Luopan Arcas PMS vs. Mews PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 2026年11月10日  ·  已分析 959 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 959 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

Luopan 凭借在前提等独家功能脱颖而出。

Mews 在支持入职和客户成功方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有客户关系管理以及客人资料等独家功能。

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Luopan Arcas PMS 与 Mews PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 959 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
99
推荐可能性
暂无
92%
易用性
暂无
4.7/5
客户支持
暂无
4.3/5
性价比
暂无
4.4/5
起始价格 联系销售 起价 $900/月
经验证的评价 0 959

Luopan Arcas PMS 与 Mews PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 959 条经验证的评价后,Luopan 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 支持入职和客户成功, 易用性和直观界面, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
优点
+ 支持入职和客户成功 ▾
+ 易用性和直观界面 ▾
+ 自动化与工作流程效率 ▾
+ 宾客旅程与自助服务 ▾
缺点
− 账单开具与支付 ▾
− 报告与分析 ▾
− 多酒店及集团管理 ▾

Luopan 对比 Mews:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ — #3 363 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ — #1 386 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ — #2 80 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ — #3 49 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
精品酒店 ▾ — #2 505 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ — #5 238 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ — #2 181 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ — #1 139 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
北美 ▾ — #8 110 条评价
欧洲 ▾ — #1 714 条评价
亚太 ▾ — #10 17 条评价
中东 ▾ — #30 8 条评价

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Better for Hotels?

Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS offer distinct approaches to property management that appeal to different hotel profiles. Luopan targets mid-sized to large hotels, hotel groups, and serviced apartments, emphasizing a unified ecosystem that integrates front desk, back-office, and guest engagement processes into one platform. Mews caters broadly to properties of all sizes but is particularly favored by boutique hotels, hostels, and small to medium-sized portfolios with a strong emphasis on automation and guest self-service.

Both platforms address core hotel challenges such as streamlining reservations, improving operational workflows, and enhancing guest experiences. Luopan’s strength lies in its comprehensive, mobile-first operational tools and multi-property centralization, while Mews excels in automation, an expansive integration ecosystem, and a modern guest journey that reduces front desk workload.

Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If you operate a mid-sized to large hotel, a serviced apartment complex, or a group of properties seeking a single data backbone for all operations, Luopan Arcas PMS is designed for your needs. Its on-premise capabilities and spa & wellness module support complex operations and multi-department integration, although independent evidence of customer satisfaction is absent due to lack of reviews.

Conversely, if you run a boutique hotel, hostel, or small-to-medium portfolio aiming for rapid digital transformation, scalability, and operational automation, Mews PMS is the data-backed choice. Its 4.6/5 rating across 959 user reviews, including 82 in the last six months with a 4.4/5 score, reflects strong, consistent satisfaction. Its multi-lingual, multi-currency support and guest CRM functionalities further suit diverse international properties. However, review data for Luopan is currently unavailable, limiting direct comparison on user experience and support.

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Easier to Use?

Only Mews has verified ease of use and onboarding ratings, scoring 4.7/5 and 4.4/5 respectively across hundreds of reviews. Users consistently mention an intuitive interface that shortens training time for front desk and housekeeping staff, enabling smoother daily operations. Specific praise includes Mews Academy’s structured training and a modern, visually clear dashboard. Luopan lacks publicly available user feedback, so usability claims rest on vendor descriptions rather than verified experience.

Given the absence of Luopan user reviews versus Mews’ strong ease-of-use metrics and positive qualitative feedback, this category favors Mews but cannot conclusively declare superiority without Luopan data.

Edge: Even.

Which Has Better Features: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Luopan Arcas PMS offers unique features such as an on-premise deployment option and a specialized spa & wellness module, which support hotels with complex wellness services or data residency requirements. This can be crucial for properties with strict compliance needs or those that want hybrid cloud architectures.

Mews PMS provides seven unique features absent in Luopan, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, a guest CRM and profiles system, centralized messaging, a drag-and-drop tape chart for room management, and SOC2 compliance, which assures data security standards. These features directly improve guest communication workflows, front desk efficiency, and international operation capabilities.

While both share 52 core PMS features, Mews’ additional capabilities enhance guest engagement and operational flexibility, especially for multi-national and multi-property setups.

Edge: Mews PMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Customer support ratings are only available for Mews PMS, which scores 4.3/5 in support and 4.4/5 in onboarding. Reviewers commonly highlight responsive account managers, thorough onboarding processes, and strong training resources. Some criticism notes occasional delays in ticket responses and reliance on chat support, but these issues are balanced by swift issue resolution and dedicated personal assistance.

Luopan has no verified customer reviews to assess support quality, making any comparison impossible beyond vendor claims. The breadth of Mews’ global presence and large customer base further supports its ability to maintain consistent support.

Edge: Even.

Which Has More Integrations: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews PMS leads integration capabilities with 352 verified partners, including critical solutions like Criton, Right Revenue, and FLEXIPASS keyless mobile access. This extensive ecosystem supports diverse operational needs from revenue management to guest access control, making Mews suitable for properties requiring customization and rapid tech stack expansion.

Luopan currently has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with external systems. This absence restricts flexibility for hotels that rely on specialized third-party applications or seek future scalability.

Edge: Mews PMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews PMS holds a 4.6/5 overall rating based on 959 reviews, with 82 recent reviews maintaining a strong 4.4/5, indicating stable, current user satisfaction. Its likelihood to recommend stands at 92%. Ratings are consistent across hotel segments such as boutique hotels (4.6/5, 526 reviews), hostels (4.7/5, 168 reviews), and limited service hotels (4.6/5, 248 reviews).

Luopan lacks any publicly available user ratings or reviews. This absence precludes objective comparison and suggests a lack of market presence or user feedback transparency.

Edge: Even.

How Much Do Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS Cost?

Luopan Arcas PMS does not publish pricing information, nor does it offer free trials or clear fee structures, complicating budget planning for potential buyers. Mews PMS charges a base price of $900, with no freemium or per-room monthly fees disclosed. Mews does not offer a trial but provides onboarding support included in its pricing. The transparent pricing of Mews allows for clearer financial assessment, while Luopan’s costs remain opaque.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Luopan Arcas PMS?

  • Hotels that require a unified system integrating front desk, back-office, and guest engagement in a single platform.
  • Mid-sized to large hotels or serviced apartment complexes aiming for scalable multi-property management.
  • Properties needing on-premise deployment or specialized spa & wellness management modules.
  • Hotels looking for mobile-first operational tools to empower staff across departments.

Not ideal if:

  • You prioritize proven customer support and user satisfaction data.
  • Your property depends heavily on third-party integrations or customization.
  • You seek transparent pricing or trial access before commitment.
  • Your hotel operates internationally with multi-currency and multi-lingual needs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews PMS?

  • Boutique hotels, hostels, and small to medium hotel portfolios seeking an intuitive, modern PMS.
  • Properties aiming to automate routine tasks such as check-in/out, billing, and guest communications.
  • Hotels requiring extensive integrations for payments, channel management, keyless entry, and revenue management.
  • Operators wanting a flexible platform with multi-lingual and multi-currency support.
  • Hotels that benefit from a well-documented onboarding process and responsive customer support.

Not ideal if:

  • You need on-premise deployment capabilities.
  • Your hotel depends on a dedicated spa & wellness module integrated into the PMS.
  • You require a free trial or transparent pricing per room or flat rate beyond the base price.

Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS serve distinct segments of the hotel market with different priorities. Luopan offers a comprehensive, integrated platform suited to mid-sized and large properties seeking centralized control with mobile-first tools and specific modules like spa & wellness, but lacks publicly available user feedback, integration breadth, and pricing transparency.

Mews PMS stands out for its extensive user base, validated high ratings across hotel segments, and a rich ecosystem of 352 integrations. It emphasizes automation and guest self-service, enabling hotels to reduce manual workloads and improve operational efficiency. Mews’ clear pricing and strong support provide buyers with confidence and scalability.

Choose Luopan if your property demands on-premise deployment, spa & wellness integration, and a unified operational system for a larger property or group. Choose Mews if you value proven user experience, a broad integration marketplace, operational automation, and multi-property flexibility supported by extensive hotelier feedback.

Luopan Arcas PMS 和 Mews PMS 的价格是多少?

酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
起始价格 — 起价 $900/月

功能对比:Luopan Arcas PMS 与 Mews PMS

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
▾ 会计与金融
100%
100%
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
多币种
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
自动夜间审计
▾ 营销与电子商务
100%
100%
访客通信(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
客人资料
客户关系管理
礼品卡
频道管理员
预订引擎
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 管理和配置
100%
75%
集中的用户和角色管理
多种语言
基于云
在前提
▾ 用户管理
75%
100%
访客通信(短信)
客人资料
集中消息传递
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 前台
84%
92%
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用
自动夜间审计
日历视图
多种语言
任务管理
自动提醒
客人资料
平板电脑/自助服务终端值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
▾ 群组管理
100%
100%
组功能
自动空间优化
▾ 宾客体验
100%
100%
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用
网上值机
在线结帐
来宾消息
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
身份证扫描和注册预填
大堂售货亭
▾ 家政
100%
100%
管家模块
家政移动应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班计划
员工信息
在线结帐
▾ 付款
100%
100%
集成支付终端和读卡器
直接计费
多币种
交付过程
付款请求
▾ 预订管理
89%
100%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 收入管理
100%
100%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
收益管理模块
基本定价
▾ 税务与合规
75%
100%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR
SOC2 投诉
税务配置
▾ 支持与培训
100%
100%
在线 24/7 支持
▾ 食品与饮料
100%
100%
EPoS
▾ 温泉
100%
0%
水疗和健康模块

实际成果:Luopan 对比 Mews(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Luopan Luopan

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Episode Tbilisi 小型
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
提高运营效率
Luopan Luopan

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Aplend Apartments 中型
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
改善宾客体验
Luopan Luopan

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Leven Manchester 小型
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Luopan 对比 Mews:总结

Luopan
Luopan
0 条评价

独特功能

在前提 水疗和健康模块
0 个集成
查看资料
Mews
Mews
4.6/5 来自 959 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

支持入职和客户成功 72% 正面

支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、... 支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、升级路径不畅,或支持过于依赖聊天和文章。

易用性和直观界面 84% 正面

一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设... 一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设置会增加复杂性。

自动化与工作流程效率 80% 正面

用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够... 用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够更多地专注于宾客服务,并以更少的错误和更少的文书工作管理酒店。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

账单开具与支付 61% 负面

许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和... 许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和会计对账等方面仍需改进。

报告与分析 64% 负面

报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层... 报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层仍然感觉不够一致,难以定制,或者过于依赖导出到Excel。

独特功能

多种语言 多币种 客户关系管理 客人资料 集中消息传递
4.7/5 易用性 4.3/5 客户支持 352 个集成
访问官网

关于 Luopan Arcas PMS 与 Mews PMS 的常见问题

Luopan Arcas PMS 能否替代 Mews PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Luopan Arcas PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Luopan Arcas PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

Luopan Arcas PMS 或 Mews PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Luopan Arcas PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Luopan Arcas PMS 和 Mews PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Luopan 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息