The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 203 条经验证的评价后,Preno 用户最看重其 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #13 80 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #32 15 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #46 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #39 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 65 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #21 17 条评价 | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 26 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #27 7 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 13 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #20 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #13 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Preno by Preno addresses a wide range of hospitality needs with a user-friendly interface and strong integrations, while Redforts by Redforts offers a comprehensive all-in-one solution that emphasizes automation and cost-effectiveness. Both aim to streamline your management tasks, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence.
Preno enjoys a higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and a broader global footprint, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Are you ready to see which system fits your hotel best?
Both Preno and Redforts serve as cloud-based PMS solutions designed to simplify hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Preno emphasizes ease of use, integrations, and management of multiple properties, while Redforts concentrates on automation, module customization, and price competitiveness.
Preno's strengths lie in its intuitive interface, robust integrations like Xero and SiteMinder, and its capacity to handle multi-property operations effortlessly. Redforts, on the other hand, offers a broad suite of functionalities—ranging from online check-in to POS integrations—at a lower price point and with an emphasis on automation.
While Preno caters more to mid-sized properties seeking reliability and advanced features, Redforts may appeal to smaller hotels or hostels prioritizing automation and affordability. Does your hotel need a straightforward, well-rated system, or a flexible, feature-rich platform?
If your hotel operates multiple properties or seeks a system with proven integrations like Xero and SiteMinder, Preno is the clear choice. Its 144 reviews with a 4.73/5 rating and recent positive feedback confirm its reliability for hotels that value operational transparency and multi-property management.
Conversely, if your hotel needs an affordable, all-in-one platform with extensive automation features and module flexibility, Redforts is worth considering. Its 40 reviews, though with a lower overall rating, highlight ease of use and automation that can benefit smaller hotels, hostels, or properties with limited tech resources.
Your decision should align with your hotel size, operational complexity, and budget constraints. Do you prioritize proven integrations and a higher overall rating? Or is affordability and automation more critical for your property?
Preno scores 4.78/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive layout, simple navigation, and quick onboarding experience. Users find it accessible regardless of their tech skills, and support responsiveness enhances the onboarding process.
Redforts also maintains a high usability score of 4.68/5, with many reviews emphasizing its straightforward setup and logical interface. However, some users mention that interface updates would further improve their experience.
Edge: Preno. Its higher overall rating, larger user base, and recent reviews underscore its superior ease of use.
Preno offers 30 core features, including unique functionalities like automated night audits, ancillary revenue tracking, and integrated CRS—features that streamline back-office operations. Its automation features reduce manual tasks, saving time and decreasing errors.
Redforts provides 26 core features, with many focused on automation and operational efficiency, including online check-in, digital registration, and POS integration. It also offers modules like revenue management and rate shopper, which can be activated as needed.
While Redforts covers a broad set of functionalities, Preno’s unique features like automated night audits and integrated CRS give it an edge in operational depth. Which set of features aligns better with your property’s needs?
Edge: Preno. Its additional features and automation capabilities set it apart.
Preno’s support team is highly rated at 4.8/5, with reviewers praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and troubleshooting. Comments highlight that Preno’s support makes the transition smooth and ongoing use reliable.
Redforts scores 4.53/5, with reviews commending their friendly and efficient customer service. Users note quick response times but mention that interface updates could enhance overall satisfaction.
Edge: Preno. Its higher support score and more recent reviews suggest a more responsive, dependable support experience.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including major channel managers, booking engines, and accounting tools like Xero and TrustYou. These integrations expand its functionality and reduce manual data entry.
Redforts offers only 2 verified integrations—WuBook and Mr Winston—limiting its connectivity options and potentially requiring manual workarounds for other platforms.
Edge: Preno. Its extensive integration network enhances automation and streamlines operations.
Preno’s 144 reviews with a 4.73/5 rating reflect broad satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels and motels. Recent reviews praise its ease of use and support, reinforcing its reputation among users managing multiple properties or seeking reliability.
Redforts, with only 40 reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, indicates limited user satisfaction and less confidence among hoteliers. The reviews emphasize ease of use but also mention interface outdatedness.
Edge: Preno. Its higher overall rating and more recent positive feedback make it the preferred choice.
Preno’s pricing starts at $800 per month, with no freemium or flexible plans, reflecting its focus on mid-sized and larger hotels. Its higher price correlates with more features and integrations.
Redforts charges $500 per month, offering a lower-cost alternative with less extensive integrations. Details on potential discounts or custom plans are not specified, but its price point appeals to smaller properties.
Your budget and required features should guide your choice: if cost is a concern, Redforts offers a more affordable entry point; for more advanced needs, Preno’s higher price may be justified.
Preno offers a high-rated, feature-rich PMS built for hotels that need reliable management across multiple properties. Its extensive integrations and support make it a robust choice for mid-sized and larger hotels.
Redforts functions as a cost-effective, flexible platform suitable for small hotels, hostels, or properties prioritizing automation and ease of use over extensive integrations. Its lower price point and simple setup appeal to budget-conscious operators.
If your hotel values proven integrations, a higher overall rating, and scalability, Preno is the safer bet. For smaller properties needing an affordable, straightforward, automated system, Redforts may better fit your needs.
In conclusion, Preno's more recent reviews, higher overall rating, and broader market presence affirm its position as the more dependable and comprehensive PMS solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Preno 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Preno 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Preno:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Preno 的 HT Score 为 80,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问