The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 21 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 31 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 28 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #3 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 61 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #3 1 条评价 |
When evaluating payment processing solutions for your hotel, the core question is: which product aligns better with your operational needs and growth goals? PesoPay and ROH both address the essential need for secure, efficient payment handling, but they differ significantly in scope, user experience, and market presence. PesoPay’s minimal feature set and lack of recent reviews make it a less reliable choice, whereas ROH’s extensive recent review count and high ratings suggest a more proven, adaptable platform.
Are you looking for a straightforward payment gateway or a comprehensive financial infrastructure?
PesoPay aims to serve as a basic payments gateway, primarily focusing on processing transactions with no added features or recent activity. Its zero-star ratings and no reviews in the past six months indicate it’s either inactive or lacks customer engagement, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliable support.
In contrast, ROH boasts a perfect 100 in its HT score, a 4.97/5 customer support rating, and 65 detailed reviews, with 10 recent ones. Its recent reviews consistently praise its ease of use and automation features, reflecting active customer engagement. Would you prefer a product with proven reliability and ongoing support, or one with no current user validation?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich payments platform that enhances operational efficiency, go with ROH. Its 19 unique features—such as refund management, recurring payments, and multi-processor gateway—support a broad range of financial workflows, ideal for medium to large hotels or hotel groups.
If your hotel simply requires a basic, no-frills payment processing tool and you’re comfortable with limited support, PesoPay might suffice. However, given its lack of recent reviews and zero star ratings, ROH clearly offers a more dependable solution for hotels aiming for operational growth and customer satisfaction.
ROH’s average ease of use rating is 4.95/5, with recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, simple invoice management, and minimal training requirements. Users find it straightforward to send and receive payments, often commenting, “The easiest way to send and receive payments!”
PesoPay scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no reviews to suggest it has a user-friendly experience. Its lack of recent activity indicates it may not have a modern, accessible interface or support for onboarding.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, and payment splitting—tools that streamline complex financial processes. Its features support multiple payment methods like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and credit card options, plus PCI compliance for security.
PesoPay provides no additional features beyond basic transaction processing, making it unsuitable for hotels seeking automation or advanced payment options. Its limited functionality hampers scalability or integration into broader revenue management systems.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s support ratings are nearly perfect at 4.97/5, with reviews praising its support staff and onboarding process. Hotel staff report that “support is great,” and onboarding is rated 4.92/5, indicating strong ongoing service and training.
PesoPay has a 0/5 support rating, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality. The lack of user feedback makes it impossible to trust its service quality, especially for critical financial operations.
Edge: ROH.
ROH integrates with Oracle Hospitality and Yanolja Cloud, providing basic but relevant partnerships for hotel operations. PesoPay’s single verified partner limits its integration ecosystem significantly.
For hotels relying on existing property management or sales platforms, ROH’s broader integration options provide greater flexibility. PesoPay’s minimal integrations restrict its adaptability and potential for automation.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s reviews, though limited in number, are recent and overwhelmingly positive, with a 9.91/5 NPS score and 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like luxury and boutique hotels rate it highly for ease of use and support—critical factors for guest satisfaction.
PesoPay’s zero-star ratings and absence of recent reviews make it impossible to determine customer satisfaction. Its lack of feedback suggests it is not trusted or actively used by hotels.
Edge: ROH.
PesoPay’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent fee structure, raising questions about its value. Conversely, ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly base fee, with no hidden costs or implementation fees.
Given the transparent pricing and recent positive reviews, ROH presents a clear value proposition. The absence of cost data for PesoPay complicates budget planning and ROI evaluation.
ROH and PesoPay serve vastly different needs. PesoPay offers a bare-bones approach with no recent activity or reviews, making it unreliable for hotels prioritizing stability and support. ROH provides a comprehensive, well-reviewed payment infrastructure with numerous features, recent positive feedback, and strong support.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich platform to handle complex payment workflows, ROH is the clear choice. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate it’s a trusted, scalable solution.
However, if your operation is small, and you only require basic transaction processing without the need for automation or integrations, PesoPay could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and support makes it a risky option.
In conclusion, for hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, ROH stands out as the more dependable and feature-complete platform.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。
用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。PesoPay 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。PesoPay 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
PesoPay:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。PesoPay 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问