The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 18 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 15 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 15 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #18 13 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #19 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 4 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #14 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Roiback’s Booking Engine and StayNow’s AI-Powered Trip Planning platform hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and strategic goals. Both aim to increase direct bookings, but Roiback offers a comprehensive, feature-rich solution with a strong global presence, while StayNow emphasizes AI-driven guest discovery tailored for independent hotels. Your decision should consider your hotel type, growth ambitions, and operational preferences.
Roiback’s long-standing reputation and extensive features make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven, scalable booking engine. StayNow, being newer and less reviewed, may appeal if you prioritize innovative AI tools and a lower price point. Will your hotel benefit more from a comprehensive platform or innovative guest targeting?
Roiback boasts a solid reputation with a 72.06/100 score, 43 reviews, and recent positive feedback, making it a trusted choice. StayNow, however, has no reviews or ratings yet, which makes its reliability and user satisfaction uncertain in comparison. Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings, but Roiback’s extensive feature set and proven track record position it as the more established solution.
Roiback excels in supporting hotels across multiple regions with integrations to main channel managers and PMS systems, whereas StayNow’s reach appears limited to North America without verified integrations. Are you looking for a platform with proven results and global support or an emerging AI-driven option with potential?
If your hotel needs a well-rounded, mature booking platform with advanced features and proven results, go with Roiback. It’s ideal for hotels that prioritize reliability, extensive integrations, and support across diverse regions, especially in Europe and Asia Pacific.
If your hotel is an independent or boutique property seeking innovative AI tools to attract high-quality guests and reduce OTA dependency, StayNow might seem attractive. However, with no reviews or proven track record, it’s less advisable unless you’re prepared for a newer, less tested platform.
For hotels looking for a dependable, scalable solution, Roiback’s comprehensive features and regional presence are the safer choice. Meanwhile, tech-savvy boutique hotels eager to experiment with AI-driven guest discovery may consider StayNow, but at the risk of limited support and unknown performance.
Roiback’s interface scores 4.49/5 for ease of use, with many users appreciating its intuitive booking flow and straightforward management tools. Its onboarding process, rated 4.34/5, highlights clear guidance and support, making staff adoption easier despite its complexity.
StayNow’s interface has no ratings or reviews, leaving uncertainty about usability. As a newer platform, it might have a simpler, modern design, but without user feedback, it’s hard to gauge how easily your team can adopt it.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, booking abandonment recapture, multi-lingual support, rate comparison widgets, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. These tools enable comprehensive control over the booking experience and marketing efforts.
StayNow, with no listed features beyond its core booking capabilities, lacks the extensive customization and marketing features that Roiback provides. If advanced features and integrations are crucial, Roiback’s richer set gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s customer support scores 4.72/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, expertise, and personalized consulting. Users report that support has been instrumental in achieving revenue growth and streamlining operations.
StayNow’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, which raises concerns about post-sale assistance. As a newer platform, it may lack the scale and experience of Roiback’s support team.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback integrates with 27 verified partners, including major channel managers and hotel tech solutions, ensuring a smooth connection with PMS and distribution systems. This extensive network enhances operational efficiency and channel management.
StayNow has no verified integrations, which could limit your hotel’s ability to connect with existing systems or expand distribution channels. If integration depth and breadth matter to your operations, Roiback’s ecosystem is a significant advantage.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, with a 90% likelihood to recommend and recent positive feedback from hotels of various sizes, particularly in the luxury, boutique, and city-center segments. Hotels appreciate the platform’s reliability, detailed analytics, and support.
StayNow has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without feedback, its suitability remains uncertain, especially when compared to Roiback’s established reputation.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no free trial or freemium option, reflecting its premium positioning. StayNow charges $100 per month, with no mention of a free trial, making it a more budget-friendly choice for smaller hotels.
While Roiback’s higher price may be justified by its extensive features and support, StayNow’s lower cost could appeal to budget-conscious properties if the platform proves reliable.
Not ideal if you are a small independent hotel with minimal technical needs or a tight budget, as Roiback’s cost might be a consideration.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive features, proven support, or regional coverage. Also less suitable if seamless integrations are crucial for your operations.
Roiback stands out as a well-established, feature-rich booking engine trusted by over 2,000 hotels worldwide. Its extensive integrations, regional support, and proven customer satisfaction make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels aiming to boost direct bookings sustainably.
StayNow, while promising with its AI-driven approach and lower price point, currently lacks reviews, proven performance, and integrations. It’s a potential pick for innovative boutique hotels willing to risk and experiment with emerging technology.
If your hotel values reliability, extensive features, and proven results, go with Roiback. If you’re an adventurous property with a focus on AI and a flexible budget, StayNow could be worth monitoring as it develops.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Roiback | Booking Engine 和 StayNow: AI-Powered Trip Planning & Hotel Booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Roiback | Booking Engine 和 StayNow: AI-Powered Trip Planning & Hotel Booking 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 StayNow: AI-Powered Trip Planning & Hotel Booking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Roiback | Booking Engine:否。StayNow: AI-Powered Trip Planning & Hotel Booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ROIBACK 的 HT Score 为 72,StayNow 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问