The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 158 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and On premise.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue Management Module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 158 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 100 |
在分析了 158 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能, 培训和文档,而 roommaster 用户则强调 预订管理, 集中式数据管理, 云和移动访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
+
Ampliphi 的定价建议
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #41 7 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 35 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 11 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 4 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #25 26 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) depends on your hotel’s unique needs, budget, and growth plans. Maestro PMS and roommaster PMS both address core operational challenges but diverge significantly in features, support, and scalability. Maestro’s extensive module offering and recent reviews suggest it’s better suited for complex, multi-property, or upscale hotels, while roommaster’s simpler, more affordable platform appeals to independent or smaller chains. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Both Maestro PMS and roommaster PMS aim to streamline hotel operations, centralize data, and improve guest experiences. Maestro offers a comprehensive suite with 48 shared features and 10 unique modules, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and contactless check-in, designed for larger or multi-property hotels. Roommaster, with slightly fewer features and an easier interface, targets independent hotels and small chains, focusing on reservation management and real-time reporting.
Recent reviews favor roommaster’s higher overall rating (83 reviews with 91% recommending it) over Maestro’s 56 reviews and 88% recommendation rate, highlighting its more recent support and active user base. Maestro’s reviews note strengths in customization and support but also mention a dated UI and complex workflows. Roommaster’s users praise its simplicity, low learning curve, and affordability, but some call for better reporting tools and language options. Which system will best serve your property’s structure and future growth?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly customizable system with extensive modules for catering, spa, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support, Maestro PMS is the superior choice. Its strong presence among luxury resorts and multi-property groups makes it ideal for complex operations requiring deep integration and advanced features. Conversely, if your hotel is a small to mid-sized independent property seeking an affordable, easy-to-manage system with essential reservation, housekeeping, and reporting functions, roommaster PMS fits better.
For hotels prioritizing extensive modules and global reach, Maestro’s 89 verified integration partners and feature-rich platform provide a robust infrastructure. If quick onboarding, simple workflows, and immediate operational improvements are your focus, roommaster’s 56 partners and streamlined interface deliver tangible value. Your decision hinges on complexity versus simplicity and scale versus cost.
Ease of use is crucial for staff adoption and operational efficiency. Maestro PMS boasts a 4.04/5 UX rating, with users appreciating its comprehensive dashboards and mobile apps but citing a need for a more modern interface. Support is highly rated (4.78/5), with praise for quick responses and helpful training, but some find the system cumbersome due to too many clicks and screens.
Roommaster outperforms slightly on usability, with a 4.22/5 rating and a simpler, drag-and-drop reservation interface. Users note its intuitive design, quick staff onboarding, and cloud accessibility. Support ratings are lower (4.25/5), with some reports of delays or inconsistent assistance. Overall, edge: roommaster.
Maestro’s unique features include a dedicated Spa & Wellness module, ancillary revenue tracking, mobile notes & tasks, Tablet/Kiosk check-ins, and housekeeper mobile apps—adding depth for full-service hotels. It also supports multi-currency and multi-lingual operations, with 10 features exclusive to Maestro.
Roommaster’s strength lies in its core reservation management, automated guest communications, and over 270 built-in reports—focusing on operational efficiency. It offers key features like revenue management, a booking engine, POS, and guest feedback modules, absent in Maestro. The choice depends on whether you need niche modules or a broad, integrated platform. Edge: Maestro, given its broader feature set.
Support quality influences ongoing success. Maestro PMS users consistently rate support highly (4.78/5), citing quick resolution, availability via phone, chat, and email, and strong ongoing support. Reviewers emphasize Maestro’s Diamond Plus Service and dedicated onboarding, especially for complex setups.
Roommaster support, rated 4.25/5, is praised for responsiveness but sometimes criticized for inconsistency and limited help over the phone. Some users report delays and difficulty resolving issues quickly. Given the recent reviews and higher ratings, edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS boasts 89 verified partnerships, including integrations with Criton, Unifocus, and Bookassist, enabling extensive customization and third-party connectivity. It supports integrations with popular booking engines, GDS systems, and payment providers, facilitating complex multi-system setups.
Roommaster, with 56 verified partners, also supports vital integrations like OTAs, channel managers, and POS systems, but offers fewer options for niche or advanced systems. For hotels seeking a wide ecosystem, Maestro’s larger integration network is advantageous. Edge: Maestro PMS.
Recent reviews reveal roommaster PMS’s higher overall rating (83 reviews, 91% recommend) compared to Maestro (56 reviews, 88%). Hoteliers in the independent and mid-sized segments prefer roommaster’s straightforward interface and quicker support response times.
Maestro’s users, mostly larger or luxury properties, appreciate its comprehensive modules and customization, but some mention the UI’s dated look and complex workflows. In terms of recent feedback and user satisfaction, edge: roommaster PMS.
Maestro PMS costs start at $900 for the base license, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees, though implementation costs are not specified. Its high feature count and support services imply a premium price point, suitable for larger properties.
Roommaster’s license is $500, with no recurring monthly fees or implementation charges publicly listed. Its lower cost makes it more accessible for small hotels or independent operators. Pricing transparency favors roommaster for budget-conscious hotels, while Maestro’s value is in extensive features.
Maestro PMS is a broad, feature-rich platform ideal for larger, multi-property, or upscale hotels that need extensive customization and integration. Its recent reviews showcase strong support, robust modules, and high user satisfaction from larger properties, making it a compelling choice for complex operations.
Roommaster PMS excels in delivering a simple, cost-effective solution for small to mid-sized hotels, with a focus on reservation management, automation, and ease of use. Its higher recent ratings and active support network make it more suitable for properties seeking quick wins and straightforward operation.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable system with advanced modules, go with Maestro PMS. If simplicity, affordability, and fast onboarding are priorities, roommaster PMS should be your choice. Either way, align the system with your specific operational scale and future growth plans for the best results.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 roommaster PMS 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 70,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问