The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 886 条经验证的评价后,ManCloud 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's success. Both Lobbi Hotel Software by ManCloud and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and user feedback. Do you want a platform with more recent, extensive reviews and proven industry impact? Or are you considering a solution with a more limited review base but potentially niche benefits?
Lobbi Hotel Software by ManCloud is a lesser-known product with no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its real-world effectiveness. Conversely, Mews PMS boasts over 750 reviews, most from recent months, and holds a 4.62/5 rating, indicating strong, current user satisfaction.
While Lobbi aims to simplify bookings and operations, its lack of reviews and a score of 0/5 suggest unresolved issues or limited adoption. Mews, on the other hand, benefits from a robust community of hoteliers, with recent reviews praising its automation, integrations, and overall usability. Is your team ready to rely on a proven, well-supported platform?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS capable of handling complex operations, choose Mews. Its extensive features (44 exclusive to Mews, including booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and mobile apps) support diverse property types, from boutique hotels to large chains.
If your hotel requires a very simple, minimal system with basic booking and management, Lobbi might seem appealing. However, given Lobbi’s lack of recent reviews and the overwhelming positive feedback for Mews, the latter is the safer choice for scalability, support, and ongoing development.
Mews scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.7/5 rating based on 758 reviews, and most users describe its interface as modern, intuitive, and quick to learn. Recent reviews highlight the platform’s user-friendly onboarding and minimal training needs, especially for multi-property management.
Lobbi’s usability is not well-documented, and the absence of recent reviews makes it hard to confirm if it’s simpler than Mews. However, the consistent praise for Mews’ straightforward interface and support resources clearly favor it. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 44 features exclusive to its platform, such as revenue management, online check-in, guest messaging, integrated CRS, and a versatile marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. These features cater to modern, dynamic hotel operations.
Lobbi, with no additional features beyond basic booking management, appears limited. Its primary focus seems to be on administrative tasks rather than the comprehensive, automation-driven tools that Mews provides. Edge: Mews.
Mews is generally praised for its support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing swift, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Users appreciate the onboarding process, with some noting the responsiveness to bugs and feature requests.
Lobbi’s support reputation is not documented publicly, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its support quality is low. Given Mews’ proven support track record and extensive community feedback, it clearly has the advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 reviews and recent feedback, Mews’ property segment ratings average around 4.64/5, with boutique hotels, independents, and city-center hotels expressing strong satisfaction. The platform’s versatility and support resonate across different hotel types.
Lobbi’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Industry consensus and recent customer feedback strongly favor Mews, especially for properties seeking proven reliability and scalability. Edge: Mews.
Lobbi’s pricing is not publicly listed, which complicates a direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no free tier, but offers extensive features and integrations that justify the cost for many hotels.
While Lobbi may be cheaper or more flexible in pricing, the lack of transparency and proven value makes it difficult to assess. Considering Mews’s transparency and value, it remains the more reliable investment in the long run.
Given Lobbi’s limited feature set, it’s best suited for very small operations or startups testing small-scale management.
Not ideal if your property is extremely small with no plans for growth or automation, or if budget constraints prohibit a $900/month investment.
Mews stands out as the more proven, reviewed, and supported PMS, with a broad feature set and extensive integrations that cater to modern hospitality needs. Its strong recent review count and high satisfaction ratings make it a reliable choice.
Lobbi offers a minimal, possibly cost-effective alternative but lacks recent validation, features, or user feedback. For hotels aiming for operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and future growth, Mews is the safer, more strategic investment.
If your hotel prioritizes reliability, robust features, and ongoing support, choose Mews. Its mature ecosystem and proven user satisfaction make it the clear leader.
If your operation is very small with limited needs and a tight budget, Lobbi could be considered, but be aware of its untested status and limited functionality.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a long-term, effective PMS, Mews is the definitive choice. Its extensive reviews, current user satisfaction, and comprehensive capabilities set a standard few can match.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Lobbi Hotel Software 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lobbi Hotel Software 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lobbi Hotel Software:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ManCloud 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问