The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Preno 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Smart Finder 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 160 | 0 |
在分析了 160 条经验证的评价后,Preno 用户最看重其 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management,而 Smart Finder 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #13 80 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #32 15 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #46 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #39 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 65 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #21 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 26 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #27 7 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 13 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #20 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #13 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and Soraso by Smart Finder hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline property management, but Preno’s extensive features, proven market presence, and recent positive reviews make it a more compelling choice for most hoteliers today. Soraso’s offerings are less clear, with no recent reviews or detailed feature data, making Preno the safer, more validated option.
Preno is a cloud-based PMS designed for hotels seeking a user-friendly, feature-rich platform. Soraso, on the other hand, lacks detailed public information and recent customer feedback, which diminishes confidence in its suitability. Are you ready to invest in a system with proven success and extensive support?
Preno and Soraso both aim to simplify hotel operations, but Preno’s review volume and recent ratings strongly suggest it’s a more reliable choice. Preno’s 144 reviews in the last six months, with a near-perfect overall rating of 4.73/5 and a 95% likelihood to recommend, signal a mature, well-supported product. Soraso has no recent reviews or detailed feedback, which makes assessing its effectiveness difficult.
Preno’s platform is praised for its intuitive interface, robust feature set, and high customer satisfaction—attributes that Soraso’s sparse data doesn’t demonstrate. If your hotel needs a proven system that improves efficiency and guest experience, Preno clearly leads.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive property management platform with strong integrations, automation, and a track record of customer satisfaction, go with Preno. Its extensive features like payment processing, channel management, guest CRM, and mobile app support make it suitable for a wide range of property types, especially boutique hotels and motels.
If your hotel has very specific, niche requirements or prefers a solution with minimal public feedback and unknown support quality, Soraso might be worth exploring. However, without recent reviews or a broad feature set, Preno remains the safer, more reliable investment for most hoteliers today.
Preno’s ease of use is highly rated, with a 4.78/5 score based on reviews emphasizing its intuitive layout and straightforward navigation. Users often mention that staff can learn the system quickly, reducing training time. Preno’s onboarding score of 4.68/5 further indicates a smooth implementation process.
Soraso’s user experience details are unavailable, making it impossible to compare. Given Preno’s clear positive feedback, it’s safe to assume it offers a more user-friendly experience. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers over 30 unique features, including integrated payment processing, real-time status updates, automation tools, guest CRM, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and native email marketing. Many of these are absent from Soraso, which provides no publicly listed features or additional modules.
Without detailed feature data or reviews for Soraso, Preno’s comprehensive suite of tools gives it a clear advantage. If feature depth matters for your operations, Preno’s extensive capabilities make it the better choice. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support team earns a 4.8/5 rating, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses and a dedicated support staff that guides users through onboarding and troubleshooting. Guests often praise Preno for its responsiveness and proactive assistance.
Soraso offers no publicly available support ratings or customer reviews, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Preno’s well-documented positive support experience, it’s the safer bet for your team’s operational needs. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, booking engines, and accounting tools like Xero. Its extensive integration ecosystem supports seamless operations across numerous hotel tech stacks.
Soraso only has 2 verified integrations and does not list any major partners publicly. For a hotel seeking connectivity to other systems, Preno’s broader integration options are a significant advantage. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews are recent, with 144 reviews in the past six months, and a 4.73/5 overall score. Hoteliers across segments like boutique hotels, motels, and bed & breakfasts frequently praise its ease of use, support, and feature depth.
Soraso has no recent reviews or ratings to indicate hotel satisfaction. Without customer feedback, it’s impossible to determine which product is favored by users. Based on current data, Preno’s high ratings and recent reviews make it the clear leader. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s pricing starts at $800 per month, with no free tier, trial, or flexible payment options listed publicly. This flat rate includes access to all features, with no implementation fees or hidden costs.
Soraso’s pricing information is unavailable, limiting direct comparison. However, without transparent pricing or trial access, Preno’s predictable fee structure and known value make it easier to budget and plan. Edge: Preno.
Preno is a comprehensive, well-reviewed PMS with a strong track record, making it suitable for a wide range of hotels. Its extensive features, high customer satisfaction, and recent positive reviews make it a safer choice for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel values a proven system with lots of integrations, automation, and support, Preno will serve you better. Conversely, Soraso’s limited public data and lack of recent reviews mean it’s a riskier, less validated option for those seeking reliability and proven value.
In summary, if you want a solution that’s trusted by many hotels worldwide and backed by current positive feedback, Preno is the clear winner. Only consider Soraso if your needs are very niche or if you have specific reasons to believe it fits your operations better, despite the lack of recent evidence.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Preno 和 Soraso 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Preno 和 Soraso 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Preno 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Soraso 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Preno:否。Soraso:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Preno 的 HT Score 为 80,Smart Finder 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问