项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,016 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 在客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.5/5),并拥有在前提以及移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)等独家功能。
Mews 在易用性方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有客户关系管理以及客人资料等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 1,016 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 958 |
在分析了 1,016 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 Mews 用户则强调 支持入职和客户成功, 易用性和直观界面, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
支持入职和客户成功
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
宾客旅程与自助服务
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
账单开具与支付
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
−
多酒店及集团管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 34 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 4 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #26 26 条评价 | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 31 条评价 | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Maestro PMS (Northwind) and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Maestro PMS offers a more traditional, feature-rich setup, while Mews emphasizes automation, scalability, and a modern user experience. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and strengths differ markedly—how will your property benefit most?
If your hotel prioritizes cutting-edge automation and extensive third-party integrations, Mews’s cloud-native platform makes a compelling case. Conversely, for highly customizable modules and multi-property support with a longer history, Maestro PMS might be more aligned. Are you ready to make the right choice?
Maestro PMS and Mews PMS both streamline hotel operations, but they solve different problems. Maestro’s on-premise or cloud model offers deep customization and broad module support for complex, multi-property, or luxury resorts, with over 20 integrated modules and a focus on detailed reporting.
Mews, however, targets modern hotels seeking automation and flexibility, with real-time data, over 1,000 integrations via its marketplace, and a user-friendly interface. While Maestro’s support is highly praised for its responsiveness, Mews’s recent reviews emphasize its ease of use and quick onboarding, with 98 recent reviews compared to Maestro’s 56.
Do these contrasting strengths influence your decision?
If your property needs a cloud-based solution with high scalability, frequent updates, and a rich ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It’s especially ideal for hotels that value automation, contactless check-in, and open API access, making it a strong fit for properties aiming to modernize and grow quickly.
If, however, your hotel requires extensive customization, detailed reporting, and modules like Spa & Wellness or multi-property management from the same system, Maestro PMS’s longer track record and comprehensive features may serve you better. For boutique, resort, or multi-property groups prioritizing flexibility, Maestro’s dedicated modules are advantageous.
In summary, for tech-forward, scalable growth, choose Mews. For tailored, detailed operations with a focus on customization, Maestro offers a compelling alternative.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding—"Mews is the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market," states a user. Its cloud-based design allows staff to log in from anywhere, and its onboarding process is often completed within days, with support praised for responsiveness.
Maestro, on the other hand, has a 4.04/5 rating, with reviews noting that its modules, while feature-rich, can feel cumbersome to navigate and require more clicks—"The modules are a little cumbersome to navigate for newer employees." Support is highly rated, yet some users find the UI somewhat dated and less streamlined.
Edge: Mews.
Maestro PMS offers 58 unique features, including specialized modules like Spa & Wellness and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks—features not available in Mews. Its comprehensive suite covers front office, sales & catering, golf, spa, and multi-property management.
Mews, however, has 55 unique features, excelling with multi-lingual support, guest CRM, guest profiles, and robust automation tools. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, allowing rapid addition of functionalities and third-party apps.
Edge: Mews, due to its extensive integrations and modern features.
Maestro PMS’s 4.78/5 customer support rating reflects a long-standing reputation for 24/7 support, quick responses, and dedicated education services—"Support is always available, quick to respond." Many reviews praise their support team’s responsiveness and willingness to assist.
Mews’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.27/5, with some recent reviews mentioning occasional bugs but quick resolution—"Their support team resolves issues rapidly and keeps disruptions minimal." Customers value the proactive support, but some note that support can occasionally be inconsistent.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Mews leads significantly with 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through the Marketplace, with common partners like Criton and Zaplox. It excels at connecting with revenue management, POS, and channel management tools, supporting modern tech ecosystems.
Maestro PMS offers 89 verified partners, including specialized integrations like Zingle, Guestware, and Inntopia, focusing more on property-specific modules. While sufficient for many hotels, its ecosystem isn’t as expansive as Mews’s.
Edge: Mews.
Mews garners a higher overall rating of 4.62/5, with 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 758 reviews—more recent reviews (98 in the last 6 months) reinforce its popularity. Hotels of all sizes, from hostels to boutique hotels, praise Mews for its ease of use and automation.
Maestro’s rating is 4.36/5 from 56 reviews, with an 88% recommendation rate. Its users, often from luxury or resort properties, appreciate its deep features but note UI and usability can be less intuitive.
Edge: Mews.
Both products share a base price of $900, with no freemium versions, optional monthly fees, or implementation costs listed publicly. Pricing models suggest a straightforward flat fee, but detailed ongoing costs or added modules may vary.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision should focus on value derived from features, support, and integration capabilities rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid deployment, frequent upgrades, or a highly intuitive, modern platform.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or highly specialized modules that are only available in legacy systems.
Mews stands out for its user-friendly, cloud-native approach, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of adoption and modern features. Its ecosystem of integrations and automation tools suit hotels looking to innovate and scale rapidly.
Maestro offers a more traditional, customizable system suitable for properties with complex operational requirements and multi-property management needs. Its support and detailed modules make it ideal for luxury or resort hotels that value depth over speed of deployment.
If your hotel values simplicity, automation, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. If you need extensive customization, detailed reporting, and multi-property control, Maestro provides a solid, long-standing platform.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、... 支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、升级路径不畅,或支持过于依赖聊天和文章。
一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设... 一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设置会增加复杂性。
用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够... 用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够更多地专注于宾客服务,并以更少的错误和更少的文书工作管理酒店。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和... 许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和会计对账等方面仍需改进。
报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层... 报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层仍然感觉不够一致,难以定制,或者过于依赖导出到Excel。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS 提供 87 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 75,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐