项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 705 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Duve 表现出色 在 易用性与运营效率 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Friendly and SMS text messaging.
Orana Software 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 705 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 703 | 2 |
在分析了 705 条经验证的评价后,Duve 用户最看重其 易用性与运营效率, 客人沟通与消息, 向上销售和附加收入生成,而 Orana Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性与运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
客人沟通与消息
▾
|
|
|
+
向上销售和附加收入生成
▾
|
|
|
+
客人应用内容与酒店营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化与工作流程的灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
登录、可用性和技术障碍
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS 和第三方集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 139 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 229 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 195 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #1 66 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 256 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 305 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 94 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 262 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 29 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 258 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Duve App by Duve and Orana Stay by Orana Software hinges on understanding their core offerings and how they match your hotel’s needs. Duve is a comprehensive guest management platform with extensive features and a large global footprint, while Orana Stay offers a branded app focusing on automation and convenience with a smaller but loyal user base. Both aim to enhance guest experiences, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly.
If your hotel seeks an all-in-one platform that consolidates communication, upselling, and operational automation, Duve’s broader scope and richer feature set make it the more compelling option. Conversely, if your priority is a simple, branded guest app primarily for automating FAQs and direct communication, Orana Stay can be sufficient and budget-friendly.
Are you ready to integrate a scalable, feature-rich platform or prefer a straightforward, branded digital concierge? Let’s explore the details.
Both products aim to streamline guest interactions, but they do so with different strengths. Duve provides a robust, enterprise-level solution—offering digital check-in, room access, upselling, and multi-language messaging—making it ideal for hotels seeking deep automation and integration. Orana Stay, on the other hand, emphasizes a branded app for direct guest communication and booking, which suits properties prioritizing guest engagement without complex integrations.
Duve boasts a high overall score of 4.75/5 from nearly 500 reviews and a recent uptick in positive feedback, indicating strong market confidence. Orana Stay, with only 2 reviews, lacks recent and broad user feedback, which makes its reliability and feature depth less certain. Are you comfortable with a proven leader or open to a newer, less tested solution?
If your hotel needs a versatile platform capable of handling digital check-in, contactless room access, guest upselling, and multi-language messaging, Duve is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (15 unique features) and proven track record across large hotel chains make it ideal for mid-sized and large properties aiming for operational efficiency and revenue growth.
If your hotel’s focus is on a branded guest app that simplifies communication, answers FAQs, and encourages direct bookings on a small scale, Orana Stay may suffice. Its lower price point ($400 versus Duve’s $900) and straightforward features suit boutique hotels or small properties looking to enhance guest self-service without extensive integration needs.
In essence, choose Duve if you value comprehensive functionality and scalability; select Orana if you prioritize simplicity and cost-efficiency.
Duve’s user interface has a high rating of 4.73/5, praised for its intuitiveness but noted to have a steep learning curve in initial setup due to its complexity. Onboarding is rated 4.67/5, with some recent reviews highlighting a need for better user training and support, especially during the early deployment phase.
Orana Stay scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing straightforward setup, simple navigation, and quick implementation—ideal for small teams or properties without dedicated tech support. However, its limited feature set means less complexity overall.
Edge: Orana Stay.
Duve offers a total of 15 features, including mobile-friendly guest communication, WhatsApp integration, automated replies, secured data protection, SMS messaging, analytics dashboards, open API, mobile app, mobile check-in/out, room service ordering, and more. These enable a highly automated, multi-channel guest experience.
Orana Stay provides 8 core features like direct messaging, maps & directions, weather info, and booking options, all within a branded app. It lacks advanced automation, integrations, or operational tools.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s support scores 4.65/5, with reviews citing responsive, helpful assistance for onboarding and troubleshooting. However, some recent feedback mentions delays and occasional dissatisfaction with support responsiveness, especially during complex integrations.
Orana Stay is rated 5/5 for support, with reviews highlighting prompt communication, easy collaboration, and proactive suggestions. Its smaller team size and regional focus may contribute to faster, more personalized service.
Edge: Orana Stay.
Duve boasts 65 verified partners, including major PMS and booking platforms like RoomRaccoon, Sirvoy, Guesty, RMS, Cloudbeds, and API access for custom integrations. This extensive ecosystem supports larger hotels and chains aiming for unified systems.
Orana Stay integrates with only 6 partners, such as Booking.com and Google Maps, primarily focusing on core guest communication and booking features. It’s more limited in connecting with hotel management systems.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s reviews, with 496 recent evaluations, give it a 4.75/5, with hoteliers praising its versatility, automation, and revenue impact. Small complaints include setup complexity and occasional bugs, but overall satisfaction is high.
Orana Stay, with only 2 reviews from a year ago, has no recent ratings but is described as easy and effective for small-scale use. The limited data makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction confidently.
Edge: Duve.
Duve charges a base price of $900 with no freemium or per-room fees, offering advanced features suited to larger properties or chains. Its pricing reflects its enterprise capabilities and extensive feature set.
Orana Stay costs $400 upfront, with no mention of ongoing fees or freemium options. It’s more affordable but offers fewer integrations and automation features.
Duve offers a full-stack guest experience platform with extensive features, integrations, and proven results across large hotel chains. It is a fit for hotels seeking operational automation, revenue growth, and seamless guest engagement, despite a longer setup process.
Orana Stay provides a single, branded app focusing on automation, FAQs, and direct communication, best suited for small hotels or boutique properties that want a cost-effective, easy-to-deploy guest app. Its limited feature set and fewer integrations make it less ideal for larger or more complex operations.
Choose Duve if your hotel needs a scalable, comprehensive solution that drives revenue and operational efficiency. Opt for Orana Stay if you want a simple, branded guest app to improve guest communication and encourage direct bookings without the complexity or cost associated with larger platforms.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Duve was a game changer for our customer service. I knew the platform would help us connect with guests but I was amazed at how cleverly simple it all is, even guests who are not v..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"While scaling up and growing in terms of more hotel rooms and more hotels in different countries we found it difficult to communicate with our guests in a very personal way. Duve f..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论者表示,Duve 通过减少重复任务、集中信息、提升运营效率,简化了酒店的日常工作。这对于繁忙的团队和高客流量的酒店尤为重要,它们需要一种更快、更有... 许多评论者表示,Duve 通过减少重复任务、集中信息、提升运营效率,简化了酒店的日常工作。这对于繁忙的团队和高客流量的酒店尤为重要,它们需要一种更快、更有序的方式来管理客人互动和到店流程。
用户最常表扬Duve将客人沟通集中在聊天、WhatsApp、短信和电子邮件中,方便员工更快响应并将所有内容集中管理。评论者表示,这改善了响应速度,减少了遗漏请求,... 用户最常表扬Duve将客人沟通集中在聊天、WhatsApp、短信和电子邮件中,方便员工更快响应并将所有内容集中管理。评论者表示,这改善了响应速度,减少了遗漏请求,并使在入住前、入住中和离店后管理对话变得更容易。
酒店经常提到Duve作为一种增加收入的工具,用于销售升级、延迟退房、套餐、餐饮、水疗、活动和其他额外服务。用户表示它帮助他们在宾客旅程的关键时刻推送优惠,... 酒店经常提到Duve作为一种增加收入的工具,用于销售升级、延迟退房、套餐、餐饮、水疗、活动和其他额外服务。用户表示它帮助他们在宾客旅程的关键时刻推送优惠,并跟踪向上销售的表现,尽管一些用户希望获得更好的向上销售收入和转化率分析。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户始终希望对工作流程、消息触发器、模板、客人应用设计以及酒店特定设置拥有更多控制权。Duve 被认为具有灵活性,但酒店表示更深入的定制化能更好地适应不同... 用户始终希望对工作流程、消息触发器、模板、客人应用设计以及酒店特定设置拥有更多控制权。Duve 被认为具有灵活性,但酒店表示更深入的定制化能更好地适应不同的预订类型、品牌和多酒店运营,而无需增加手动工作量。
一些评价指出登录、导航时存在障碍,以及偶尔出现的平台错误或消息传递问题。最常见的抱怨包括两步验证的邮箱登录、令人困惑的导航、消息无法可靠发送或刷新,以... 一些评价指出登录、导航时存在障碍,以及偶尔出现的平台错误或消息传递问题。最常见的抱怨包括两步验证的邮箱登录、令人困惑的导航、消息无法可靠发送或刷新,以及偶尔出现的界面复杂度影响员工效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Duve App 和 Orana Stay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Duve App 提供 72 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Orana Stay 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Orana Stay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Duve App:否。Orana Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Duve 的 HT Score 为 100,Orana Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐