The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 104 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mister Booking 表现出色 .
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 104 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 104 |
在分析了 104 条经验证的评价后,Mister Booking 用户最看重其 ,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Mister Booking and myCloud Hospitality PMS both aim to streamline hotel management but serve different segments and needs. Mister Booking is a lesser-known system with limited reviews and features, while myCloud Hospitality PMS has a robust global presence, extensive features, and a strong user base. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a well-supported, feature-rich platform or are exploring a less established option.
Both products aim to improve reservation handling, guest management, and reporting. Mister Booking’s limited visibility and lack of recent user feedback make it difficult to assess its current performance. In contrast, myCloud boasts over 95 recent reviews, a high NPS score, and substantial client satisfaction, making it the more reliable and proven option. Do you want a system backed by active users and continuous updates, or are you willing to consider a lesser-known option?
Mister Booking’s offering appears underwhelming, with no recent reviews, a zero-star rating, and no measurable customer support or ease-of-use data. It claims to be a comprehensive property management system but lacks verifiable recent user feedback or clear feature documentation. Its absence from international markets and no verified integrations or partners raise questions about its scalability and support.
Conversely, myCloud Hospitality PMS has a 4.81/5 overall rating based on 95 recent reviews, with a 4.83/5 support score and a 9.03/5 NPS score, indicating high customer satisfaction. Users praise its ease of use, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations, including channel managers, CRMs, and payment systems. It’s actively used across multiple regions, with proven support for different hotel types. Are you comfortable adopting a system with little recent feedback, or do you want a platform with a proven track record and active user community?
If your hotel prioritizes comprehensive features, proven support, and global presence, myCloud Hospitality PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (59 unique features) includes multi-currency, multi-lingual support, integrations with major OTAs, advanced revenue management, and contactless check-in capabilities—features Mister Booking simply does not offer.
If, however, your hotel prefers a lightweight or niche system with potentially simpler implementation—though unverified—Mister Booking might seem appealing. Still, its lack of recent reviews, documented features, and customer support makes it a risky option. For most hotels, especially those seeking reliable, scalable solutions, myCloud’s established reputation and rich feature set outweigh the uncertainties of Mister Booking.
Based on available reviews, myCloud Hospitality PMS scores highly on usability, with a 4.79/5 ease-of-use rating, and users constantly praise its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Hoteliers highlight how easy it is for staff to learn and operate, with some even calling it “user friendly” and “very well integrated,” which reduces training time and operational disruptions.
Mister Booking’s ease-of-use rating is zero, and no recent user feedback is available to gauge its interface or onboarding process. Without concrete data or user reviews, it’s impossible to confirm whether it is simple to adopt or operate. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS boasts an impressive 59 features, including a booking engine, channel management, revenue tracking, online check-in, mobile keys, and integrated CRM—many of which Mister Booking does not claim to offer. Its features support automation, contactless check-in, guest communications, and advanced reporting, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for hotel operations.
Mister Booking, on the other hand, offers no specific features or modules in the available data, making it impossible to compare directly. Given its limited information, it’s safe to conclude that myCloud’s feature-rich platform is better suited for hotels seeking a full-stack PMS. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS receives a 4.83/5 support rating, with reviewers frequently noting quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Hoteliers describe the support team as “always willing to help” and “responsive,” which reduces downtime and operational stress.
Mister Booking’s support quality cannot be assessed due to lack of recent reviews or ratings. Its absence from recent user feedback suggests limited or unverified support services, leaving your team potentially vulnerable during critical moments. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS has verified integrations with 29 partners, including prominent OTAs, payment processors, CRMs, and analytics tools like Sage, Lybra Tech, and SiteMinder. Its open API allows easy connection with third-party systems, making it adaptable to various hotel setups.
Mister Booking reports no verified integrations or partners, which limits its flexibility and scalability. Without integrations, your hotel might face manual processes and data silos, hindering operational efficiency. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
With over 95 recent reviews and a 4.81/5 overall rating, myCloud Hospitality PMS is clearly favored among hoteliers. Its clients, spanning boutique, resort, and branded hotels, frequently mention its ease of use, detailed reports, and support as key strengths.
Mister Booking, with no recent reviews or verified ratings, cannot be reliably rated. The lack of feedback casts doubt on its current performance or user satisfaction level. Given the data, hoteliers rate myCloud significantly higher. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Mister Booking’s pricing is not publicly available, and it does not offer a trial or transparent cost structure. This opacity makes it difficult to evaluate its value proposition or compare it against competitors.
myCloud Hospitality PMS charges $900 monthly, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its pricing aligns with its enterprise-level feature set, but the transparent cost allows hotels to plan budgets more effectively. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
The core difference between these two systems is scale and support. myCloud Hospitality PMS offers a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, proven support, and a strong user base. Mister Booking remains obscure, with no recent data or verified features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability.
If your hotel needs a dependable, scalable PMS with recent active reviews, go with myCloud Hospitality PMS. It provides the features, support, and regional presence necessary for modern hotel management. Unless you are experimenting with a very limited setup and can accept risk, myCloud is the sensible choice.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive system capable of supporting growth, automation, and guest satisfaction, myCloud Hospitality PMS aligns perfectly with those goals. Mister Booking’s lack of verifiable data makes it unsuitable for those seeking certainty and proven performance in today's competitive hospitality landscape.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Mister Booking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mister Booking 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mister Booking 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mister Booking 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。myCloud Hospitality PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mister Booking:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mister Booking 的 HT Score 为 0,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问