项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 83 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 在客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.5/5),并拥有在前提以及移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)等独家功能。
Noovy 在易用性以及性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合市中心住宿设施(5.0/5)。
基于 HTR 上 83 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 25 |
在分析了 83 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #41 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 34 条评价 | #36 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 4 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #26 26 条评价 | #39 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 31 条评价 | #56 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #39 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 2 条评价 |
Maestro PMS and Noovy PMS serve distinct hotel segments with some overlap but diverging priorities. Maestro, with over 45 years in the market, fits well with mid-size to large resorts, multi-property groups, and luxury independent hotels that need deep operational customization and modular expansion, including on-premise deployment. Noovy, founded in 2017, targets independent, boutique, and budget properties prioritizing simplicity, automation, and cost-effectiveness.
Both systems address the core PMS goal of managing reservations, check-in/out, billing, and guest communications. Maestro offers a broad suite of integrated modules and robust reporting for complex operations, while Noovy focuses on user-friendly automation including direct OTA integrations and payment processing. The choice hinges on property scale, complexity, and desire for operational depth versus ease and price.
If you operate a resort or multi-property group with complex service lines like spa, retail, or conference centers, Maestro’s 20+ integrated modules and on-premise options provide tailored workflows and compliance like SOC2 certification. Its 58 reviews, mostly from resorts and luxury hotels, rate it 4.4/5 overall, reflecting maturity and flexibility. Properties needing detailed reporting and guest engagement apps will appreciate Maestro’s customization.
If you run a boutique, city center, or limited-service hotel with 7 to 50 rooms, especially in Europe or North America, Noovy’s streamlined, all-in-one platform suits your needs. With 25 reviews averaging 5/5, users praise its intuitive UI and automation such as payment processing and integrated channel management. Budget properties benefit from Noovy’s lower base price ($600 vs $900 for Maestro) and simplicity, although reporting and housekeeping features are less advanced.
Data for large multi-property groups or branded hotels is insufficient for Noovy, while Maestro’s fewer city center hotel reviews advise caution if your property is small and highly standardized. Recent review volume is low for both, so consider the long-term support and product roadmaps.
Noovy leads ease of use decisively, rated 4.9/5 for ease and 4.7/5 for onboarding versus Maestro’s 4.1/5 and 4.4/5 respectively, both with sufficient review counts. Reviewers emphasize Noovy’s intuitive, visual interface and minimal training time, especially for inexperienced staff. One hotel with predominantly student employees praised how Noovy eliminated manual errors and paper-based processes.
Maestro users note the system’s complexity can lengthen staff training and confuse new employees, particularly given its dated UI and multi-module depth. However, they also highlight that support staff assist quickly during onboarding. Noovy’s onboarding is smoother thanks to integrated channel management and payment automation, reducing operational friction.
Edge: Noovy.
Maestro PMS offers 10 hotel-specific features that Noovy lacks, impacting operational scope. Notable are the Spa & Wellness Module, EPoS integration for F&B outlets, Gift Voucher management, and mobile device notes with voice-to-text for housekeeping or maintenance tasks. Employee messaging and shift planning tools facilitate staff coordination, while automated room assignments optimize front desk workflow. SOC2 compliance supports security requirements for large properties.
Noovy provides all core PMS functions plus channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, and guest communications in one system, but lacks specialized modules like spa or retail POS. Noovy’s automation of payments and direct OTA channel integration simplifies financial workflows but offers fewer operational extensions.
Both share 48 features including reservation management, billing, reporting, and guest messaging. The presence of unique, hotel-specific modules in Maestro means properties with diversified service offerings gain operational control not possible with Noovy.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Noovy holds a slight edge in customer support ratings—4.9/5 compared to Maestro’s 4.8/5—both with over 20 recent reviews. Noovy’s users highlight fast, friendly 24/7 phone and chat support that resolves issues promptly. Maestro’s reviews describe accessible, knowledgeable support staff available around the clock, often called "phenomenal" and "a dream" compared to competitors.
Maestro’s long-standing client relationships reflect a culture of problem ownership and detailed follow-through. Noovy’s newer user base appreciates the personalized, hands-on approach during onboarding and day-to-day troubleshooting, especially for smaller teams.
Edge: Noovy.
Maestro PMS supports 87 verified integrations, more than double Noovy’s 41. Both systems connect to major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and channel managers such as SiteMinder. Shared integrations include Revinate, RateGain, IDeaS, and INTELITY, covering revenue management and guest engagement.
Maestro’s unique partners include Criton (mobile apps), Curacity (guest engagement), Hotel Investor Apps, PhoneSuite (telephony), and Volo (restaurant POS), supporting diversified hotel operations. Noovy’s unique integrations focus on channel management and guest review platforms like Customer Alliance and GuestRevu, plus Mews and Shiji Group, addressing independent hotels’ needs.
Properties with complex F&B, spa, or multi-channel requirements benefit from Maestro’s broader ecosystem. Hotels prioritizing OTA connectivity and guest feedback tools can find Noovy’s integrations sufficient.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Noovy commands a higher overall rating of 5/5 from 25 reviewers versus Maestro’s 4.4/5 from 58. Noovy’s recent reviews maintain this rating, although volume has slowed to zero in the last six months. Maestro lacks recent reviews entirely, so its historical ratings may not reflect current product status.
By segment, Noovy scores 5/5 in city center hotels (17 reviews), airport/conference hotels (10), and boutique hotels (14). Maestro rates 4.4/5 to 4.5/5 in resorts (40 reviews), luxury hotels (31), and boutique hotels (27). Noovy’s higher ratings in budget and limited-service properties contrast with Maestro’s strength in resorts and luxury segments.
Noovy’s 99% likelihood to recommend surpasses Maestro’s 88%, reflecting stronger user satisfaction despite fewer reviews. The limited recent review activity for both warrants careful consideration of ongoing product evolution.
Edge: Noovy.
Maestro PMS has a base price of $900 with no published monthly fees or per-room pricing. Noovy PMS’s base cost is $600, also without monthly flat or per-room fees. Neither system offers a freemium model or trial period. Implementation fees are not charged by either.
The published pricing indicates Noovy is more affordable upfront, aligning with its target market of independent and budget hotels. Maestro’s pricing likely reflects its extensive modular functionality and enterprise capabilities, appealing to larger properties with higher operational demands.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Maestro PMS and Noovy PMS address different operational priorities in the hotel industry. Maestro emphasizes comprehensive, customizable modules for resorts and multi-property groups, with strong integration capabilities and on-premise options. Noovy focuses on streamlined operations, automation, and an all-in-one platform for independent and boutique hotels valuing simplicity and cost control.
Choose Maestro if your property requires specialized modules such as spa, retail, and EPoS, along with advanced employee coordination tools and extensive integrations. Also, if your hotel demands on-premise deployment or strict security compliance, Maestro’s 45+ years of domain expertise and 87 verified integrations provide a solid foundation.
Pick Noovy if you run a smaller hotel or budget property where ease of use, rapid onboarding, and payment automation drive operational efficiency. Noovy’s higher user satisfaction ratings, combined channel management and PMS functionality, and lower base price make it a compelling choice for modern independent hoteliers focused on guest experience and streamlined workflows.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS 提供 87 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 41 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 74,Noovy 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐