The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 531 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RMS 表现出色 在 技术支持和学习资源 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Housekeeping.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 PMS connectivity and Analytics dashboard.
基于 HTR 上 531 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $800/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 322 | 209 |
在分析了 531 条经验证的评价后,RMS 用户最看重其 技术支持和学习资源, 可扩展性和功能深度, 信托会计支持,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
技术支持和学习资源
▾
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
+
可扩展性和功能深度
▾
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
+
信托会计支持
▾
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
+
在线渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎和移动界面
▾
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
−
报告编写者的灵活性
▾
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
−
POS系统集成
▾
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 147 条评价 | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 102 条评价 | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #8 14 条评价 | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 100 条评价 | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 57 条评价 | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 50 条评价 | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 65 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 63 条评价 | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #23 20 条评价 | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #12 10 条评价 | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing between RMS by RMS and RoomRaccoon PMS by RoomRaccoon comes down to your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they differ in scale, feature depth, and target user profiles. RMS is a more extensive system with broader industry reach and more features, while RoomRaccoon offers a straightforward, all-in-one solution optimized for smaller hotels and independent operators. Which suits your hotel’s growth trajectory?
While RMS boasts more reviews and recent feedback, RoomRaccoon’s higher overall ratings and ease of use make it a compelling choice for many hoteliers. Are you ready to see how these two solutions compare across key aspects?
Both RMS and RoomRaccoon are property management systems designed to improve hotel efficiency, guest engagement, and revenue management. RMS provides a comprehensive platform with extensive features like trust accounting, multi-currency support, and guest CRM, often favored by larger or multi-property hotels. Meanwhile, RoomRaccoon’s strength lies in its user-friendly interface, automation, and integrated tools tailored for small to medium-sized properties.
RMS’s broader feature set and global presence make it ideal for hotels with complex operations or expanding portfolios. Conversely, RoomRaccoon’s simplified, all-in-one approach appeals to independent hoteliers seeking quick setup and ease of management. Do you need a scalable enterprise solution or a straightforward system to grow your boutique hotel?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, highly customizable platform supporting multi-lingual, multi-currency, and complex operational needs, RMS is the better fit. With over 7,000 users and more recent reviews, RMS offers proven scalability, trust accounting, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels with diverse guest profiles and large portfolios.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes simplicity, automation, and quick onboarding, RoomRaccoon is the superior option. Its intuitive interface, automation tools like guest communication, and affordable pricing make it ideal for small hotels, boutique properties, or independent operators looking to maximize efficiency without the complexity.
In essence, choose RMS for scalability and deep features, RoomRaccoon for ease and rapid deployment.
RoomRaccoon’s user ratings (4.74/5) surpass RMS (4.28/5), reflecting its focus on simplicity and an intuitive design. Review comments highlight how quickly staff can learn the system, with many praising its clean interface and straightforward workflows. New users often mention that onboarding is smoother, especially for small teams and independent hotels.
RMS’s more extensive feature set can lead to a steeper learning curve, and some users note that navigating the platform can be time-consuming. Support responsiveness and accessible learning resources are better in RoomRaccoon, helping hotels implement the system faster. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS offers a broader array of features—39 shared features plus 35 unique ones—covering trust accounting, guest CRM, multi-currency, booking engine, and more. Its features support complex operations like group bookings, digital registration, and housekeeper modules, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels.
RoomRaccoon, with only 12 unique features but 39 shared, focuses on core functionalities like booking management, channel connectivity, yield management, and automation. Its features are highly tailored for small hotels, including unlimited channels, drag-and-drop tapecharts, and advanced pricing tools.
In terms of feature depth, RMS provides more options but also demands more training. For straightforward, automated operations, RoomRaccoon’s streamlined features are sufficient. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support team is praised for proactive assistance and knowledgeable help, but reviews mention that response times can be delayed during peak periods. Support ratings (4.48/5) are strong, with users appreciating trust accounting help and technical guidance, though some desire additional digital learning resources.
RoomRaccoon’s support (4.53/5) is slightly higher, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and friendly service. Many users commend the onboarding process and ongoing help, noting that support often resolves issues swiftly. When support responsiveness tips the scale, RoomRaccoon has a slight edge.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS supports over 112 verified partners, including prominent integrations with Sage, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and STR. Its extensive integration network covers property management, channel management, payment systems, and more, providing flexibility for large or multi-property operations.
RoomRaccoon has 88 verified partners, with integrations including OTAs, payment gateways, and marketing tools like Bookboost and Customer Alliance. While slightly fewer, its integrations are well-suited for small hotels seeking reliable connections without complexity.
For broader connectivity, RMS’s larger partner network offers an advantage. Edge: RMS.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating (4.88/5) outperforms RMS (4.56/5), and recent reviews reinforce its popularity among small hotel owners. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and customer service, with testimonials highlighting how it saves time and boosts revenue.
RMS receives positive reviews, especially from larger properties or RV parks, but its ratings are slightly lower due to complexity and support response times. For user satisfaction, especially in small hotel segments, RoomRaccoon gets the higher scores.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RMS charges a base price of $800/month, with no trial, freemium, or tiered pricing. Its cost reflects its enterprise-level features and broad operational support.
RoomRaccoon’s base fee is $1,000/month, also without a trial. Its higher price accounts for its all-in-one package, dynamic pricing, and automation tailored for small operators. Both are flat monthly fees, but RMS’s broader feature set may justify its lower price for larger operations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff resources, or prefers simple, quick-to-implement solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel has complex multi-property management needs or requires advanced, customizable features.
RMS is a comprehensive, scalable platform with extensive features and integrations, ideal for larger or multi-property hotels. It excels in supporting complex operations, multi-currency, and automation but comes with a steeper learning curve and higher operational demands.
RoomRaccoon offers a simplified, user-friendly experience built around automation, integrated booking, and channel management. Its higher ratings and recent reviews reflect strong satisfaction among small-hotels and independents, making it the better choice if your hotel values ease and speed.
If your hotel needs a robust, customizable system to grow and support diverse operations, RMS is the clear winner. For smaller properties seeking efficiency with minimal fuss, RoomRaccoon is the definitive pick.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 35 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。RMS 提供 112 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RMS 的 HT Score 为 91,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问