The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Winner Hotel Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 210 | 0 |
在分析了 210 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 客户成功与售后支持, 易用性和入门指南, 人工智能助手和聊天机器人自动化,而 Winner Hotel Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户成功与售后支持
▾
|
|
|
+
易用性和入门指南
▾
|
|
|
+
人工智能助手和聊天机器人自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
设置、集成和实施经验
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户成功与售后支持
▾
|
|
|
−
预订和房间分配工作流程
▾
|
|
|
−
渠道经理和分销
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #10 90 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 27 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 100 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 64 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 29 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 28 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 7 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 123 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #31 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #31 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for improving your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both RoomRaccoon and Winner PMS aim to streamline tasks, but they diverge significantly in terms of user feedback, features, and global reach. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a well-reviewed, all-in-one solution for small to mid-sized hotels or a system built for larger, more complex operations. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
RoomRaccoon, with over 169 reviews and a recent review count of five in the last six months, demonstrates more current user feedback, making it the more reliable choice today. Its overall rating of 4.88/5 and a high NPS score of 9.09/10 reflect strong user satisfaction, especially from independent and boutique hotels.
Winner PMS, despite being an established product with 400 employees, has no recent reviews or ratings to support current performance or user satisfaction. Its lack of publicly available recent feedback makes its effectiveness and usability less certain now.
Both systems aim to centralize operations—RoomRaccoon by integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, and automation into a single platform, while Winner PMS emphasizes streamlined hotel workflows and backend management. However, RoomRaccoon’s user reviews emphasize ease of use and automation, whereas Winner PMS’s lack of recent reviews leaves its current standing unclear.
Are you comfortable choosing a system based on its historical reputation without recent validation? Or do you prefer a modern, actively reviewed platform?
If your hotel is an independent boutique, small hotel, or vacation rental operator seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one platform that simplifies daily tasks and enhances revenue, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its highly-rated, intuitive interface supports automations for bookings, communication, and revenue management—ideal for smaller teams.
Conversely, if your hotel operates at a larger scale or requires complex integrations and advanced backend management, Winner PMS might seem appealing. Yet, the absence of recent reviews and performance data suggests it lacks the current validation needed for confident investment.
Given RoomRaccoon’s demonstrable user satisfaction and comprehensive feature set, it’s the clear choice for most small to mid-sized properties. Larger operations should scrutinize Winner PMS further but might need more advanced, modern tools.
RoomRaccoon boasts a user experience rated 4.74/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and ease of staff adoption. Many users mention how quickly their team learned the system and how it simplifies daily operations.
Winner PMS, with no recent ratings or user feedback available, leaves its ease of use uncertain. Its larger scale and complexity may introduce a steeper learning curve, especially without recent validation or user testimonials.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated payments, mobile app, CRM, guest profiles, and automation tools—many tailored to independent hotels and small chains. Notable features like automated night audits, multi-currency support, guest CRM, and real-time analytics provide a robust operational toolkit.
Winner PMS’s feature set is not publicly detailed, but it emphasizes core backend functions such as reservations, billing, and housekeeping management. Its lack of specific, differentiated features or recent updates, combined with no available feature count, suggests it may lack the breadth and modernity of RoomRaccoon.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support rating of 4.53/5, alongside recent reviews, highlights helpful, responsive customer service—hoteliers cite quick issue resolution and proactive communication. Many users remark that support staff are eager to assist, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother.
Winner PMS’s support quality is not documented through recent reviews, leaving its current customer service reputation unclear. Its larger size might imply more resources, but the absence of recent feedback limits confidence.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including popular hospitality tools like Sage, Becurious, Paxxio, and RevControl. Its extensive marketplace offers seamless connections with payment systems, CRS, marketing platforms, and more, reducing manual work.
Winner PMS has only one verified integration—Mews—and no publicly documented partner ecosystem. This indicates limited connectivity options and possibly more manual processes for your hotel.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s reviews are predominantly positive, with a 4.88/5 overall rating and a 94% likelihood to recommend among 169 reviews. Hotels of all sizes, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its user-friendliness, automation, and revenue features.
Winner PMS lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its credibility as a preferred solution today is unsupported by recent feedback.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon charges a fixed monthly fee of $1,000, with no freemium or trial options. Pricing includes a comprehensive set of features suitable for small to medium-sized hotels but may be costly for very small operations.
Pricing for Winner PMS is not publicly disclosed, which complicates direct comparison. Its opaque pricing model may lead to hidden costs or unmet expectations.
Larger hotels or hotel groups with complex operational needs and custom workflows.
Hotels seeking a highly customizable, enterprise-level management system.
Teams that prioritize backend processing over guest-facing features.
Hotels with existing infrastructure that requires seamless, deep system integrations.
Not ideal if you prefer modern, actively-reviewed solutions or need transparent, upfront pricing.
RoomRaccoon is a highly-rated, all-in-one PMS designed primarily for small to mid-sized hotels and independent operators. Its extensive feature set, ease of use, and positive, recent user reviews make it the safer, more validated choice today.
Winner PMS, despite its larger size and comprehensive offerings, lacks current user feedback to support its effectiveness. Its limited integrations and opaque pricing further diminish its appeal for today's hotel operators.
For most independent hoteliers and boutique properties, RoomRaccoon provides a proven, user-friendly platform that can significantly improve operations and revenue. Larger hotels with complex needs might consider Winner PMS, but should seek recent validation before committing.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,... 一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,工单无人解决,售后服务差强人意,这些都可能造成实际的运营和财务损失。
用户反复表示 RoomRaccoon 易于学习和操作,界面清晰明了,无需任何技术背景。培训视频和指导课程可帮助团队快速上手该平台,并轻松将其融入日常使用。
RoomRaccoon 的人工智能功能被认为前景可期,用户表示聊天机器人仍需训练才能更高效地完成日常操作任务。另一些用户则称赞人工智能助手是一项重要的辅助工具,表... RoomRaccoon 的人工智能功能被认为前景可期,用户表示聊天机器人仍需训练才能更高效地完成日常操作任务。另一些用户则称赞人工智能助手是一项重要的辅助工具,表明自动化正成为该产品价值的重要组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,... 一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,工单无人解决,售后服务差强人意,这些都可能造成实际的运营和财务损失。
一些评论者提到,在同一房型内管理预订存在局限性,尤其是在需要为客人更换房间时。这表明,对于入住率较高、入住模式更为复杂的酒店而言,需要更顺畅的房间分配... 一些评论者提到,在同一房型内管理预订存在局限性,尤其是在需要为客人更换房间时。这表明,对于入住率较高、入住模式更为复杂的酒店而言,需要更顺畅的房间分配流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RoomRaccoon PMS:否。Winner PMS (acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 77,Winner Hotel Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案