项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Luopan offers core PMS functionalities, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a user-friendly interface. Are you prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, or a flexible, unified system tailored for multi-property growth?
Luopan Arcas PMS, developed by Luopan in Beijing, aims to centralize hotel operations with a comprehensive property management approach. Its core features include reservations, front desk, night audit, and guest profiles, bundled into a single platform designed for medium to large hotels and hotel groups. Conversely, Mews PMS, headquartered in Amsterdam, boasts a broad, cloud-native ecosystem with over 335 verified integrations, serving hotel segments from boutique to large chains globally.
Where Luopan has a limited review presence, with no recent reviews or ratings, Mews benefits from over 759 reviews, with the latest in the past six months, indicating active user engagement. Mews’s recent reviews highlight a 4.62/5 overall rating, with ease of use and support receiving consistently high marks. The core distinction is that Mews has a proven track record of supporting scalability through automation, third-party integrations, and a modern interface, while Luopan’s user feedback remains unavailable or outdated. Would you prefer a platform with a substantial, recent user base or one still establishing its reputation?
If your hotel needs a centralized, multi-property management system with core PMS features and a focus on traditional workflows, Luopan could be suitable—though it lacks recent user reviews or ratings to validate performance. For hotels seeking a scalable, highly-integrated system that supports automation, guest engagement, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive third-party integrations and positive recent reviews make it more adaptable for modern hospitality demands.
For boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease and innovation, Mews’s user interface and support network are highly valued, especially with a 4.27/5 customer support rating. Conversely, if you’re a larger hotel group looking for a consolidated, yet less tested platform with core PMS functionalities, Luopan might appeal—though the absence of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and evolution.
Mews excels here, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users frequently mention how fast their teams learn the system, with many noting that Mews is built for simplicity and efficiency. Luopan, on the other hand, offers no recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability or onboarding experience.
Based on available data, Mews’s onboarding scores of 4.39/5 and detailed user praise place it ahead for staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Mews.
Mews outshines with 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in/out, task management, and mobile apps. These features are designed to support a fully digital, guest-centric experience and operational automation. Luopan offers core PMS functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set and open API capabilities seen in Mews.
Furthermore, Mews’s features cater to modern hospitality needs, including contactless check-in, guest messaging, integrated POS, and sophisticated reporting—details that are absent or unlisted for Luopan. The clear edge: Mews.
Mews’s support reputation is strong, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating and many recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing use. Users mention that support is prompt, with some noting quick bug resolution and proactive communication. Luopan, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality, leaving its support level uncertain.
Given Mews’s active support team and recent positive feedback, the edge goes to Mews.
Mews boasts 335 verified integrations, including over 1,000 in its Marketplace, linking to revenue management, POS, channel managers, ID scanners, marketing, and more. It supports seamless connectivity with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, enabling flexible customization. Luopan, by contrast, has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or unverified integration network.
The extensive integrations and API openness give Mews a significant advantage for hotels seeking a versatile, connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.
While Luopan has no recent reviews or ratings, Mews’s latest data shows a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 759 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its ease of use and support. Mews’s favorable reviews span boutique, independent, and branded properties, often highlighting its simplicity and automation benefits.
Without recent Luopan user data, the explicit rating advantage is clear—Mews’s active user base and high ratings tilt the balance firmly in its favor. Edge: Mews.
Luopan does not publicly list its pricing or offer trial information, which complicates direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, but exact pricing can vary based on hotel size and needs.
In general, Mews’s transparent pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, while Luopan’s lack of published prices suggests a potential for custom quotes, often typical in enterprise solutions. Budget considerations favor Mews, given its straightforward model.
Luopan offers a traditional, core PMS experience with basic functionalities suited to established hotel management but lacks recent validation or broad integrations. Mews provides a modern, cloud-based ecosystem with extensive features, integrations, and a strong recent user review base, emphasizing automation and scalability.
Opt for Luopan if your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized PMS in a large property or group setting and you prefer a system with a long-standing reputation, even if unverified by recent user feedback. Its core functionalities may suffice for operations focused on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.
Choose Mews if your hotel seeks a flexible, automation-driven platform capable of supporting growth across multiple locations. Its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and modern features make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations.
Mews is the stronger platform, given its active, recent reviews, high overall ratings, and broad feature set. The platform's focus on automation, integrations, and user experience positions it as the better choice for most hotels looking to modernize and scale.
If your hotel values proven engagement and a widely adopted system, Mews is the clear leader. For those needing a simpler, traditional PMS with a focus on core functionalities, Luopan may suffice—though the lack of recent validation suggests caution. Overall, Mews’s proven track record and active user base make it the recommended choice for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个主要的主题是 Mews 直观、现代,团队易于学习,使入职培训和日常使用比传统 PMS 系统更简便。用户常说新员工能快速上手,但仍有少部分人觉得某些高级工作流... 一个主要的主题是 Mews 直观、现代,团队易于学习,使入职培训和日常使用比传统 PMS 系统更简便。用户常说新员工能快速上手,但仍有少部分人觉得某些高级工作流程或设置不够直观。
评审者反复提到,Mews 自动化了预订、入住、开票、支付和客房服务等酒店日常工作,减少了人工操作和错误。许多评论指出,这使员工可以花更多时间与客人互动,并... 评审者反复提到,Mews 自动化了预订、入住、开票、支付和客房服务等酒店日常工作,减少了人工操作和错误。许多评论指出,这使员工可以花更多时间与客人互动,并帮助酒店在繁忙时期更高效地运营。
Mews因其与POS、RMS、支付供应商、渠道管理软件和定制工具的连接能力而受到一致好评,许多用户称赞其开放API。买家应注意,虽然生态系统强大,但某些所需的集成... Mews因其与POS、RMS、支付供应商、渠道管理软件和定制工具的连接能力而受到一致好评,许多用户称赞其开放API。买家应注意,虽然生态系统强大,但某些所需的集成仍需额外工作,或在特定用例中完全缺失。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
报告是讨论最多的领域之一,许多用户希望拥有更可定制的仪表盘、更好的导出功能,以及更强的财务和运营分析。虽然一些评价赞扬其商业智能/分析的深度,但许多评... 报告是讨论最多的领域之一,许多用户希望拥有更可定制的仪表盘、更好的导出功能,以及更强的财务和运营分析。虽然一些评价赞扬其商业智能/分析的深度,但许多评论指出报告可能令人困惑、不完整、不一致,或对于多酒店和会计需求来说过于有限。
账单和支付自动化是 Mews 最受重视的优势之一,特别是在自动收费、POS 房价同步以及减少人工操作的支付流程方面。同时,评测者反复提到发票拆分、退款、贷记通知... 账单和支付自动化是 Mews 最受重视的优势之一,特别是在自动收费、POS 房价同步以及减少人工操作的支付流程方面。同时,评测者反复提到发票拆分、退款、贷记通知单、卡片处理以及费用透明度等痛点。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Luopan Arcas PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Luopan Arcas PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Luopan Arcas PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Luopan 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐