The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #10 79 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Moder by Moder and protel PMS by Planet aim to streamline operations, but they do so with different strengths. Moder offers a simplified, cloud-native platform with a focus on ease of use and all-in-one management, while protel provides a highly customizable, feature-rich system with extensive integrations. Which one best serves your specific needs?
Moder is a newer, cloud-based PMS with a focus on ease of use and rapid onboarding, boasting a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating from recent reviews. Conversely, protel has a 4.12/5 score for ease of use but offers a broader feature set, including numerous modules and integrations, although it can be more complex to navigate.
Customer support ratings favor Moder at 5/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, especially during onboarding and after. protel's support, rated at 3.95/5, receives mixed reviews; some mention slow responses and bugs that hinder daily operations.
Recent reviews favor Moder, with only 3 reviews in the last 6 months, all highly positive, compared to protel's single recent review. This indicates Moder's ongoing updates and customer satisfaction are currently stronger.
In summary, Moder solves straightforward management and quick deployment needs, whereas protel offers a more comprehensive suite for complex, multi-property operations. Which challenges are your hotel facing?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, all-in-one PMS that requires minimal training and quick implementation, Moder is the clear choice. It excels for small to midsize hotels prioritizing speed, simplicity, and solid support, especially with a recent emphasis on positive reviews and high satisfaction.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, scalable platform with extensive integrations, protel is better suited. It's ideal for larger, complex properties or chains that need detailed reporting, automation, and the ability to tailor workflows and features extensively.
For independent hotels or properties that want a straightforward, reliable system with excellent onboarding, Moder is the recommended pick. For multi-property groups seeking deep configurability and integration, protel offers a more robust, flexible solution.
Moder scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Staff find it quick to learn and adopt, with many citing their ability to start managing operations within days.
In contrast, protel's 4.12/5 rating reflects a user-friendly experience but with a steeper learning curve due to its large feature set and customization options. Some users report that navigating the system can be complex, especially for new staff or in multi-property environments.
Recent reviews favor Moder for its simplicity, especially for smaller teams or hotels new to PMS technology. Edge: Moder.
Protel boasts over 46 unique features, including revenue management modules, multi-currency support, integrated booking engine, guest CRM, online support, and detailed reporting tools. These features cater to hotels aiming for a highly automated, data-driven approach.
Moder, with no exclusive features listed, focuses on core property management functions, sales, and package building. While it covers essential operations effectively, it lacks the breadth of specialized modules that protel offers.
If your hotel needs advanced revenue management, multi-lingual support, or extensive integrations, protel’s richer feature set gives it an edge. For simpler operations that prioritize ease and speed, Moder's streamlined approach suffices. Edge: protel.
Moder’s support is rated 5/5, with recent reviews emphasizing exceptional onboarding and ongoing assistance. Customers describe Moder’s team as highly engaged, making the transition smooth and providing ongoing help.
Protel’s support, rated at 3.95/5, has mixed feedback. While some praise its long-standing reputation, others criticize slow response times and unresolved bugs that impact daily operations. Several users mention delays in support, especially after Planet’s acquisition.
Given the recent review activity and ratings, Moder’s support is currently more reliable. Edge: Moder.
Protel shines with 195 verified integrations, including key hospitality systems like RMS, CRM, revenue management, and channel managers. Its ecosystem is extensive, allowing hotels to connect a wide range of third-party tools easily.
Moder, with no verified integrations listed, appears to have limited or no officially supported third-party connections. This could restrict scalability or customization for hotels that rely on specific external systems.
For hotels needing a broad, flexible integration environment, protel’s ecosystem is a clear advantage. Edge: protel.
Moder’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess user satisfaction confidently. All recent reviews for protel, however, rate it at 4.11/5, with many praising its reliability, detailed reporting, and customization options.
Hotel segments like independent and boutique hotels rate protel higher, with reviews indicating satisfaction with its scalability and features. Larger chains or hotels needing extensive integrations value protel’s flexibility.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, protel’s user rating is more trustworthy. Edge: protel.
Moder’s pricing details are not publicly available, which suggests it may have custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its absence of transparent pricing indicates it may be targeted at hotels willing to invest in tailored solutions.
Protel’s subscription starts at $500 per month, with no mention of setup fees or tiered pricing. Its cost is in line with other enterprise PMS options, especially considering its extensive features.
If budget transparency is crucial, protel’s straightforward pricing may be advantageous. Otherwise, Moder likely involves a customized quote.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Protel offers a broad, flexible PMS designed for extensive customization, integrations, and scalability. Its strengths lie in its feature set, ecosystem, and adaptability, making it ideal for larger or more complex hotel operations.
Moder provides a simplified, mobile-friendly PMS that excels in ease of use, onboarding, and support. It’s best suited for small to midsize hotels seeking an intuitive platform to get started quickly and maintain smooth daily operations.
Choose Moder if your property values simplicity, rapid deployment, and excellent support. Opt for protel if your hotel requires advanced features, deep integrations, and future growth potential.
In summary, if you prioritize a straightforward, well-supported system, Moder is the safer choice. But if your hotel needs comprehensive, customizable management tools, protel stands out.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Moder 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Moder 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Moder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Moder:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Moder 的 HT Score 为 0,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问