The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
thebuking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 18 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
thebuking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 15 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 15 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #18 13 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #19 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
thebuking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 4 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #14 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel hinges on multiple factors: functionality, ease of use, support, integrations, and overall value. While both Roiback and thebuking aim to boost direct bookings, Roiback's extensive features, stronger market presence, and more recent reviews position it as the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Thebuking, despite its AI-driven review insights, offers limited data, making it hard to evaluate its overall effectiveness.
In this comparison, we'll delve into their core differences, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which platform aligns best with your hotel’s goals. Ready to find the best fit for your team?
Roiback is a comprehensive booking engine with over 2,000 hotels worldwide, boasting a solid 72 HTR score, 43 reviews, and recent positive feedback. It emphasizes direct sales growth with features like multi-language support, flexible booking options, and integrations with over 27 partners, including major channel managers and PMS systems. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and measurable ROI.
Thebuking, on the other hand, primarily offers an AI review management platform with no publicly available reviews or ratings, making its market presence and user feedback difficult to assess. It focuses on review aggregation and actionable insights but lacks detailed feature sets or customer success stories. Given its minimal publicly available data, it’s hard to determine its suitability for hotels aiming for growth.
Do you want a proven, feature-rich booking engine with active support, or are you exploring AI review analysis with limited market validation?
If your hotel needs a full-featured booking engine designed to maximize direct bookings, streamline operations, and integrate with existing hotel tech, Roiback is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes looking for reliable performance, extensive features, and strong support — especially those in Europe, Asia Pacific, or North America.
If your primary focus is review aggregation, reputation management, or incorporating AI-driven customer feedback insights, thebuking could be relevant. However, without detailed feature info or proven hotel use cases, Roiback’s more comprehensive offering makes it the safer, more strategic investment for most hotels.
Are you looking to increase direct bookings and revenue or to analyze customer reviews more effectively? The answer will guide your choice.
Roiback’s user interface scores 4.49 out of 5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Support from the Roiback team is highly rated at 4.72 out of 5, and recent feedback confirms hoteliers find it easy to implement and adopt, with clear rate grids and flexible rate setup options.
Thebuking, lacking publicly available user reviews, offers no specific ratings or qualitative feedback. Without concrete usability data, it’s impossible to confidently assess its user-friendliness or onboarding process.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, multi-lingual support, booking abandonment recapture, multi-room bookings, rate comparison widgets, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. It also supports multiple payment gateways like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe, with detailed conversion rate reports.
thebuking provides no specific features or detailed descriptions. Its core offering appears to be review analysis, not a full booking engine, and thus it lacks the extensive functionalities available in Roiback.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s support scores 4.72 out of 5, with users citing quick responses, dedicated account managers, and personalized consulting as key strengths. Recent reviews highlight their proactive approach in helping hotels optimize their direct sales and resolve technical issues efficiently.
thebuking offers no publicly available reviews or customer support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback boasts 27 verified integrations with prominent channel managers, PMS, and hotel tech providers, including RoomRaccoon, GuestCentric, and Sojern. These partnerships enable seamless updates, synchronization, and enhanced operational efficiency. Many users praise the smooth connection with these systems, though some recommend ongoing improvements.
thebuking does not disclose any integration partnerships or compatibility with other hotel tech solutions, limiting its appeal for hotels seeking a fully integrated tech stack.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s overall score of 72.06 and 43 reviews in the last six months show consistent positive feedback, especially on ease of use and support. Hoteliers from boutique, city center, and resort segments have expressed satisfaction, with a 90% likelihood to recommend.
thebuking lacks any public reviews or ratings, so hotelier satisfaction levels cannot be gauged. Its limited visibility makes it impossible to determine whether it’s trusted or preferred.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s pricing starts at $500 a month, with no trial or implementation fees. Its pricing model is straightforward, and many users consider the value justified given its extensive features and support.
thebuking’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, suggesting a custom or undisclosed model. Without transparent pricing, budget evaluation and comparison are not feasible.
Given Roiback’s clear pricing and proven value, it remains the more attractive option financially.
Not ideal if you’re a small, independent hotel seeking only basic booking functionality without advanced features.
Not ideal if your goal is increasing direct bookings or integrating with a sophisticated hotel tech stack.
Roiback offers a full-featured, highly-rated booking engine with proven performance, extensive integrations, and dedicated support. It’s designed to help hotels increase direct bookings, optimize revenue, and operate efficiently across multiple regions.
If your hotel’s priority is conversion, ease of use, and reliable support, Roiback is the clear winner. Its recent reviews and high NPS indicate strong user confidence and satisfaction.
Thebuking, while potentially valuable for review analysis, lacks the market presence, detailed features, and user feedback necessary to recommend as a primary booking solution. Its focus on review insights could complement a booking engine but isn’t a substitute for a comprehensive platform.
In conclusion, unless your hotel specifically seeks review management without the need for a full booking engine, Roiback remains the more dependable and impactful choice for your team.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Roiback | Booking Engine 和 thebuking 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 thebuking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Roiback | Booking Engine:否。thebuking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ROIBACK 的 HT Score 为 72,thebuking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问