The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #34 4 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #30 10 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 11 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #27 11 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #33 3 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #29 3 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #28 1 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #42 0 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #19 4 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #4 10 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel involves balancing features, support, ease of use, and overall value. Both RateTiger Booking Engine by eRevMax and Roiback offer solutions that aim to increase bookings and streamline operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns best with your hotel's size, strategic goals, and existing technology stack.
eRevMax's RateTiger has been around since 2001 and boasts a larger user base, yet it has fewer recent reviews, which raises questions about ongoing support and development. Conversely, Roiback, founded in 2010, has more recent feedback from 43 reviews, indicating a more active user community and continuous improvements. Which platform's strengths will deliver the most value for your property?
Roiback outshines RateTiger in recent reviews, support ratings, and user satisfaction, making it the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing customer experience and ongoing innovation. With over three times the number of reviews and more recent feedback, Roiback demonstrates a stronger market presence and higher confidence among hoteliers. For a hotel that values a modern, flexible, and well-supported booking engine, Roiback is the clear winner.
Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings and synchronize rates across channels, but they differ in maturity and recent performance. RateTiger’s older foundation offers extensive integrations and a broad feature set, including advanced options like A/B testing and pooled inventory. However, its lack of recent reviews and a lower NPS score of 9/5 suggest that ongoing customer satisfaction and innovation may be lagging.
Roiback, with a recent surge in reviews and a higher NPS score of 9/5, shows stronger recent engagement and support. Its intuitive interface, detailed analytics, and continuous feature updates highlight a focus on user experience and adaptability. Does your hotel prioritize a familiar solution or one that is actively evolving?
If your hotel is seeking a solution with a proven track record, a wide array of integrations, and support for complex rate management, RateTiger may appeal — especially if you have existing systems that sync well with its offerings. Its strengths lie in managing ancillary services and supporting multiple currencies, which benefit larger or international hotels.
If your hotel needs a more flexible, customer-centric platform with recent reviews reflecting ongoing support and innovation, Roiback is the better fit. It excels in offering detailed analytics, a user-friendly interface, and a growing ecosystem of integrations, making it suitable for hotels eager to maximize direct sales and streamline operations. For properties emphasizing growth in direct bookings and digital marketing, Roiback’s recent momentum makes it a compelling choice.
RateTiger boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.29/5, with reviews praising its simple navigation and quick setup. Users highlight its ability to manage multiple channels efficiently, although some note that updates can be less intuitive. Onboarding is rated at 4.47/5, with positive comments on initial training support, but some find ongoing updates and features less user-friendly.
Roiback edges out slightly, with a 4.49/5 ease-of-use rating, and recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward booking process. Support staff responsiveness and personalized consulting are praised, with some users suggesting that speed and interface design could improve.
Edge: Roiback.
RateTiger offers 23 features, including exclusive options like A/B testing, pooled inventory, and advanced rate management tools. These features are tailored for hotels with complex revenue strategies and multiple distribution channels. Its offerings support ancillary revenues like spa or package add-ons, adding value for larger properties.
Roiback, with 31 features, provides comprehensive tools including conversion rate reports, Google Hotel Ads, TripAdvisor Bookings, and customizable add-ons. Its extensive array of marketing and analytics features supports direct booking growth, especially for hotels emphasizing digital marketing.
Edge: Roiback.
RateTiger’s support is rated at 4.47/5, with reviewers appreciating prompt responses and helpful training. However, some mention that ongoing support and feature updates could be more proactive.
Roiback’s support outperforms, with a 4.72/5 rating and reviews highlighting responsive, personalized service. Clients appreciate dedicated account managers and strategic advice, which have directly contributed to revenue increases.
Edge: Roiback.
RateTiger connects with 70 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and OTAs like GuestCentric, HotelTime, and RateGain. Its extensive network supports complex distribution needs and global reach.
Roiback, with 27 verified partners, offers native integrations with main channel managers, PMS, and hotel tech suppliers, including Siteminder, GuestCentric, and YieldPlanet. While fewer in number, its integrations are often more modern and tailored for seamless data exchange.
Edge: RateTiger.
Recent reviews show Roiback has a higher overall rating due to its support and feature richness. Hoteliers in diverse segments — including boutique, city center, and resort properties — express a preference for Roiback’s ongoing updates and customer service.
RateTiger’s older reviews are less recent and don’t reflect current satisfaction levels. Its users praise its reliability but acknowledge that customer support and interface updates could improve.
Edge: Roiback.
RateTiger’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; it typically involves a custom quote based on property size and needs. There is no freemium or trial available, which may complicate initial testing.
Roiback charges a base price of $500 per month with no free tier or trial. Its transparent pricing model allows hotels to evaluate the platform upfront and compare it directly against other solutions.
Not ideal if you seek rapid innovation, recent user feedback, or high-touch customer support.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on legacy systems, or if you prefer a highly specialized, niche platform for specific distribution channels.
The core difference lies in their market approach and recent customer feedback. RateTiger, with its long history, offers a broad feature set and extensive integrations, but its lack of recent reviews suggests possible stagnation or diminished support quality.
Roiback, with more recent reviews and higher support ratings, demonstrates active development, customer focus, and a modern interface. If your hotel seeks a solution that evolves alongside your needs, Roiback is the safer choice.
Choose RateTiger if you prioritize a proven, comprehensive platform with deep integrations and complex revenue management. Opt for Roiback if you want a more modern, flexible, and actively supported system that aligns with contemporary digital marketing strategies.
In conclusion, for hotels looking for a future-proof booking engine with high customer satisfaction and ongoing support, Roiback is the recommended pick. It's better suited for properties eager to grow direct bookings and streamline operations in today's competitive landscape.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 提供 70 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax):否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eRevMax 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问