项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 470 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) .
基于 HTR 上 470 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 412 |
在分析了 470 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 支持响应速度和问题解决, 易用性与运营效率, 多酒店管理与扩展性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
支持响应速度和问题解决
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
易用性与运营效率
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
多酒店管理与扩展性
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
价格与可用性管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
产品改进和功能更新
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
日历功能与自定义
▾
|
|
−
报告和导出限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your primary goal is to streamline operations while enhancing guest experiences. Maestro PMS and ThinkReservations both aim to solve these issues, but they differ significantly in scope, usability, and support. Maestro offers extensive modules and customization for large or complex properties, while ThinkReservations emphasizes simplicity and rapid deployment. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size and operational needs?
Maestro PMS is a robust, all-in-one solution designed for multi-property groups, luxury resorts, and independent hotels that require extensive customization and integration. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, caters primarily to small boutiques, B&Bs, and independents seeking an easy-to-use platform with strong OTA connectivity. Do you need the broad feature set and flexibility of Maestro, or the straightforward, user-friendly interface of ThinkReservations?
Maestro boasts a deeper feature set—over 20 unique modules including spa, revenue management, and integrated CRM—making it suitable for hotels with complex operations. ThinkReservations offers a leaner system, with 39 shared features that prioritize straightforward booking, payment processing, and guest communication. Does your property benefit from extensive modules or from simplicity?
In recent reviews, ThinkReservations has more recent feedback—4 new reviews in the last six months versus Maestro’s zero—which means its user experience is fresh and evolving. Maestro’s older reviews reflect high overall support ratings but indicate some UI and report limitations, like inability to run historical reports. Which platform’s support and update frequency better serve your needs?
Edge: ThinkReservations.
If your hotel operates as a small or boutique property, especially in B&Bs or independent hotels, ThinkReservations is the more suitable choice. Its ease of use, quick onboarding, and strong OTA integrations (including Airbnb and Expedia) make it ideal for properties looking to grow revenue without complex customization. Many users highlight how effortless the transition was, and the system’s intuitive interface has earned a 4.82/5 ease-of-use rating from recent reviews.
Conversely, if your hotel is a large resort, multi-property group, or luxury boutique requiring extensive modules like revenue management, CRM, or on-premise support, Maestro PMS provides those capabilities. Its 19 unique features exclusive to Maestro—such as guest CRM, online checkout, and mobile apps—are tailored for properties with complex operational needs, though it comes at a higher price point ($900 vs $500).
For hotels prioritizing rapid deployment and guest communication, ThinkReservations’ automation and upselling features can boost revenue quickly. If customization and detailed reporting are critical, Maestro’s flexible modules and support for multiple integrations will better serve your team. Which profile matches your property’s size and complexity?
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations has a consistent 4.82/5 rating for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive layout, quick onboarding, and straightforward reservation management. Many users mention how it feels like “adding another employee” due to its automation features, with minimal training needed. Recent reviews reflect ongoing improvements, making it still more user-friendly than Maestro.
Maestro PMS, with a 4.04/5 ease rating, offers comprehensive functionality but receives criticism for its navigation, citing “too many clicks” and a dated UI that can slow down staff, especially newcomers. Its onboarding score of 4.73/5 is solid but lags behind ThinkReservations’ recent momentum. Support is rated highly but some users wish for a more modern, simplified interface.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Maestro PMS offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including Spa & Wellness modules, revenue management, online checkout, guest CRM, and mobile apps—providing a full-stack property solution. ThinkReservations has 39 shared features, mainly focusing on booking, payment processing, and guest communication, but lacks those specialized modules.
ThinkReservations’ strength lies in its automation, integrations with OTAs, and built-in upsell prompts, which have driven measurable revenue increases for users. Maestro’s dedicated modules for on-premise operations, guest engagement, and security are beneficial for properties needing detailed control and customization.
Given the 39 shared features—such as automated messaging, online booking, and channel management—ThinkReservations leads in operational simplicity. Maestro excels when you need a comprehensive, multi-module platform for complex operations. Which features are most critical for your property?
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Maestro PMS supports its clients with a 4.78/5 customer support rating, with many reviews praising their quick, 24/7 availability, and technical assistance. Their Diamond Plus Service is well-regarded, providing ongoing support and training, especially valued by large or group properties.
ThinkReservations has a slightly higher support rating at 4.82/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, knowledgeable responses and easy access to support staff who understand the platform deeply. Multiple users describe it as “like adding another employee,” highlighting the personal touch and reliability of support.
Support quality is crucial; Maestro’s long-standing reputation and enterprise support appeal to larger properties, while ThinkReservations’ recent reviews suggest a more responsive, modern support experience. Which support style aligns with your operational needs?
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Maestro PMS integrates with 89 verified partners, including specialized modules and global solutions like Criton, Volo, and Inntopia, making it suitable for complex operations requiring extensive system connectivity. It shares seven partners with ThinkReservations, such as TripAdvisor, TrustYou, and OpenKey.
ThinkReservations supports 16 verified integrations, including Airbnb, Expedia, Stripe, and HotelTonight. While fewer than Maestro, its focus on major OTAs and channel managers simplifies connectivity for small and mid-sized properties aiming to maximize online distribution.
If extensive third-party connections are vital, Maestro’s 89 integrations give it an edge. For properties prioritizing OTA connections and straightforward integration, ThinkReservations’ 16 are sufficient. Which set of integrations is more aligned with your property?
Edge: Maestro PMS.
ThinkReservations enjoys a significantly higher overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 356 reviews, with recent feedback praising its ease of use, automation, and customer support. It also has a higher likelihood to recommend score at 97%, reflecting strong satisfaction among small hotels and B&Bs, especially in North America.
Maestro’s overall rating is 4.36/5 from 56 reviews, with older feedback emphasizing its comprehensive features and support but noting UI and reporting limitations. Recent reviews are scarce, so the latest hotel perceptions lean toward ThinkReservations.
For property types like B&Bs and small hotels, recent reviews favor ThinkReservations’ usability and support. Larger or multi-property hotels attribute value to Maestro’s broader feature set, but its ratings are older.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Maestro PMS’s base price is $900, with no freemium, monthly flat rate, or per-room charges, reflecting its enterprise positioning. Implementation costs are included in the base fee, but additional modules or customizations may incur extra costs.
ThinkReservations charges a $500 base price with no additional fees for monthly or per-room charges, making it more accessible for smaller properties. It does not specify additional costs for upgrades or integrations but may have fees for extra features like ThinkMessenger.
If your budget is tight or your property is small, ThinkReservations offers a more straightforward, lower-cost option. For larger properties with complex needs, Maestro’s higher price may justify its extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Maestro is best for large, complex operations that need flexibility and detailed control, especially if they value integration and support.
Not ideal if your property:
ThinkReservations suits small to mid-sized properties focused on operational efficiency and guest experience.
Maestro PMS delivers an all-in-one, highly customizable platform suited for large, complex properties or multi-property groups. Its suite of 19 exclusive features and extensive integrations justify its higher price point for properties with demanding operational needs.
ThinkReservations shines for small hotels and B&Bs seeking a user-friendly, fast-deploying PMS that enhances revenue with automation and OTA connections. Its high user ratings and recent reviews point to a system that’s evolving quickly and satisfying its core users.
If your property requires deep customization, extensive modules, and multi-property support, Maestro is the clear choice. Alternatively, if simplicity, affordability, and strong guest communication tools are your priorities, ThinkReservations is the better fit.
In summary, choose Maestro PMS if your hotel demands a comprehensive, flexible system and you’re prepared for a higher investment. Opt for ThinkReservations if you prioritize ease of use, rapid deployment, and cost-effective operations.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户一致评价ThinkReservations的支持团队反应迅速、专业且高度响应,常提到有真人协助、全天候服务以及快速解决问题。评论者表示这减少了系统停机时间,避免了... 用户一致评价ThinkReservations的支持团队反应迅速、专业且高度响应,常提到有真人协助、全天候服务以及快速解决问题。评论者表示这减少了系统停机时间,避免了等待电话的时间,并增强了他们对问题能快速、正确解决的信心。
评测者经常表示 ThinkReservations 易于使用,简化日常运营,节省酒店管理日常任务的时间。该平台被描述为直观流畅,帮助员工更高效地管理预订和工作流程,减少... 评测者经常表示 ThinkReservations 易于使用,简化日常运营,节省酒店管理日常任务的时间。该平台被描述为直观流畅,帮助员工更高效地管理预订和工作流程,减少手动操作。
多位评审提到,ThinkReservations 在多家酒店中运行良好,能够支持从单一客栈到其他微型度假村或其他地点的扩展。这使其对需要无需增加复杂性的扩展能力的运营商... 多位评审提到,ThinkReservations 在多家酒店中运行良好,能够支持从单一客栈到其他微型度假村或其他地点的扩展。这使其对需要无需增加复杂性的扩展能力的运营商具有吸引力。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
评论者欣赏ThinkReservations不断改进,并经常采纳用户建议,显示出产品与运营商需求同步发展。一些用户也希望有更清晰的应用内通知或新闻通讯,以便更方便地了... 评论者欣赏ThinkReservations不断改进,并经常采纳用户建议,显示出产品与运营商需求同步发展。一些用户也希望有更清晰的应用内通知或新闻通讯,以便更方便地了解新功能并加以利用。
用户喜欢日历,因为它能提供所需的信息,并且可以根据酒店的工作流程进行自定义。然而,一位评论者希望在预订引擎中更突出显示空房日历,建议日历的可见性直接影... 用户喜欢日历,因为它能提供所需的信息,并且可以根据酒店的工作流程进行自定义。然而,一位评论者希望在预订引擎中更突出显示空房日历,建议日历的可见性直接影响客人转化率和预订便利性。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 75,ThinkReservations 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐