项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 175 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Goki 在无钥匙进入方面表现出色,尤其适合赌场住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有访问管理解决方案(基于服务器)以及门锁升级套件等独家功能。
RemoteLock 凭借白标能力等独家功能脱颖而出。
基于 HTR 上 175 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 174 | 1 |
在分析了 175 条经验证的评价后,Goki 用户最看重其 无钥匙进入, 远程访问管理, 宾客沟通,而 RemoteLock 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无钥匙进入
▾
|
|
|
+
远程访问管理
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
与活动的融合
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
|
−
支持响应时间
▾
|
|
|
−
信号强度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙进入系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 85 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 58 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 11 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 50 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 20 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 45 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 1 条评价 | — |
Goki and RemoteLock both serve keyless entry needs but diverge sharply in reliability, customer satisfaction, and operational fit. Goki, with 174 reviews averaging 4.8/5, excels in hostels, limited service hotels, and boutique properties where integration with PMS and operational automation reduce front desk workload. RemoteLock’s single review at 0.5/5 highlights severe support and reliability issues, making it unsuitable for hotels seeking dependable access control.
Both products solve the same core problem: eliminating physical keys to streamline guest check-in and improve security. They automate issuing access codes linked to reservations, reducing manual front desk tasks and guest friction at arrival. However, Goki’s proven track record and feature depth far exceed RemoteLock’s unproven and poorly reviewed offering.
If your property is a small to medium hostel, boutique hotel, or limited service hotel with integration needs and a focus on guest experience, choose Goki. Its 116 hostel reviews average 4.8/5 and 114 limited service hotel reviews also rate it 4.8/5. Goki’s integration with multiple PMSs like Mews and RMS and features such as remote access management reduce operational overhead for properties with limited staff. This data reflects a broad and recent adoption mostly in Australia, Europe, and North America.
If your property is a single vacation rental or small property without extensive integration requirements and you prioritize a simple, standalone lock system, RemoteLock’s data is insufficient to recommend confidently. Its sole review from an RV park rates it 0.5/5, citing poor support and unresolved issues. The lack of recent reviews and case studies limits confidence in fit for any hotel segment.
Goki scores 4.8/5 for ease of use and 4.6/5 for onboarding across 174 reviews, indicating staff adoption is generally smooth despite some installation challenges reported, such as the need to drill for lock placement and occasional internet downtime impacting connectivity. Reviewers praise Goki’s app and UI as slick and user-friendly, with one noting “Just one click to create the code and send to the hotel’s guests,” reducing front desk workload for late arrivals.
RemoteLock rates 5/5 ease of use and 3/5 onboarding but from only one review, which also highlights operational instability due to support failures rather than UI complexity. The reviewer states the platform is easy when it works but does not trust the company to solve issues promptly.
Edge: Even.
Goki offers three unique features absent in RemoteLock: a server-based Access Management Solution that centralizes control for multi-property operators, a Door Lock Upgrade Kit simplifying hardware updates, and an Apple Watch App enabling staff to manage access on the go. These features enhance operational flexibility and reduce maintenance effort, particularly for tech-forward properties.
RemoteLock’s only unique feature is Whitelabel Capability, allowing branding customization for access portals, which may appeal to boutique hotels seeking brand consistency but lacks operational impact for most properties.
Both share nine common core features like generating unique entry codes and integrating with PMSs, but Goki’s additional features provide tangible operational improvements.
Edge: Goki.
Goki averages 4.7/5 customer support and 4.6/5 onboarding from 174 reviews. Users often highlight fast, accurate responses and proactive after-sales assistance, with one stating “Their customer support is the best. They reply to you very fast and very accurate.” Some concerns about geographic support gaps exist, but overall responsiveness is rated highly.
RemoteLock’s single review scores customer support 1/5 and onboarding 3/5, describing months-long delays resolving issues, lack of warranty assistance, and a feeling of being ignored after purchase: “If you have an issue... you have to push, beg and plead to get anything accomplished.” This severely undermines trust in ongoing support.
Edge: Even.
Goki leads with 22 verified integrations versus RemoteLock’s 18. Both share four PMS partners like WebRezPro and RMS, essential for hotel operations. Goki uniquely integrates with high-profile PMSs such as Mews, Cloudbeds, and Shiji Group, which serve boutique and limited service hotels requiring robust automation. RemoteLock’s unique partners, including RoomRaccoon and Hostaway, cater more to vacation rentals and boutique properties.
For hotels relying on widely adopted PMS or scaling portfolios, Goki’s broader integration portfolio reduces manual tasks and supports diverse operational workflows.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s overall rating is 4.8/5 across 174 reviews, with 95% likelihood to recommend. Segment-specific ratings include 4.8/5 in hostels (116 reviews), 4.8/5 in limited service hotels (114 reviews), and 4.8/5 in boutique hotels (50 reviews). This volume and consistency across segments validate Goki’s reliability and fit.
RemoteLock’s rating is 0.5/5 based on a single review from an RV park, which is insufficient to represent other hotel types. No recent reviews exist for either product, with Goki experiencing a 100% drop in review volume in the last six months compared to its prior average, indicating potential recent changes unreflected in ratings.
Edge: Even.
Goki’s base price is $400 per lock with no monthly or per-room fees and no trial or implementation fee disclosed. This pricing supports scalability without ongoing charges, appealing to hotels managing multiple units.
RemoteLock’s base price is $700 per lock, also with no monthly or per-room fees or trial. The higher upfront cost without clear value-added services makes it less competitive for budget-conscious properties.
Neither offers freemium models or trials, requiring buyers to commit before testing.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
Goki and RemoteLock both aim to replace physical keys with digital access codes, but Goki’s proven reliability, strong integration ecosystem, and positive user feedback sharply contrast with RemoteLock’s limited adoption and critical support failures. Goki’s 174 reviews averaging 4.8/5 across diverse hotel segments demonstrate operational stability and guest experience improvements.
Choose Goki if you prioritize integration with leading PMS platforms, remote access management, and comprehensive hardware-software solutions that reduce front desk workload and operational costs. Its additional features like the Apple Watch App and Door Lock Upgrade Kit further support scalable and efficient property management.
Choose RemoteLock only if your hotel needs whitelabel branding on access portals and can tolerate the risk of poor support and unresolved technical issues. Its limited review data and reported operational challenges make it unsuitable for most hotels seeking a dependable keyless entry system.
Note that Goki’s review activity has dropped sharply, with zero reviews in the last six months compared to an average of 13.3 per six months previously, suggesting recent product or service changes may not yet be reflected in ratings. Prospective buyers should verify current support and product status before purchase.
酒店无钥匙进入系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
门五金
|
|
|
| 门五金和锁具 | ||
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
|
▾
访问管理
|
|
|
| 访问管理(基于云) | ||
| 访问管理解决方案(基于服务器) | ||
| 访客管理仪表板 | ||
| Google 钱包集成 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 通知 | ||
|
▾
访客应用
|
|
|
| 移动应用 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
|
▾
兼容性
|
|
|
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
| 开发者 SDK | ||
| Google 钱包集成 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Goki 和 RemoteLock 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goki 提供 22 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RemoteLock 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。RemoteLock 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goki:否。RemoteLock:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Goki 的 HT Score 为 98,RemoteLock 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐