项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 50 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Gastfreund 在支持、入职培训和响应能力方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有手机值机以及移动结帐等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 50 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 48 | 2 |
在分析了 50 条经验证的评价后,Gastfreund 用户最看重其 支持、入职培训和响应能力, 访客应用程序的易用性和设置便捷性, 宾客信息和电子目录,而 Orana Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持、入职培训和响应能力
▾
|
|
|
+
访客应用程序的易用性和设置便捷性
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客信息和电子目录
▾
|
|
|
+
减少接待工作量和自助服务沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
当地推荐、短途旅行和活动推广
▾
|
|
|
−
多语言支持和翻译质量
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 18 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #22 1 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #17 6 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #18 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 47 条评价 | — |
Gastfreund and Orana Stay both serve as digital guest apps to enhance guest communication and reduce front desk workload. Gastfreund stands out with its modular platform that integrates a guest app, info channels, hotel newspaper, and internal team communication, appealing to hotels and holiday rentals primarily in the German-speaking DACH region and Italy. Orana Stay offers a branded mobile app functioning as a 24-hour digital concierge focused on guest self-service and upselling, targeting boutique hotels in Australia and nearby markets.
Both products aim to centralize guest information, automate common inquiries, and promote ancillary revenue. Gastfreund’s broader feature set and integrations support larger or multi-property operations with complex needs, while Orana Stay fits smaller boutique hotels looking for straightforward guest engagement with fewer integrations. Operationally, Gastfreund reduces front desk queries by up to 30% and saves 20 hours monthly, while Orana Stay reports saving substantial staff time by automating guest questions and enabling contactless service.
If your property is a boutique hotel in Australia or similar markets with a small team and you prioritize a simple, fully branded guest app that handles FAQs and bookings with local support, Orana Stay’s perfect 5/5 rating (though based on just 2 reviews) suggests it fits well. For hotels in Europe, especially German-speaking countries or Italy, with vacation rentals, resorts, or campgrounds, Gastfreund’s 4.8/5 rating across 48 reviews (35 recent) and extensive integrations make it better suited to properties demanding multilingual support, team communication, and features like mobile check-in and room service ordering.
Data for larger branded hotels, resorts, or properties with extended stays heavily favors Gastfreund, which maintains high ratings across segments and offers up to 30% ancillary revenue uplift. Orana Stay’s limited review volume and boutique hotel focus mean its fit for other segments is less proven. Properties needing deep PMS integrations and a complete operational platform should prefer Gastfreund.
Gastfreund and Orana Stay both receive top marks for ease of use and onboarding from reviewers: Gastfreund scores 4.6/5 for ease of use and onboarding with 48 reviews, while Orana Stay holds perfect 5/5 scores but only from 2 reviews. Reviewers of Gastfreund highlight its intuitive backend and guest interface that require minimal training, enabling quick setup and daily use for staff and guests. Orana Stay reviewers praise the app’s simplicity and ease for guests, emphasizing straightforward booking and information delivery.
Neither product’s ratings gap exceeds 0.3 with sufficient review volume to determine a clear winner. Both platforms achieve strong adoption by front desk and management teams, supporting operational workflows with minimal friction.
Edge: Even.
Gastfreund offers four unique features absent from Orana Stay: room service ordering, app download options including native apps and progressive web apps, mobile check-in, and mobile checkout. These features reduce front desk workload by enabling guests to order services and manage arrival and departure digitally, improving operational efficiency for hotels with higher guest volumes or on-site dining.
Orana Stay does not list any features unique to its platform but includes standard guest app functionalities such as reception messaging, maps & directions, and weather updates. Both share eight common features including guest communication, booking capabilities, and branded app delivery.
Gastfreund’s broader feature set supports more comprehensive guest self-service and operational integration, particularly valuable in properties requiring digital check-in/out and ancillary service upsells.
Edge: Gastfreund.
Gastfreund earns a 4.6/5 customer support rating from 48 reviewers, reflecting consistent praise for fast, professional assistance and thorough onboarding. However, some reviews mention occasional delays and dissatisfaction with contract terms. Orana Stay has perfect 5/5 support and onboarding ratings but from only 2 reviews, limiting the reliability of this data.
Guests and managers using Gastfreund appreciate responsive support that facilitates smooth implementation and issue resolution, essential for larger teams. Orana Stay’s Australian-based support receives specific praise for timezone alignment and quick communication during rollout, which benefits local clients.
Edge: Even.
Gastfreund integrates with 17 verified partners, including major PMS systems like Mews, protel, Casablanca, RoomRaccoon, and Little Hotelier, offering seamless data exchange for reservations, billing, and guest profiles. Orana Stay lists 6 verified partners, including RMS, Cloudbeds, Guesty, and OwnerRez, with RoomRaccoon as the only shared integration.
Gastfreund’s wider integration network supports complex hotel operations, enabling automated guest data syncing and reducing manual input. Orana Stay’s integrations focus on popular boutique property management systems but may limit connectivity for diverse portfolios.
Edge: Gastfreund.
Gastfreund holds a 4.8/5 overall rating across 48 reviews, with 35 in the last six months maintaining the same score, indicating a stable and current product experience. Orana Stay achieves a 5/5 rating but from only 2 reviews with no recent activity, providing limited evidence of ongoing satisfaction.
Segment-specific ratings for Gastfreund show 5/5 in vacation rentals, branded hotels, resorts, and RV parks, with a slight dip to 4.2/5 in limited service hotels and 2.8/5 in bed & breakfasts, suggesting some variability in fit. Orana Stay’s ratings cover only boutique hotels (5/5 across 2 reviews) and one airport/conference hotel (5/5).
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Gastfreund’s ratings carry more weight and reliability for most hotel segments.
Edge: Even.
Gastfreund’s base price is $100, with no monthly flat fee or per-room pricing and no implementation fee. Orana Stay’s base price is $400 under similar terms. Neither offers a freemium or trial option.
Gastfreund’s lower base price supports cost-conscious properties or larger portfolios seeking modular guest experience tools. Orana Stay’s higher entry price may reflect a more boutique-focused, all-in-one app solution but might limit adoption for smaller hotels or vacation rentals.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Gastfreund and Orana Stay both deliver branded guest apps that reduce front desk interruptions and enhance guest communication. Gastfreund’s modular platform and broader feature set fit larger or multi-segment properties in Europe needing integrations, multilingual support, and operational tools like mobile check-in and room service. Orana Stay targets boutique hotels in Australia with a simple, fully branded app focusing on guest self-sufficiency and upselling.
Choose Gastfreund if your hotel requires seamless PMS integration with systems like Mews or protel and values features that free up front desk staff, such as mobile check-in/out and room service ordering. Its 48 reviews averaging 4.8/5 and 17 integrations underpin strong operational reliability. Choose Orana Stay if you run a small boutique hotel in Australia prioritizing easy guest communication, direct booking encouragement, and local support, as reflected in its perfect 5/5 rating from 2 reviews and focus on guest self-sufficiency.
Gastfreund’s lower price point and regional strength balance Orana Stay’s localized support and boutique hotel focus, making the choice depend heavily on geography, property size, and feature priorities.
酒店客人应用 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $100/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"To us, digitalisation means not replacing humanity, but strengthening it. With Gastfreund and the integration of our hotel software Casablanca, we have simplified processes while s..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
好评如潮,Gastfreund 的入职流程、培训以及出现问题时的快速响应都备受赞誉。但与此同时,也有一条评论指出其响应速度极慢,且业务关系处理不当,由此可见,服... 好评如潮,Gastfreund 的入职流程、培训以及出现问题时的快速响应都备受赞誉。但与此同时,也有一条评论指出其响应速度极慢,且业务关系处理不当,由此可见,服务的一致性对买家而言至关重要。
评论者经常提到,Gastfreund 对客人和酒店团队来说都非常直观易用,设置、自定义和日常使用都很简单。易于管理这一点至关重要,因为它能降低内部工作量,并加快... 评论者经常提到,Gastfreund 对客人和酒店团队来说都非常直观易用,设置、自定义和日常使用都很简单。易于管理这一点至关重要,因为它能降低内部工作量,并加快客人应用程序的上线和维护速度。
评论者普遍认为,Gastfreund 将酒店的重要信息集中起来,方便客人通过自己的设备即时查找 Wi-Fi、退房时间、酒店规则、设施和酒店详情。酒店方面也认为,这是一... 评论者普遍认为,Gastfreund 将酒店的重要信息集中起来,方便客人通过自己的设备即时查找 Wi-Fi、退房时间、酒店规则、设施和酒店详情。酒店方面也认为,这是一种切实可行的提升宾客体验的方式,同时还能减少前台工作人员重复询问的问题。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多酒店利用 Gastfreund 展示当地景点、短途旅行、徒步旅行建议和休闲活动,从而提升宾客参与度并有可能增加辅助收入。评论者喜欢这种在宾客入住前后激发他们旅... 许多酒店利用 Gastfreund 展示当地景点、短途旅行、徒步旅行建议和休闲活动,从而提升宾客参与度并有可能增加辅助收入。评论者喜欢这种在宾客入住前后激发他们旅行灵感的方式,但也有一些评论指出,他们需要手动创建很多此类内容。
多篇评论都提到多语言功能是关键需求,尤其对于国际游客或季节性游客而言。虽然提供多种语言服务被认为很有价值,但用户也反映存在翻译缺失、覆盖范围不全以及部... 多篇评论都提到多语言功能是关键需求,尤其对于国际游客或季节性游客而言。虽然提供多种语言服务被认为很有价值,但用户也反映存在翻译缺失、覆盖范围不全以及部分语言翻译质量较差等问题,这些问题可能会限制其实用性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Gastfreund 和 Orana Stay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Gastfreund 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Orana Stay 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Orana Stay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Gastfreund:否。Orana Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Gastfreund 的 HT Score 为 83,Orana Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐