
If your hotel is part of a larger chain or requires advanced features like integrated CRS, guest profiles, digital registration, and extensive automation, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better fit. Its cloud architecture and broad feature set are designed to scale and adapt to complex operational needs.
For boutique or independent hotels prioritizing ease of training and quick deployment, Jonas Chorum’s high ratings in onboarding (4.13/5) and customer support (4.6/5) make it an ideal choice. Conversely, for hotels seeking a flexible, multi-system integrated platform with a global reach, Shiji’s extensive integration network and multi-lingual support are key advantages.
In summary, choose Jonas if you value simplicity, stability, and proven user satisfaction. Opt for Shiji if your hotel demands advanced automation, multi-property management, and broad customization. Which product aligns more closely with your operational priorities?
Jonas Chorum’s UI earns a 4.35/5 ease-of-use rating, praised for its clear layout and quick access to key functions like rate changes and group blocking. Users report that staff can learn the system rapidly, reducing training time and improving daily workflow.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores slightly higher at 4.63/5, with many users citing its intuitive, modern interface and well-structured training materials. Its cloud-based design simplifies onboarding, especially for multi-property groups, with a straightforward task flow that reduces user errors.
Edge: Shiji Group.
While Jonas is praised for its simplicity, Shiji’s interface is slightly more modern and adaptable, especially for larger teams needing quick, multi-tasking capabilities. If ease of use is your top priority, Shiji’s interface and training resources give it an edge.
Jonas Chorum offers five unique features: Channel Manager, Revenue Management module, Booking Engine, Mobile App, and Spa & Wellness Module. These cater to operational and revenue-enhancing activities, making it a comprehensive system for hotels seeking built-in tools without complex customization.
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts 54 features, including Guest Profiles, Multi-lingual support, Digital Registration, Automated Reminders, Housekeeping Mobile App, and integrated Payment Terminals. Its extensive feature set supports automation, guest personalization, and multi-property management at a larger scale.
Edge: Shiji Group.
If your hotel needs a wide array of functionalities—especially automation, digital services, and multi-property tools—Shiji’s larger feature library is advantageous. For hotels prioritizing core PMS functions with some integrations, Jonas’s targeted features may suffice.
Jonas Hospitality’s customer support shines with a 4.6/5 rating, with reviewers describing their support as responsive, knowledgeable, and dedicated. Hoteliers appreciate quick resolution times and personalized assistance, emphasizing a collaborative support experience.
Shiji Group’s support scores slightly lower at 4.53/5. but is consistently praised for its professionalism and helpfulness. Users highlight the support team’s availability and effective training materials, especially during implementation.
Edge: Jonas Hospitality.
Given the recent reviews and higher support rating, Jonas Chorum demonstrates a slightly better support experience. If reliable, quick support influences your decision, Jonas has the edge.
Jonas Hospitality integrates with 28 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Oracle Hospitality. Its integrations focus on channel management, revenue, and POS systems, facilitating a smoother operational workflow.
Shiji Group supports 64 verified partners, including SiteMinder, Adyen, Oaky, and TigerTMS. Its broader partner network covers payment, marketing, automation, and channel management, supporting larger and more complex operations.
Edge: Shiji Group.
If extensive integrations are vital to your tech stack, Shiji’s broader network offers more flexibility and coverage. However, for straightforward connectivity, Jonas’s select partnerships may be sufficient.
Jonas Chorum's recent reviews reflect an overall 4.59/5 rating from 24 reviews, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, reliability, and reporting. It is especially favored by independent and limited-service hotels for its straightforward operation.
Shiji’s reviews, though slightly fewer in recent data, tend to emphasize its extensive features and scalability. However, the overall user ratings are lower, partly due to performance issues and customization concerns.
Edge: Jonas Hospitality.
Considering the more recent and higher-rated reviews, Jonas Chorum is rated higher by hoteliers, particularly for small to mid-sized properties. If user satisfaction is your priority, Jonas wins this comparison.
Jonas Hospitality does not publicly disclose pricing; it offers a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. There is no free trial or transparent pricing model listed.
Shiji Group charges a base price of $1,200 per month, with no free trial or tiered pricing disclosed. Its pricing is straightforward but potentially expensive for smaller hotels.
Overall, Jonas's pricing remains opaque, requiring direct inquiry, while Shiji’s transparent base fee provides clarity, though it may be a significant investment for smaller properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex multi-property management or extensive custom integrations, as Jonas may lack some advanced automation features.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers a simple, cost-effective system, as Shiji’s broad feature set might be overwhelming or unnecessary.
Jonas Chorum excels in providing a reliable, user-friendly PMS built on a foundation of solid hotel industry experience. Its strengths lie in operational stability, ease of onboarding, and high user satisfaction, especially for mid-sized or independent hotels.
Shiji Daylight PMS is tailored for scalability and automation, with a broad feature set suitable for large, multi-property operations or brands that need extensive integrations and customization. Its cloud architecture and global support make it ideal for complex hotel groups.
Choose Jonas if your hotel values simplicity, proven support, and a high satisfaction rating. Go with Shiji if you need a flexible, scalable platform with comprehensive features and broad integrations. Your decision should align with your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Jonas Chorum 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 44 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Jonas Chorum 的客户服务因其响应迅速、知识渊博和解决问题的热情而受到高度赞誉。特别提到了模范员工,强调了许多用户所体验到的个性化支持。
PMS 的设计简单直观,员工(包括新员工)均可轻松使用,从而减少培训时间并提高运营效率。用户对该系统处理团体预订和费率的能力表示赞赏。
酒店经营者注意到 Jonas Chorum 积极寻求用户反馈,并经常实施改进建议。这种响应能力促进了公司与客户之间的合作关系,支持了服务的发展。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用... 许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用。
Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增... Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增加财务和运营压力。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Jonas Chorum 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Jonas Chorum 提供 28 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Jonas Chorum:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Jonas Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 18,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问