The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Newway |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Newway |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Newway |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #10 79 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue management. With Newway by Newway and protel PMS by Planet, you're comparing two distinct solutions that aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different needs and markets. How do they stack up, and which one aligns better with your hotel’s future?
Both Newway and protel PMS aim to centralize hotel management tasks, but their approaches diverge significantly. Newway, with no recent reviews or ratings, appears to lack a demonstrated market presence or user feedback, making its reliability and features uncertain. Conversely, protel PMS boasts over 100 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.11 out of 5, reflecting solid user satisfaction and ongoing support.
While Newway's lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess its current performance, protel’s recent reviews indicate it is well-regarded for its extensive functionality, especially in larger or more complex hotels. Are you willing to trust an unreviewed product, or do recent user experiences influence your decision?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, possibly niche solution with minimal complexity, Newway might seem appealing, but the absence of recent reviews and a low or nonexistent user base make this a risky choice. For hotels seeking a trusted platform with proven functionality, extensive integrations, and a broad customer base, protel PMS is the clear winner.
Hotels that prioritize robust integration, scalability, and proven support should go with protel. If your hotel is small or requires only basic management features, Newway's market silence suggests it may not meet your needs—especially given the lack of recent validation.
With no user reviews or ratings available for Newway, assessing its usability is impossible; its interface, onboarding process, and staff adoption are unverified. On the other hand, protel PMS enjoys a 4.12/5 ease of use rating based on over 100 recent reviews, with many users describing it as intuitive and efficient.
Protel’s interface is praised for its clarity, responsiveness, and ease of navigation, which facilitates staff onboarding and daily operations. Edge: protel PMS.
Newway offers no detailed feature information or verified features, leaving its capabilities uncertain. protel PMS, however, boasts 46 distinct features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, online support, and more.
Protel’s extensive feature set caters to both small and large hotels, with modules that support automation, guest communication, and detailed reporting. It also offers flexible customization options. Edge: protel PMS.
There are no recent reviews, ratings, or feedback on Newway’s support services, making it impossible to judge support quality or responsiveness. In contrast, protel PMS has a customer support rating of 3.95/5 from over 100 reviews, with users praising its 24/7 multilingual support and professional assistance.
While some reviews mention support response times could be improved, overall, users report that protel provides reliable help when needed. Edge: protel PMS.
Newway, with zero verified integrations, appears to have very limited or no integration ecosystem. In contrast, protel PMS supports over 1,200 integrations, including popular systems like RMS, CRM, channel managers, and payment providers.
This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to connect seamlessly with other critical systems, enhancing operational efficiency and guest experience. If integration breadth matters to you, protel is the clear choice. Edge: protel PMS.
Given that Newway has no recent reviews or ratings, it cannot be rated by users. Protel PMS, with a recent overall rating of 4.11 and a high likelihood to recommend (80%), is favored by hoteliers, especially those managing independent, boutique, and resort properties.
Hotels across various segments—particularly independents and small chains—appreciate protel’s versatility and robust support. Due to the absence of data, Newway's rating is unconfirmed, but the current user feedback heavily favors protel. Edge: protel PMS.
Newway’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting either a bespoke quote or limited market adoption. Conversely, protel PMS costs $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial, making it a transparent, predictable investment.
Consider your budget and the value you expect from features and support. With clear pricing for protel, your cost planning is easier; the absence of data about Newway’s pricing indicates caution.
Given the lack of recent reviews and features, Newway may not support the complex demands of larger or multi-property hotels. It could suit very small or specialized properties with minimal operational complexity.
Protel’s modular, scalable system is suitable across segments, especially for hotels that value flexibility, detailed control, and extensive ecosystem support.
Newway presents an uncertain option with no recent reviews or verified features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven performance. Its lack of market presence means you are venturing into largely untested territory, especially crucial for complex or multi-property operations.
Protel PMS, supported by over 100 recent reviews, is a trusted, feature-rich platform with broad integrations and solid support. It is a reliable choice for hotels that want a solution capable of growing with them, backed by proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel values dependability, extensive functionality, and a large ecosystem, protel PMS is the clear winner. Conversely, if you seek a simple, low-cost option and are willing to accept the risks of limited feedback, Newway might be worth exploring—but with caution.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Newway 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Newway 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。protel PMS (by Planet) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Newway:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Newway 的 HT Score 为 0,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问