LIKE MAGIC vs. Orana Stay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 2026年11月14日  ·  已分析 28 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

LIKE MAGIC 在运营效率和节省时间方面表现出色,尤其适合长住住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有移动结帐以及手机值机等独家功能。

Orana Software 凭借自动翻译(多语言)以及当地推荐等独家功能脱颖而出。

查看下方完整分析 ↓

LIKE MAGIC 与 Orana Stay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
74
0
推荐可能性
99%
100%
易用性
5.0/5
5.0/5
客户支持
4.8/5
5.0/5
性价比
4.9/5
5.0/5
起始价格 起价 $700/月 起价 $400/月
经验证的评价 26 2

LIKE MAGIC 与 Orana Stay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 运营效率和节省时间, 预订引擎的性能和易用性, 企业/b2b功能缺失,而 Orana Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
优点
+ 运营效率和节省时间 ▾
+ 预订引擎的性能和易用性 ▾
+ 企业/B2B功能缺失 ▾
+ 一体化宾客旅程平台 ▾
缺点
− 定制和品牌限制 ▾

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Orana Software:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #10 10 条评价 #25 1 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #14 10 条评价 —
大型(75-199 间客房) #17 3 条评价 —

按酒店类型

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
精品酒店 ▾ #18 8 条评价 #32 2 条评价
豪华酒店 #33 2 条评价 —
品牌/连锁酒店 #19 3 条评价 —
长住酒店 ▾ #4 13 条评价 —

按区域

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
北美 #30 1 条评价 —
欧洲 ▾ #10 24 条评价 —

Is LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay Better for Hotels?

LIKE MAGIC and Orana Stay are both digital guest apps designed to improve guest communication and operational efficiency from booking through check-out. They diverge primarily in feature scope and market focus: LIKE MAGIC offers a broader operational platform including mobile check-in and checkout, room service ordering, and integration with multiple PMS systems, fitting mid-sized hotels and serviced apartments in Europe aiming for deep operational automation. Orana Stay centers on guest self-service and local recommendations with a focus on smaller boutique properties, especially in Australia and Asia Pacific, emphasizing guest convenience and direct communication.

Both solve the core problem of streamlining guest interactions to reduce front desk burden and improve guest satisfaction through digital engagement. They replace traditional paper guidebooks and manual guest queries with mobile tools that enhance the guest journey and free staff for higher-value tasks.

LIKE MAGIC vs Orana Stay: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If you run an extended stay or serviced apartment property in Europe with 20 or more rooms, choose LIKE MAGIC. Its 26 verified reviews averaging 5/5 overall demonstrate strong operator satisfaction in this segment, driven by features like mobile check-in, mobile checkout, and room service ordering that automate front desk workflows and boost ancillary revenue. Its 11 integrations with PMS and access control providers support complex operations. For small boutique hotels in Australia or Asia Pacific, Orana Stay’s 5/5 rating from 2 boutique hotel reviews and features like automatic translations and local recommendations make it a better fit for properties seeking a straightforward, guest-facing app to reduce guest inquiries and encourage direct bookings. Orana’s smaller integration set and simpler feature base limit scalability for larger hotels.

Data is limited for Orana Stay outside boutique hotels and Australia, so its fit for larger or non-boutique hotels is unproven. LIKE MAGIC lacks automatic translation and local recommendations, which might matter for globally diverse guests. Overall, LIKE MAGIC suits properties aiming for operational efficiency and upsell automation; Orana Stay suits hotels prioritizing guest convenience and simple digital concierge features.

Is LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay Easier to Use?

Both products receive perfect 5/5 ratings for ease of use and onboarding, supported by reviews praising intuitive interfaces and straightforward implementation. LIKE MAGIC users highlight a mobile-first design that staff quickly adopt, with one citing training reduced to 1.5 days at a 168-room property. Orana Stay reviews emphasize simple guest and staff usability with effective communication during implementation. Neither product’s recent review volume is high enough to detect changes in usability trends. Both maintain high adoption by front desk and guest-facing teams with minimal friction.

Edge: Even.

Which Has Better Features: LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay?

LIKE MAGIC leads with four exclusive features: mobile check-in, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and app download without app store installation. These features automate check-in/out workflows, reduce front desk load, enable direct upselling of food and services, and provide seamless guest access without installation barriers. Orana Stay’s unique features are automatic translations (multi-lingual support) and local recommendations, which improve guest convenience especially for international travelers and help hotels showcase nearby experiences to increase ancillary revenue.

Both share six features including guest messaging and booking capabilities, but LIKE MAGIC’s operational tools (check-in/out automation and room service) enable greater staff efficiency and revenue opportunities. Orana Stay’s localization features enhance guest satisfaction in multilingual or tourist-heavy markets but lack operational automation.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Has Better Customer Support: LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay?

LIKE MAGIC scores 4.8/5 for customer support and 4.8/5 for onboarding from 26 reviews, with praise for responsive, solution-oriented teams and continuous product evolution. Some users request telephone support for urgent cases. Orana Stay scores 5/5 for both support and onboarding but from only 2 reviews, both from boutique hotels praising fast, local communication during implementation and ongoing support. The difference is within the margin given limited Orana data, and both products appear highly regarded for support.

Edge: Even.

Which Has More Integrations: LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay?

LIKE MAGIC offers 11 verified integrations including major PMS platforms like Mews, apaleo GmbH, Oracle Hospitality, and systems for access control (SALTO Systems), payment (Adyen), and guest feedback (TrustYou). These integrations enable automated guest data syncing, access management, and payment processing, critical for mid-sized hotels and serviced apartments with complex workflows.

Orana Stay has 6 verified integrations focusing on PMS platforms such as Cloudbeds, RMS, Guesty, and OwnerRez, covering boutique and smaller properties’ needs but with fewer options for advanced operational automation.

No shared integrations exist, highlighting each product’s distinct ecosystem. Hotels requiring deep PMS and operational integration should favor LIKE MAGIC; those seeking core PMS connections without extra layers may find Orana Stay sufficient.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: LIKE MAGIC or Orana Stay?

Both products have perfect 5/5 overall ratings. LIKE MAGIC’s 26 reviews versus Orana Stay’s 2 means LIKE MAGIC’s rating is more representative. LIKE MAGIC’s recent review volume has ceased (0 in last 6 months vs 6.5 average prior), possibly indicating stable product maturity. Orana Stay has no recent reviews, limiting confidence in current product fit.

Segment ratings show LIKE MAGIC excels in extended stay and serviced apartments (5/5 across 13 reviews), boutique hotels (4.9/5 across 8 reviews), and city center hotels (4.9/5 across 11 reviews). Orana Stay’s data is limited to boutique hotels (5/5 from 2 reviews).

Edge: Even.

How Much Do LIKE MAGIC and Orana Stay Cost?

LIKE MAGIC charges a $700 base price with no implementation fee, no monthly flat or per-room fees, and no trial offered. Orana Stay has a $400 base price with similar terms—no implementation fee, no monthly fees, and no trial.

Both employ a base price model without per-room or recurring monthly charges disclosed, making initial cost comparison straightforward but total cost of ownership dependent on property size and usage. LIKE MAGIC’s higher base price reflects its broader feature set and integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use LIKE MAGIC?

  • Hotels that operate extended stay or serviced apartments in Europe, supported by 33% of LIKE MAGIC’s user base and 5/5 segment ratings.
  • Teams that want to automate check-in/out workflows with mobile tools to reduce front desk workload.
  • Properties aiming to increase ancillary revenue through room service ordering and upsell automation.
  • Hotels that require integration with multiple PMS and operational systems like Mews, apaleo, Oracle Hospitality, and SALTO access control.
  • Teams seeking a mobile-first, app-free guest experience to maximize guest adoption without install friction.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property requires multi-lingual automatic translations for a diverse international guest base.
  • You need robust local recommendations integrated into the guest app.
  • You have a small boutique hotel outside Europe with limited operational complexity.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Orana Stay?

  • Boutique hotels primarily in Australia and Asia Pacific, reflected in 100% of its user base and perfect 5/5 ratings.
  • Properties that prioritize guest self-service and digital concierge features like local recommendations and real-time information.
  • Hotels seeking a low-cost, simple app to reduce guest inquiries and improve direct guest communication.
  • Teams wanting automatic translation features to serve multilingual guests.
  • Hotels that benefit from integrations with popular PMS platforms like Cloudbeds and Guesty.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property needs operational automation features like mobile check-in/out or room service ordering.
  • You require extensive PMS and operational system integrations.
  • You operate larger or extended stay properties outside the boutique segment.

LIKE MAGIC vs Orana Stay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

LIKE MAGIC and Orana Stay both deliver flawless digital guest experiences but differ fundamentally in operational depth and market focus. LIKE MAGIC excels in automating guest workflows across check-in, checkout, and room service, integrating with a broad selection of PMS and operational tools. Orana Stay focuses on guest-facing convenience features like multilingual support and local recommendations, tailored to boutique hotels in Australia and nearby regions.

Choose LIKE MAGIC if your hotel is a mid-sized extended stay or serviced apartment property in Europe seeking to reduce front desk workload through automation, increase ancillary revenue with room service ordering, and leverage 11 integrations with major PMS and access control platforms. Its 26 reviews averaging 5/5 demonstrate strong operator satisfaction and scalability.

Choose Orana Stay if you operate a small boutique hotel, especially in Australia or Asia Pacific, and want a simple, cost-effective digital concierge app that reduces guest inquiries, supports multiple languages, and offers local recommendations. Its fewer integrations and limited user base imply suitability for hotels with straightforward operational needs.

The data supports a clear operational and segment-driven choice: LIKE MAGIC for automation-heavy, integrated European properties; Orana Stay for guest-centric, boutique hotels seeking simplicity and multilingual support.

LIKE MAGIC 和 Orana Stay 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
起始价格 起价 $700/月 起价 $400/月

功能对比:LIKE MAGIC 与 Orana Stay

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Orana Software Orana Software
▾ Communication & Messaging
84%
67%
自动翻译(多语言)
请求管理
客房服务订购
来宾消息
应用下载
网络应用
▾ Content Management
75%
100%
酒店目录
客人资料
当地推荐
网络应用
▾ Upselling
100%
50%
付款
客房服务订购
▾ Request Management
100%
25%
请求管理
客房服务订购
移动结帐
手机值机

实际成果:LIKE MAGIC 对比 Orana Software(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
LIKE MAGIC The Zipper Hotel & Apartments 小型
+ 80% fewer staff while maintaining operational efficiency
+ 4.6/5 rating on Google, 8.8+ on Booking.com
+ Easy to understand and use - employees have fun to work with. Fully trained staff in just 1.5 days.

"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."

Orana Software Orana Software

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
LIKE MAGIC Stay Kooook 小型
+ Lean operations: Reduced staffing needs to 2.5 FTE for an 85-room property
+ Guest Journey adoption: Enabled 95% of guests to manage their entire stay digitally.
+ Decreased staff training time to under four hours for new employees.

"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."

Cedric Maderer
Cedric Maderer
Product Manager
Orana Software Orana Software

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Orana Software:总结

LIKE MAGIC
LIKE MAGIC
5.0/5 来自 26 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

运营效率和节省时间 100% 正面

用户表示,LikeMagic 通过集成和自动化工作流程减少了手动操作,节省了大量时间。该平台被描述为帮助员工减少重复性任务和实施负担,从而更专注于宾客。

预订引擎的性能和易用性 100% 正面

评论者喜欢快速且易于使用的预订引擎,认为它对客人和员工来说清晰且直观。一些人也希望预订体验能有更多功能和更高的灵活性。

企业/B2B功能缺失 75% 正面

一条评论指出该平台更适合B2B需求,但仍缺乏更高级的企业功能。期望的功能包括预订变更、可用性日历,以及针对企业客户、差旅管理公司(TMC)和合作伙伴的定制功... 一条评论指出该平台更适合B2B需求,但仍缺乏更高级的企业功能。期望的功能包括预订变更、可用性日历,以及针对企业客户、差旅管理公司(TMC)和合作伙伴的定制功能。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

定制和品牌限制 100% 负面

一些评论者对缺少或减少定制选项表示担忧,尤其是在后台品牌和客人门户用户体验方面。这些不足对希望应用程序与其品牌和服务风格紧密匹配的酒店来说非常重要。

排名更高的方面

小型(10-24 间客房) #10 vs #25
精品酒店 #18 vs #32
机场/会议酒店 #20 vs #34

独特功能

客房服务订购 应用下载 移动结帐 手机值机
5.0/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 11 个集成
查看资料
Orana Software
Orana Software
5.0/5 来自 2 条评价

排名更高的方面

Oc #3 vs #5

独特功能

自动翻译(多语言) 当地推荐
5.0/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 6 个集成
查看资料

关于 LIKE MAGIC 与 Orana Stay 的常见问题

LIKE MAGIC 能否替代 Orana Stay?

这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC 和 Orana Stay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC 提供 11 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Orana Stay 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。LIKE MAGIC 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 5.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC 或 Orana Stay 是否提供免费方案?

LIKE MAGIC:否。Orana Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 LIKE MAGIC 和 Orana Stay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 74,Orana Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息