The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel is crucial for streamlining transactions, improving guest experience, and ensuring operational efficiency. Both Payfast by Network and Zil Money aim to facilitate these processes; however, their strengths diverge significantly. Payfast holds no recent reviews or detailed features, while Zil Money benefits from over 50 reviews, recent positive feedback, and a robust feature set. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Payfast by Network appears to be an obscure product with no recent reviews, ratings, or user feedback available, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. Conversely, Zil Money boasts a solid review count of 54, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature richness, which strongly supports its reliability. Given the stark contrast, your hotel should favor Zil Money based on proven user feedback rather than unverified claims.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, established platform with extensive features, go with Zil Money. Its multiple payment methods, including international payments, virtual cards, ACH, wire transfers, and printable checks, cater to diverse financial workflows. If, however, your hotel’s priority is a minimal, perhaps less feature-intensive solution with no recent reviews, Payfast might seem appealing—though its lack of current user feedback makes it a risky choice. Ultimately, Zil Money’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable option for hotels seeking comprehensive payment management.
Payfast’s usability cannot be assessed due to the absence of reviews or user feedback. Zil Money, on the other hand, enjoys a 4.5/5 ease of use rating based on 54 reviews, with users frequently praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment workflows. Many reviewers highlight how quickly new users can onboard and begin processing transactions without hassle. Edge: Zil Money.
Payfast offers no unique features or detailed capabilities, making it impossible to compare on that front. Zil Money provides a suite of 15 features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and Pre-Authorizations, all of which are critical for modern hotel operations. Its feature set supports flexible, international, and contactless transactions—features that Payfast currently lacks. Edge: Zil Money.
Payfast’s customer support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, rendering its support quality impossible to evaluate. Zil Money, however, earns a 4.5/5 support rating, with reviews mentioning strong, responsive customer service. Users appreciate prompt assistance and detailed onboarding, although some suggest minor improvements for faster response times. Given the recent positive feedback, Zil Money’s support is better positioned to assist your hotel effectively. Edge: Zil Money.
Payfast’s integration ecosystem appears limited, with only one verified partner—Yanolja Cloud Solution—highlighted. Zil Money, meanwhile, has no verified partners but offers an API, facilitating custom integrations. While Zil Money’s integrations are not as extensive out-of-the-box, its API allows tailored connections with your existing hotel management systems. However, the current integration count favors Payfast for immediate connectivity. Edge: Payfast (though limited).
Payfast’s review landscape is nonexistent, preventing any rating insights. Zil Money, conversely, has a 62.92/100 score based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, customer support, and value. Hotels across various segments—luxury, budget, and boutique—rate Zil Money highly, with an 87% likelihood of recommendation. This consistent, recent positive feedback underscores its reliability. Edge: Zil Money.
Payfast’s pricing details are unavailable, possibly indicating a lack of transparent or established pricing structures. Zil Money charges a $400 base price, with no mention of monthly fees or per-room charges. Its 15-day free trial offers an opportunity to evaluate the platform before committed investment. Given the transparency and recent reviews, Zil Money’s cost structure provides clearer value insights.
The core difference is that Zil Money offers a detailed, feature-rich platform with proven user satisfaction, while Payfast provides no recent reviews or verifiable performance data. Zil Money’s extensive features, recent positive feedback, and support quality make it the better choice for hotels looking for reliable, flexible payment management.
If your hotel needs a platform with multi-currency support, international payment options, and a proven user base, go with Zil Money. Its multiple features and recent reviews demonstrate that it can handle complex hotel payment workflows effectively.
If your hotel only requires a basic payment processor without advanced features, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited recent user feedback, Payfast might suffice. However, due to its lack of recent reviews and features, Zil Money remains the more dependable investment for most hotels.
In summary, for hotels prioritizing reliability, comprehensive features, and positive recent feedback, Zil Money stands out as the clear choice. Always consider your specific operational needs and whether a platform’s capabilities align with your long-term growth plans.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Payfast by Network 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Payfast by Network 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Payfast by Network:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Payfast 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问