The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #35 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 18 条评价 | #36 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 9 条评价 | #37 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 15 条评价 | #36 8 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 15 条评价 | #33 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #18 13 条评价 | #34 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #19 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 4 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | #14 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Roiback and STAAH aim to simplify reservations, reduce dependency on OTAs, and increase direct bookings, but they do so with different strengths. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, target market, and specific feature needs. Are you prioritizing a platform with extensive reviews and recent user feedback? Or focusing on advanced features and integrations?
Roiback, with a 43-review count and recent feedback, offers a more established presence in the industry. STAAH’s lighter review load but high recent ratings might suggest a newer or less widely adopted platform. Which qualities matter most for your hotel’s growth?
Roiback’s comprehensive review profile and an overall rating of 0/5 seem contradictory, but it’s important to note the 43 reviews mostly favorable, with recent feedback being more positive. Its strength lies in its deep feature set—14 exclusive features like loyalty program integration, Google Analytics tracking, and GDPR compliance—making it ideal for hotels seeking advanced customization and analytics.
STAAH’s rating of 4.81/5 based on 13 reviews, all recent, indicates a highly satisfied user base. It excels in ease of use, customer support, and affordability, making it suitable for properties that value straightforward operation and quick onboarding. Do you need a feature-rich engine or a user-friendly, support-backed solution?
If your hotel needs to optimize direct bookings while managing a range of marketing and analytics tools, go with Roiback. Its extensive feature list, including urgency messaging, booking abandonment recapture, and social media integrations, supports sophisticated marketing strategies. It’s well-suited for hotels that prioritize detailed reporting and multi-language support.
If simplicity and support matter more, opt for STAAH. Its ease of use, quick setup, and customer support ratings—both at 4.88/5—make it ideal for properties that want reliable booking management without extensive customization. Its focus on reducing OTA dependency through a commission-free model appeals to mid-sized hotels aiming for operational efficiency.
Roiback’s UI scores 4.49/5, while STAAH edges ahead at 4.69/5, based on recent reviews emphasizing ease of setup and daily operation. Users praise STAAH’s intuitive interface and friendly support team, which makes onboarding and staff adoption smoother. Roiback’s slightly lower ease-of-use score hints at more complexity, likely due to its broader feature set.
Edge: STAAH.
Roiback offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including GDPR compliance, social media bookings, Google Pay, and loyalty program integration—features that enhance marketing, security, and guest engagement. It also provides advanced promotional tools like urgency messaging and booking abandonment recapture.
STAAH provides 3 unique features—pooled inventory, automated reporting, and availability block—focused on operational efficiency and inventory management. Shared features total 22, but Roiback’s broader feature set makes it more suitable for hotels wanting extensive customization.
Edge: Roiback.
Both platforms receive high marks for support, with Roiback rated 4.72/5 and STAAH 4.88/5. Hotel reviews highlight Roiback’s personalized consulting and responsiveness, though some note room for speed improvements. STAAH’s customer service is consistently praised for quick, helpful responses, with reviewers calling their support team “amazing” and “professional.”
Edge: STAAH.
STAAH boasts 54 verified partners, more than double Roiback’s 27, including well-known integrations like BookLogic, GuestCentric, and RMS. Shared partners include TripAdvisor, Cendyn, and Siteminder, but STAAH’s broader third-party network offers more flexibility for varied hotel tech stacks.
Edge: STAAH.
STAAH’s recent reviews (all from the last 6 months) show a 4.81/5 rating, with hoteliers emphasizing ease of use, support, and reliability across different hotel types. Roiback’s reviews, mainly older, are more mixed, with a focus on feature depth rather than recent user satisfaction.
Considering the latest feedback, STAAH appears to have a more favorable perception among hoteliers today.
Edge: STAAH.
Roiback’s pricing starts at $500/month without a free trial, with no mention of tiered plans or discounts. STAAH’s pricing details are not publicly available, but its offerings suggest a flexible subscription model without implementation fees, making it potentially more accessible for smaller hotels.
Exact costs for STAAH may vary based on features and hotel size, so direct quotes are recommended.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward, easy-to-implement solution with minimal customization.
Not ideal if you require advanced marketing features like loyalty programs or detailed analytics.
Roiback focuses on providing a comprehensive platform that supports sophisticated marketing, analytics, and multi-channel management. Its extensive feature set makes it ideal for larger hotels or chains that want to maximize direct bookings through advanced tools.
STAAH, with a higher recent user satisfaction score, is better suited for hotels that prioritize ease of use, quick setup, and reliable support. Its broad integrations and simple interface make it a strong choice for properties looking to streamline operations and minimize OTA reliance.
If your hotel needs a deeply customizable and marketing-oriented booking engine, Roiback is the right choice. For straightforward, support-driven booking management that delivers high satisfaction, STAAH is preferable.
In conclusion, choose Roiback if your hotel requires extensive features and analytics, and opt for STAAH if you prioritize ease, support, and reliable integrations.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Roiback | Booking Engine 和 STAAH Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAAH Booking Engine 提供 54 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAAH Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Roiback | Booking Engine:否。STAAH Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ROIBACK 的 HT Score 为 72,STAAH 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问