The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 818 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 818 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 246 | 572 |
在分析了 818 条经验证的评价后,RMS 用户最看重其 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 124 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 83 条评价 | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 6 条评价 | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 7 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 79 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 38 条评价 | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 52 条评价 | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #9 56 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 16 条评价 | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | #13 1 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations and guest experience. RMS by RMS and RoomRaccoon HMS both aim to streamline your property management but diverge in focus, features, and user feedback. RMS emphasizes broad enterprise capabilities with a long-standing market presence, while RoomRaccoon offers an intuitive, all-in-one platform tailored for small to mid-sized independent hotels. Which aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both products aim to reduce manual workload, improve revenue, and enhance guest satisfaction. But their approach and scalability differ—do you need a mature platform with extensive integrations or a user-friendly solution designed for rapid onboarding?
RMS and RoomRaccoon address core hotel management challenges—booking, channel distribution, and guest communications—but they serve different hotel profiles. RMS boasts a more extensive feature set with over 70 countries' presence and a focus on larger or multi-property operations, whereas RoomRaccoon caters primarily to small hotels, B&Bs, and independents with a clean, easy-to-use interface.
RMS, with a 4.56/5 overall rating from 224 reviews, is trusted by over 7,000 properties globally, including many extended-stay and boutique hotels. RoomRaccoon, with a slightly higher overall score of 4.95/5 from 484 reviews, is favored by smaller operators seeking straightforward automation and growth tools.
The key divergence lies in their user base and design focus. RMS's strengths are deep customization, complex reporting, and enterprise-oriented features, but it has been criticized for occasional software quirks and sluggish updates. RoomRaccoon’s appeal is its simplicity, rapid setup, and automated revenue features, though critics note occasional technical glitches.
Does your hotel prioritize extensive features and scalability, or does you need an intuitive platform that gets you operationally ready quickly?
If your hotel operates multiple properties or requires complex automation—like advanced revenue management, group bookings, and detailed reporting—RMS is the more suitable choice. Its broad feature set, proven scalability (e.g., Lafayette Hotels' 26-property growth), and extensive integrations make it ideal for larger teams or those planning expansion.
Conversely, if your hotel is a small to mid-sized independent or boutique property seeking simplicity, quick onboarding, and targeted automation, RoomRaccoon fits better. Its native features like AI pricing, upselling, and guest communication are proven to boost RevPAR and guest satisfaction, especially for properties that value ease of use over extensive customization.
In summary, choose RMS if your hotel needs enterprise features and multi-property management; opt for RoomRaccoon if you want a fast, user-friendly platform that powers growth for smaller hotels.
RoomRaccoon consistently earns higher ratings for ease of use, with a 4.87/5 score from reviews and praise for its intuitive, mobile-optimized interface. Small hoteliers highlight how quickly staff can learn the system, often within days, minimizing onboarding time.
RMS's usability scores around 4.3/5, with some users citing a steeper learning curve and occasional frustrations with navigating its extensive feature set. RMS's onboarding process is generally thorough but can feel complex for smaller teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS leads with an expansive feature count—38 shared features plus an additional 36 exclusive tools like a comprehensive revenue management module, integrated CRS, guest CRM, and automated night audit. It also offers native email marketing, group functions, and direct billing, making it a versatile platform for larger operations.
RoomRaccoon offers 19 unique features, including AI-powered pricing, automated upselling, multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, and a drag-and-drop tapechart, all tailored for small, growth-oriented hotels.
While RMS’s feature depth is unmatched for complex operations, RoomRaccoon’s automation and guest-centric tools are highly effective for small hotel growth. Which features are most critical to your current and future needs?
Edge: RMS.
RoomRaccoon enjoys slightly higher support ratings at 4.74/5, with many reviews praising its prompt, friendly service and dedicated onboarding. Users appreciate the hands-on approach and responsiveness, which help smaller hotels implement new features confidently.
RMS support scores 4.52/5 but has mixed reviews about responsiveness, with some users citing delays from account managers and frustrations with software updates disrupting workflows. RMS offers online 24/7 support, but some users find the responsiveness inconsistent.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS boasts 112 verified partner integrations, including major channel managers, OTAs, and property services like Sage, STR, and TrustYou, giving it a broad connectivity advantage. Its extensive API support makes it adaptable for larger, multi-channel operations.
RoomRaccoon has 88 verified partners, including popular integrations like SiteMinder, OTAs, and payment providers. Its marketplace supports over 300 integrations, but some users wish for broader or deeper connectivity with certain systems.
Edge: RMS.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews—more numerous and current—show a 4.95/5 rating, with many small hoteliers praising its simplicity, automation, and positive revenue impact. Its focus on ease of use and automation resonates especially with independent operators.
RMS’s scores stay high but are slightly behind, with an overall rating of 4.56/5, and larger properties or those with complex needs tend to rate it better. Smaller hotels often mention the steep learning curve and software quirks.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS is priced at $700/month with no implementation or trial fees, making it a significant investment suited for growing or multi-property hotels. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-grade features and extensive support.
RoomRaccoon costs $1,000/month, also without initial fees, but includes integrated property management, channel management, booking engine, and automation. Its higher price is justified for smaller hotels seeking an all-in-one, easy-to-implement system.
Both products lack free tiers or trials, so consider your budget and feature needs carefully.
RMS and RoomRaccoon each serve distinct hotel segments with different priorities. RMS excels in complex, multi-property environments where customization and integrations are paramount.
RoomRaccoon shines for small hotels seeking a user-friendly, growth-oriented PMS with automation features proven to boost revenue. If your hotel is a small independent or boutique, RoomRaccoon offers a compelling combination of simplicity and results.
Choose RMS if your hotel’s scale and complexity demand enterprise solutions; opt for RoomRaccoon if you want a quick, efficient platform to grow your independent hotel confidently.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 38 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RMS 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。RMS 提供 112 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RMS:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RMS 的 HT Score 为 86,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问