LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) vs. Quore: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 133 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 133 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Work Prioritization and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).

Quore 表现出色 在 沟通效率 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.4/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 与 Quore 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 133 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
25
推荐可能性
99%
91%
易用性
5.0/5
4.4/5
客户支持
4.9/5
4.4/5
性价比
4.9/5
4.4/5
起始价格 From $1,100/mo From $200/mo
经验证的评价 16 117

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 与 Quore 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 133 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 ,而 Quore 用户则强调 沟通效率, 追踪和报告, 宾客信息和互动。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
优点
+ 沟通效率
+ 追踪和报告
+ 宾客信息和互动
缺点
定制
培训和入职
移动应用程序限制

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Quore:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 员工协作工具 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
小型(10-24 间客房) #7 7 条评价 #9 3 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #16 5 条评价 #6 53 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #19 2 条评价 #5 36 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #3 15 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
精品酒店 #17 5 条评价 #5 46 条评价
豪华酒店 #24 2 条评价 #4 40 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #25 1 条评价 #3 96 条评价
长住酒店 #8 8 条评价 #5 15 条评价

按区域

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
北美 #33 0 条评价 #4 100 条评价
欧洲 #6 15 条评价 #15 2 条评价
亚太 #11 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between LIKE MAGIC’s Staff App and Quore hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to improve staff collaboration, streamline operations, and enhance guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. LIKE MAGIC is a newer, Swiss-made platform that automates the entire guest journey, while Quore offers over 30 specialized tools for detailed operational management. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?

LIKE MAGIC’s recent surge in reviews and high ratings give it a clear edge. Quore, with its longer market presence, has a broader feature set but fewer recent reviews. This makes LIKE MAGIC the more reliable choice for up-to-date insights. Are you ready to dive into the details?

Is LIKE MAGIC or Quore Better for Hotels?

LIKE MAGIC and Quore address staff collaboration and operational efficiency, but they do so through different lenses. LIKE MAGIC automates guest interactions and operational workflows via a unified platform, reducing manual tasks and staff workload. Quore, by contrast, emphasizes detailed task tracking, maintenance, and department management through numerous specialized tools.

LIKE MAGIC’s core strength lies in automating the guest journey and integrating systems like PMS, access control, and messaging, making it ideal for properties prioritizing guest experience automation. Quore’s extensive toolset suits hotels needing in-depth operational oversight, especially those with complex maintenance and housekeeping workflows.

In terms of reviews, LIKE MAGIC has only 16 reviews, with 2 recent ones, compared to Quore’s 115 reviews and no recent feedback. LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews highlight high satisfaction and ease of use, suggesting more current reliability. So, which platform better matches your hotel’s operational style?

Quore vs LIKE MAGIC: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-tool management system with extensive housekeeping, maintenance, and guest service features, Quore is the logical choice. It offers 18 unique tools, including work orders, asset maintenance logs, and preventative maintenance plans, making it suitable for large or complex properties.

However, if your goal is to automate the entire guest journey and simplify staff workflows with a focus on digital guest services, LIKE MAGIC is preferable. It excels in reducing staffing needs—like Zipper Hotel’s 80% staff reduction—and improving guest experience through features like digital check-in, messaging, and self-service options.

For properties seeking automation and seamless integrations, LIKE MAGIC’s rapidly evolving platform and higher review scores make it the stronger option. Think about your operational focus—are you aiming for detailed task management or guest-centric automation?

Is LIKE MAGIC or Quore Easier to Use?

LIKE MAGIC boasts a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, supported by onboarding ratings of 4.93/5. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick setup, and how staff quickly adapt, with comments like “the platform is very user-friendly and streamlined.” Its mobile-first design and automation reduce staff training times, leading to high staff buy-in.

Quore, with a 4.43/5 ease of use rating, is also well-regarded but slightly less intuitive for some users, especially during onboarding, rated 4.18/5. Users mention a steep learning curve and issues with load times, which can hinder quick adoption.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Has Better Features: LIKE MAGIC or Quore?

Quore significantly outpaces LIKE MAGIC with 18 unique features compared to 6. LIKE MAGIC’s exclusive features include work prioritization, file library support, late checkouts, automated replies, message templates, and open API. These focus on automating guest interactions, messaging, and basic task management.

Quore offers a broader suite, including work orders, recurring tasks, asset maintenance logs, inventory analysis, preventative maintenance, inspection tools, and in-app translation. Its feature set supports detailed operational control, ideal for large or multi-department hotels.

While Quore provides more specialized tools, LIKE MAGIC’s features are more streamlined and focused on automating the guest journey. If you need detailed maintenance or asset management, Quore’s extensive toolkit is better. For simplified guest and staff management, LIKE MAGIC’s targeted features may suffice.

Edge: Quore.

Which Has Better Customer Support: LIKE MAGIC or Quore?

LIKE MAGIC’s support scores are outstanding, rated 4.88/5, with reviews highlighting rapid responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users describe LIKE MAGIC support as “professional and quick to help,” emphasizing their focus on onboarding and ongoing guidance.

Quore’s support, rated 4.36/5, is still strong but slightly behind LIKE MAGIC. Some users note issues with slow response times and wish for more personalized assistance. Reviews suggest support is reliable but less personalized compared to LIKE MAGIC.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Has More Integrations: LIKE MAGIC or Quore?

LIKE MAGIC connects with 10 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SALTO Systems. Its open API allows for custom integrations, reducing manual data entry and increasing operational efficiency.

Quore integrates with 8 partners, such as Zingle, Revinate, and Canary Technologies, providing essential communication and guest review tools. However, its fewer verified integrations and lack of open API limit flexibility for complex property tech stacks.

If your hotel relies heavily on system integrations, LIKE MAGIC’s broader and more flexible options give it an edge. For hotels with simpler setups, Quore’s integration options are sufficient.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: LIKE MAGIC or Quore?

Despite being newer, LIKE MAGIC’s reviews are highly positive, with a 99% likelihood to recommend and a 9.94/10 NPS score based on only 16 reviews, 2 of which are recent. Users praise its ease of use, automation, and support, often mentioning transformative impacts like staff reduction and guest satisfaction.

Quore’s ratings are also good, especially among larger or branded hotels, with a 4.36/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend from 115 reviews, though none are recent. Users appreciate its detailed operational tools but point out onboarding challenges.

Given the recent surge in reviews and high satisfaction, LIKE MAGIC holds a clear advantage.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

How Much Do LIKE MAGIC and Quore Cost?

LIKE MAGIC is priced at a flat $1,100 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise focus and automation capabilities. Its higher price correlates with its comprehensive automation and integration features.

Quore’s base price is $200 per month, with no trial or freemium options. It’s more affordable, especially for smaller hotels or properties seeking specific management tools without extensive automation.

Your choice depends on your budget and whether you value automation over detailed operational management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use LIKE MAGIC?

  • Hotels that prioritize guest experience automation, like contactless check-in, messaging, and self-service amenities.
  • Properties aiming to reduce staffing needs, such as hotels with limited reception hours or lean teams.
  • Hotels seeking a unified platform to connect PMS, access, and guest communication systems.
  • Hotels that want continuous product evolution and responsiveness to changing needs.
  • Teams that prefer a mobile-first, intuitive interface with quick staff onboarding.

Not ideal if you need extensive asset or preventative maintenance management, as these features are limited.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Quore?

  • Hotels that require detailed operational management, including maintenance, work orders, and inventory tracking.
  • Larger hotels or resorts with multiple departments needing centralized oversight.
  • Properties with complex workflows that benefit from specialized tools like inspection modules or asset maintenance logs.
  • Hotels looking for a broad suite of features, including CapEx budgeting and deep cleaning modules.
  • Hotels with existing systems that can integrate easily with Quore’s partners.

Not ideal if your focus is purely guest automation or if your property is small and needs simple, cost-effective tools.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

LIKE MAGIC offers a streamlined, automation-focused platform that excels in guest journey management and staff efficiency. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores confirm it’s the more reliable and innovative option for modern hotels.

Choose LIKE MAGIC if your hotel aims to automate guest interactions, reduce staffing, and improve overall guest satisfaction through a simple, integrated platform. Its ease of use and support make it especially suitable for properties seeking quick deployment and high user adoption.

On the other hand, Quore provides an extensive set of operational tools for detailed property management. If your hotel requires comprehensive maintenance, work order tracking, and department control, Quore’s feature-rich suite might be more appropriate, despite its slower recent review cycle.

In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing guest automation and staff efficiency in 2024, LIKE MAGIC is the more compelling choice. For large or complex operations needing detailed management, Quore remains a solid, long-standing solution.

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Quore 的价格是多少?

员工协作工具 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
Starting Price From $1,100/mo From $200/mo

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 有哪些 Quore 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Quore 共享 6 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Quore Quore
失物招领模块
工作优先级
工单和票务
延迟退房
开放式 API
文件库支持(图像、文档和视频)
消息模板
移动应用
自动回复
资产维护日志
资本支出预算和预测
重复任务

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:LIKE MAGIC 对比 Quore(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
LIKE MAGIC The Zipper Hotel & Apartments 小型
+ 80% fewer staff while maintaining operational efficiency
+ 4.6/5 rating on Google, 8.8+ on Booking.com
+ Easy to understand and use - employees have fun to work with. Fully trained staff in just 1.5 days.

"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."

Quore Quore

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
LIKE MAGIC Stay Kooook 小型
+ Lean operations: Reduced staffing needs to 2.5 FTE for an 85-room property
+ Guest Journey adoption: Enabled 95% of guests to manage their entire stay digitally.
+ Decreased staff training time to under four hours for new employees.

"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."

Cedric Maderer
Cedric Maderer
Product Manager
Quore Quore

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Quore:总结

LIKE MAGIC
LIKE MAGIC
5.0/5 来自 16 条评价

排名更高的方面

小型(10-24 间客房) #7 vs #9
CH #2 vs #4
欧洲 #6 vs #15

独特功能

工作优先级 文件库支持(图像、文档和视频) 延迟退房 自动回复 消息模板
5.0/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 10 个集成
查看资料
Quore
Quore
4.6/5 来自 117 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

沟通效率 88% 正面

酒店经营者对 Quore 促进各部门无缝沟通、有效传递信息和缩短响应客户请求时间的能力表示赞赏。这大大减少了误解和延误,提高了整体团队协作和客户满意度。

追踪和报告 80% 正面

用户发现 Quore 的跟踪和报告功能对于维护各种操作的日志非常有用,包括客人请求、维护和库存。这些功能有助于保存详细记录,从而有助于提高酒店运营的责任感和... 用户发现 Quore 的跟踪和报告功能对于维护各种操作的日志非常有用,包括客人请求、维护和库存。这些功能有助于保存详细记录,从而有助于提高酒店运营的责任感和效率。

宾客信息和互动 64% 正面

酒店经营者对 Quore 的客户消息功能非常满意,该功能有助于直接与客户沟通并有效管理他们的请求。不过,一些用户建议进行改进,例如更好地与其他客户服务平台集... 酒店经营者对 Quore 的客户消息功能非常满意,该功能有助于直接与客户沟通并有效管理他们的请求。不过,一些用户建议进行改进,例如更好地与其他客户服务平台集成。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制 65% 负面

许多用户强调 Quore 需要更多自定义选项,例如修改报告字段、定制仪表板以及与其他物业管理系统集成。缺乏自定义有时会限制软件满足特定酒店需求的有效性。

培训和入职 53% 负面

一些评论强调了 Quore 培训和入职流程存在的问题。用户发现培训不足,有时不够直观,导致新员工的学习难度很大。这妨碍了软件的初步采用和有效使用。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #5 vs #19
中型(25-74 间客房) #6 vs #16
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #8 vs #14
住宿加早餐与客栈 #4 vs #18

独特功能

失物招领模块 资本支出预算和预测 工单和票务 重复任务 移动应用
4.4/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 8 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Quore 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
易用性 LIKE MAGIC 5.0 vs 4.4 (+0.6)
客户支持 LIKE MAGIC 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.5)
性价比 LIKE MAGIC 4.9 vs 4.2 (+0.8)
入职培训 LIKE MAGIC 4.9 vs 4.2 (+0.8)

关于 LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 与 Quore 的常见问题

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 能否替代 Quore?

这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Quore 共享许多核心 Staff Collaboration Tools 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 或 Quore 是否提供免费方案?

LIKE MAGIC (Staff App):否。Quore:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Staff Collaboration Tools 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Quore?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 0,Quore 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息