项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 95 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 在客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.5/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及移动应用等独家功能。
Shiji Group 在易用性以及性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.9/5),并拥有宾客资料以及平板电脑/自助值机等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 95 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $1,200/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 37 |
在分析了 95 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 项目沟通与跟进, 支持的可用性和响应速度, 部署过程中问题极少。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
项目沟通与跟进
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
支持的可用性和响应速度
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
部署过程中问题极少
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
员工的专业性和乐于助人
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #59 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 34 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | #11 16 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 4 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #26 26 条评价 | #32 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 31 条评价 | #26 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #23 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #39 2 条评价 | #36 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #31 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #15 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
Maestro PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS both serve as comprehensive property management systems designed to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in their fit for hotel types and operational scale. Maestro PMS leans toward independent hotels, luxury resorts, and multi-property groups, with a strong emphasis on customization and on-premise options. Shiji Daylight PMS targets a broader market, including global hotel chains, boutique hotels, and branded properties, emphasizing cloud-native architecture and operational scalability.
Both systems solve the core problem of centralizing reservation, guest profile, billing, and housekeeping management. Maestro supports both cloud and on-premise deployments with 20+ integrated modules, while Shiji focuses on a modern cloud-native platform with a Single Guest Profile to unify guest data across properties. The key difference lies in Maestro’s flexibility for complex, unique property needs versus Shiji’s scalable, standardized approach for multi-property consistency.
If your property is a resort or an independent boutique hotel prioritizing deep customization and the option for on-premise deployment, Maestro PMS is the better choice. This recommendation is based on Maestro’s user base where 44% of users are resorts and 21% boutique hotels, with a 4.4/5 rating across 40 resort reviews and 26 boutique hotel reviews. Maestro’s 8 unique features, including a spa and wellness module and voice-to-text mobile device notes, cater well to properties with specialized service offerings.
If you operate a luxury branded hotel, a large hotel group, or a property that requires multi-lingual support and centralized role management across multiple locations, Shiji Daylight PMS fits better. Shiji’s user base shows 41% luxury hotels and 16% branded hotels, with a 4.5/5 rating from 25 luxury hotel reviews and 21 branded hotel reviews. Its 48 unique features such as multi-currency support, automated night audit, and integrated ID scanning support standardized, high-volume operations. Shiji’s broader global presence (17 countries vs Maestro’s 4) also favors international or multi-region portfolios.
For small properties and vacation rentals, the data is thin, so caution is advised. Neither product has substantial recent review volume in these segments, limiting definitive recommendations.
Shiji Daylight PMS has a clear edge in ease of use with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating and 4.5/5 onboarding, compared to Maestro’s 4.1/5 ease of use and 4.4/5 onboarding across 58 and 37 reviews respectively. Reviewers praise Shiji’s intuitive interface, accessible training materials, and smooth tablet and kiosk check-in workflows, reducing the learning curve for front desk staff.
Maestro is described as user-friendly but has a slightly dated user interface and some complexity in reporting and group block imports, which can increase training time for new employees. Its flexibility comes with a steeper initial learning curve. However, Maestro’s support staff receives high marks for helping with onboarding challenges.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a broader feature set with 48 unique features not found in Maestro, including multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated payment terminals, automated night audit, and centralized messaging. These features allow hotels to automate operational tasks like housekeeping assignments, guest communications, and tax configurations, improving front desk efficiency and guest experience. For example, Shiji’s automated space optimization and rules-based room assignments streamline room allocation, saving staff time during peak check-in periods.
Maestro PMS offers 8 unique features that target niche operational strengths: a dedicated Spa & Wellness Module, a revenue management module, on-premise deployment options, and mobile device notes with voice-to-text functionality. These features support properties with complex service offerings like spas or conference centers, enabling tailored guest experiences and internal communication improvements.
Given Shiji’s 48 unique features versus Maestro’s 8, and their operational impacts, Shiji Daylight PMS holds the edge in feature breadth and operational automation.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Maestro PMS scores 4.8/5 on customer support, slightly higher than Shiji’s 4.6/5, but onboarding ratings are closer (4.4/5 vs 4.5/5). Reviewers of Maestro frequently mention a “phenomenal responsive support team” that provides 24/7 assistance and personalized problem-solving, especially valuable for complex multi-use properties. Shiji users describe the support as “always available 24/7” and “professional and helpful,” but some mention slower response times during peak periods.
Support quality is similar, with both vendors providing round-the-clock service and knowledgeable teams. The difference is within the 0.3 threshold applied for rating edges.
Edge: Even.
Maestro PMS has 87 verified integrations, 21 more than Shiji Daylight PMS’s 72. Both share 22 common partners such as SiteMinder, Revinate, and IDeaS, essential for channel management, reputation management, and revenue optimization. Maestro’s unique partners include Criton, Curacity, and Zaplox, which support mobile key access and guest engagement in specialized markets. Shiji’s unique integrations include Oaky by Plusgrade, Mews, and Adyen, which enhance upselling, cloud POS integration, and payment processing.
If your hotel requires integrations for advanced mobile guest experiences or specialized investor apps, Maestro’s broader partner network is advantageous. Shiji’s integrations excel in payment and upsell ecosystems suited for global chains and multi-property groups.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Overall ratings are close: Maestro has 4.4/5 from 58 reviews; Shiji 4.6/5 from 37 reviews. Recent review volume favors Shiji with 3 in the last six months versus zero for Maestro, though sample sizes are small. Recent ratings are consistent with overall scores for both.
By segment, Shiji is rated higher by luxury hotels (4.5/5 from 25 reviews) and branded hotels (4.5/5 from 21), reflecting its strength in large, multi-property operations. Maestro scores 4.5/5 from 31 luxury hotel reviews but has fewer luxury hotel users overall. Resorts prefer Maestro with 4.4/5 from 40 reviews, reflecting the product’s fit for resort operations.
Boutique hotels rate both highly: Maestro 4.4/5 (26 reviews), Shiji 4.6/5 (19 reviews). Bed & Breakfasts give Maestro 4.4/5 (25 reviews) and Shiji 4.9/5 (6 reviews), though Shiji’s B&B review count is limited.
Edge: Even.
Maestro PMS has a base price of $900 with no published implementation fees or per-room pricing. Shiji Daylight PMS starts higher at $1,200 base price, also with no implementation fees or per-room pricing published. Neither product offers trial versions.
Without per-room or monthly fees disclosed, the comparison is limited to base price only. Maestro’s lower base price may appeal to smaller properties or those seeking on-premise deployments, while Shiji’s higher price reflects its cloud-native platform and broader feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between Maestro PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS lies in deployment flexibility and feature breadth. Maestro supports both cloud and on-premise with a focus on customization and specialized modules for resorts and spas, while Shiji is a cloud-native platform designed for scalability, operational consistency, and automation across large hotel groups.
Choose Maestro PMS if your property is a resort or independent hotel requiring flexible deployment, integrated spa and wellness management, and a broad partner ecosystem to support unique operational workflows. Maestro’s 24/7 customer support and customizable reporting further benefit properties with complex needs.
Choose Shiji Daylight PMS if your hotel is part of a branded group or luxury chain valuing a cloud-first platform with advanced automation, multi-currency and multilingual capabilities, and comprehensive guest profile management. Shiji’s feature set supports online check-in/out, automated night audit, and centralized housekeeping, which reduce operational overhead and improve guest experience at scale.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $1,200/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
客户强调,世纪团队沟通清晰,始终让相关方了解进展。这种跟进程度帮助酒店避免实施过程中的混乱,支持更顺利的过渡。
评论指出,世纪支持在需要时随时可用,且客服代表乐于助人且响应迅速。这在设置和初期使用阶段,尤其是遇到时间敏感问题时,给酒店带来了信心。
反馈表明安装本身几乎没有问题,任何小故障都归因于酒店内部管理混乱,而非Shiji。对于正在评估该系统的酒店来说,这意味着实施风险较低,部署更可预测。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS 提供 87 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 72 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 74,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐