The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,355 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Online Check-in and Centralized Messaging.
Planet 表现出色 在 功能和特点 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest profiles.
在分析了 1,355 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Planet 用户则强调 功能和特点, 易于使用, 多物业管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #10 79 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and protel PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and the kind of operational sophistication you require. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and customer support, making your decision critical. With Cloudbeds boasting recent, more numerous reviews, it currently holds a stronger reputation among hoteliers. Are you prioritizing ease of use and rapid growth, or advanced integration and flexibility?
Both Cloudbeds and protel address core property management needs, including reservations, billing, and guest data. Cloudbeds excels in providing an all-in-one, intuitive platform suitable for small to medium hotels aiming for rapid growth and simplicity, while protel offers a highly customizable, scalable solution favored by larger and complex operations, especially those with multi-property portfolios. Do you need a straightforward system that gets you up and running quickly, or a flexible backbone for complex, multi-location management?
While Cloudbeds’s strengths lie in its seamless integrations, real-time channel management, and user-friendly interface, protel’s core advantage is its extensive customization, broad integration ecosystem, and ability to operate in both cloud and on-premise environments. Which features are more vital for your hotel: quick onboarding and a unified system or tailored workflows and deep integration options?
If your hotel needs a modern, easy-to-learn platform that minimizes manual work and supports rapid growth—especially in the boutique, hostel, or small hotel segment—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its high user rating (4.63/5 vs 4.11/5) and recent review volume (1071 reviews, 81 in the last six months) reinforce its popularity and ongoing improvements.
Conversely, if your hotel management requires highly customizable workflows, extensive integration with third-party systems, or on-premise options for complex or large portfolios, protel’s versatility and its solid 3.74/5 value rating make it suitable. It's especially fitting for hotels with multi-property setups that prioritize detailed control over operations.
Cloudbeds’s intuitive and straightforward interface earns a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating from users, with many praising its minimal learning curve. Implementation is smooth, and staff adoption is generally high, making it ideal for hotels that want rapid deployment with minimal fuss.
Protel scores a 4.12/5 in ease of use, with some users noting the interface can be complex initially, especially for larger, multi-property environments. Support response times and system bugs have historically hampered onboarding, making it less suitable for hotels seeking quick, simple implementation.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 24 features exclusive to its system, including a channel manager, guest messaging, online check-in, and mobile app support. Its 40 shared features include inventory management, automated audits, and multilingual capabilities, making it a comprehensive platform.
Protel provides 6 unique features such as its booking engine and extensive customization options, but it relies heavily on its core property management functions. Cloudbeds’s broader feature set, especially in revenue management and automation, gives it a decisive edge.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores a 4.41/5, with recent reviews emphasizing responsive, helpful service and a proactive support team. Users comment on its quick response times and effective onboarding, especially vital for fast-growing hotels.
Protel’s support scores 3.95/5, with many reviews citing slow response times and unresolved bugs, especially after its acquisition by Planet. Some users express frustration with lengthy support queues and inconsistent service quality.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects to 190 verified partners, including major travel and payment integrations like Expedia, QuickBooks, and PayPal. Its extensive marketplace supports rapid integration of third-party tools, enhancing operational flexibility.
Protel boasts 195 verified integrations, including over 1,200 systems, with a focus on advanced technology and detailed customization. However, some users report lengthy, complex implementation processes.
Edge: protel.
Cloudbeds’s current rating of 4.63/5 and more recent reviews (81 in the past six months) show consistent, positive feedback from small and boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Hotels repeatedly praise its ease of use, support, and ability to grow with their needs.
Protel’s reviews (105 total, mostly older) highlight robust features but report frustrations with bugs and slow support, especially in multi-property environments. Its ratings are lower, reflecting less recent user satisfaction.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges $600 monthly, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its focus on small to mid-sized hotels willing to invest in an all-in-one platform. The pricing emphasizes ease of deployment and extensive features.
Protel costs $500 monthly, with similar no-trial policies, but is often viewed as a more expensive option given its complexity and implementation requirements. Pricing differences are marginal but reflect different target markets and feature sets.
Cloudbeds provides an accessible, feature-rich platform that supports rapid growth and ease of use, making it ideal for small and boutique hotels. Its recent surge in reviews and higher ratings suggest it’s the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking a reliable, modern system that scales.
Protel, with its broad customization and integration options, caters best to larger, complex properties or chains needing detailed operational control. However, its slower support response and older reviews make it less appealing for hotels prioritizing user experience and support.
If your hotel values simplicity, support, and scalable features, Cloudbeds is the better fit. For those with intricate needs and a focus on deep customization, protel remains a viable but more demanding option.
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问