The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 212 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Moder 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 用户界面和体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 212 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 209 |
在分析了 212 条经验证的评价后,Moder 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Moder by Moder and RoomRaccoon PMS hinges on your hotel's size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline management, but Moder’s focus is on providing a simple, cloud-based central hub for all hotel operations, while RoomRaccoon offers an extensive, feature-rich system tailored for independent hotels seeking automation and integration. Which platform aligns better with your current needs and future goals?
Moder positions itself as an easy-to-use solution with a focus on core operational efficiency. RoomRaccoon, with its broader feature set and recent growth in reviews, clearly targets hotels looking for automation, revenue management, and flexible integrations. Are you prioritizing simplicity or a comprehensive toolkit?
Moder and RoomRaccoon address the core needs of hotel management—reservation handling, guest communication, and operational control—but they diverge in scope and depth. Moder’s strength lies in its straightforward, cloud-native approach, which streamlines daily workflows and offers real-time visibility across departments. In contrast, RoomRaccoon boasts a richer set of features, including a channel manager, booking engine, and revenue tools, aimed at automating revenue growth and guest engagement.
RoomRaccoon’s user base is significantly larger, with 169 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.88/5, reflecting broad adoption and trust. Moder’s limited review count (3 reviews) and rating of 0/5 suggest a nascent product with limited user feedback, making its effectiveness harder to validate at this stage.
Given the recent surge in reviews and high scores, RoomRaccoon’s platform demonstrates a proven track record in diverse hotel environments. Moder’s approach might appeal to properties seeking a minimal setup, but its limited feedback indicates it may not yet match RoomRaccoon’s maturity. Do you need a proven platform with extensive features and recent validation?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one system that integrates booking, channel management, invoicing, and automation, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. It’s designed for independent hotels and small properties that want to increase direct bookings, streamline operations, and maximize revenue through dynamic pricing and automated guest communications.
On the other hand, if your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and a centralized system primarily for reservations and guest profiles without extensive automation or integrations, Moder might seem appealing. However, its limited reviews and lack of recent feedback make it hard to recommend confidently. For a scalable, revenue-focused solution, RoomRaccoon’s richer feature set makes it the better fit.
In summary, choose RoomRaccoon if you want a proven, scalable platform with a broad feature set. Opt for Moder if you prefer a straightforward, minimal system, understanding it currently has less validation and fewer features.
RoomRaccoon enjoys a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and straightforward daily operations. Multiple reviews mention that staff learn it quickly, reducing training time and minimizing errors, which is critical for small teams.
Moder, with a perfect 5/5 rating, also claims ease of use, but this is based on only three reviews, all highly positive. Yet, the limited feedback makes it difficult to assess the platform’s true user-friendliness at scale. Given RoomRaccoon’s extensive recent reviews and high ratings, it clearly offers a more reliable, user-friendly experience today.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon offers 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile app, automated night audit, and more—features that are absent in Moder. These functionalities enable small hotels to automate pricing, manage reservations across channels, and enhance guest engagement.
Moder’s feature set is limited, focusing on core reservation and operations management without the extensive automation or integrations found in RoomRaccoon. While Moder may cover basic needs, RoomRaccoon’s broader capabilities provide a significant advantage for hotels seeking growth and automation.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
Both products boast high support ratings—Moder with a 5/5 and RoomRaccoon with 4.53/5. Reviews for Moder praise its exceptional onboarding support, while RoomRaccoon’s users highlight responsive, helpful customer service that quickly resolves issues.
However, Moder’s small review base makes it hard to gauge support consistency across multiple users. RoomRaccoon’s larger, more recent review pool indicates a support team that actively addresses customer needs, especially critical during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Edge: Moder
RoomRaccoon connects to 88 verified partners, including a wide array of payment platforms, CRS, revenue management, and marketing tools—vital for hotels that want a flexible, integrated tech stack. Its extensive partner network enables seamless data flow, automation, and operational efficiency.
Moder, with no verified integrations listed, limits your ability to connect with third-party systems, potentially requiring manual workarounds. For scalable growth and flexibility, RoomRaccoon clearly outperforms Moder in integrations.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews consistently rate it near 5/5, with a 4.88/5 overall score based on 169 reviews in the last 6 months. Users from diverse property types—boutiques, independent hotels, guesthouses—highlight its ease, automation, and revenue benefits.
Moder’s reviews are limited to three, all with perfect scores, but their age and volume lack the robustness needed for a conclusive comparison. Given the volume and recency, RoomRaccoon’s ratings are a more reliable indicator of user satisfaction.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
Moder’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting a bespoke quote or limited transparency. RoomRaccoon charges a flat base fee of $1,000 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees, making costs predictable for small hotels and independents.
Without clear pricing for Moder, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, considering RoomRaccoon’s transparent pricing and extensive feature set, it generally offers a solid ROI for small and growing hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel aims to grow rapidly or needs extensive integrations, automation, or revenue optimization features. Larger or more complex properties may find Moder’s capabilities limited.
Not ideal if your hotel is large, multi-property, or requires advanced features like corporate account management or extensive enterprise integrations. Larger properties may find RoomRaccoon’s capabilities insufficient for their needs.
RoomRaccoon stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS tailored for independent and small hotels that want to automate and grow. Its extensive recent reviews, higher ratings, and broad partner integrations demonstrate its maturity and reliability.
Moder offers a simple, cloud-based solution that might suit properties with minimal management needs and a focus on ease of use. However, the limited validation and feature set make it less compelling for hotels aiming to scale or automate revenue.
For most hotels focused on automation, revenue growth, and operational efficiency, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. If your needs are basic and you prefer a minimal setup, Moder could work but with less proven reliability and fewer features.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Moder 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Moder 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Moder 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Moder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Moder:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Moder 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问