The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,456 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 用户界面和体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 1,456 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,247 | 209 |
在分析了 1,456 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and RoomRaccoon PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but Cloudbeds offers a broader, more integrated platform suited to larger or ambitious properties, while RoomRaccoon excels as a user-friendly, all-in-one solution for small to medium independent hotels. Your decision should align with your current needs and future plans.
Cloudbeds and RoomRaccoon address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, distribution, and guest communication—but diverge significantly in scalability, feature depth, and support. Cloudbeds’s extensive integrations and features set it apart for larger operations, whereas RoomRaccoon’s simplicity and ease of use make it perfect for smaller, independent hotels.
Are you looking for a comprehensive platform with room to grow, or a straightforward tool that gets the basics right? Let’s compare.
Cloudbeds is designed to serve a broad spectrum of hospitality businesses, from boutique hotels to large resorts, offering a deeply connected platform with over 190 verified partners. Its recent reviews show a high overall rating of 4.63 out of 5 from 1,071 reviews, with 81 reviews in the last six months, indicating current, relevant feedback. Customers praise its ability to unify operations, automate tasks, and improve revenue management.
RoomRaccoon, by contrast, caters primarily to small hotels and independent operators, boasting a smaller but highly positive review base of 169 reviews, with a near-perfect 4.88 rating. Its recent reviews are scarce but highly positive, emphasizing ease of use and automation. While both systems aim to simplify hotel management, Cloudbeds’s larger user base and recent feedback make it the more reliable choice for evolving properties seeking scale.
In summary, Cloudbeds’s widespread adoption and recent reviews provide more confidence for hotels planning to expand or needing extensive integrations. RoomRaccoon remains ideal for smaller hotels seeking simplicity and quick deployment.
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property management system with extensive third-party integrations, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s particularly suitable if your team aims to streamline complex operations, improve revenue management, and expand geographically, leveraging its 190 verified integrations and AI-powered signals.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, independent, or just starting to automate, RoomRaccoon offers a highly intuitive, all-in-one platform that simplifies reservations, guest communication, and invoicing. It excels in automating manual tasks and reducing operational chaos without overwhelming your staff or your budget.
For properties seeking robust features and future growth capacity, go with Cloudbeds. For those prioritizing ease of use and immediate operational efficiency, RoomRaccoon is preferable.
Cloudbeds scores 4.61 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews noting its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding. However, some users mention a learning curve during initial setup, especially when integrating complex systems. Its mobile app is functional but could benefit from further feature development, particularly for on-the-go management.
RoomRaccoon outperforms slightly on usability, with a 4.74 rating, and many users describe it as extremely intuitive, especially for small teams or first-time PMS users. Its simplified workflow and automation features make daily operations smoother, and onboarding is often completed within days.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Cloudbeds offers 64 features, including unique capabilities like channel self-mapping, native email marketing, centralized messaging, digital registration, and guest SMS communication. It also boasts modules for spa, wellness, and a comprehensive rule-based room assignment system, making it highly customizable for complex properties.
RoomRaccoon provides 46 features, with key strengths in guest profiles, multi-currency support, yield management, bulk updates, and derived rates. Its features focus on automation, online check-in, and simplified reservation workflows, designed for quick management rather than extensive customization.
The significant difference: Cloudbeds’s 18 unique features surpass RoomRaccoon’s 5, offering more advanced and specialized tools for larger or multi-property hotels.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores 4.41 out of 5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness, especially during onboarding. Users commend its proactive help, though some note delays during peak periods or when resolving complex integrations.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores slightly higher at 4.53, with reviews highlighting its friendly, knowledgeable staff and swift issue resolution. Many users appreciate the direct communication and tailored assistance, especially for smaller-scale needs.
While both are strong, Cloudbeds’s larger customer base and recent review volume give it a slight edge, but RoomRaccoon’s personalized support is highly valued for small hotel teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Cloudbeds shines with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and specialized integrations like WebRezPro, Umi Digital, and Net Affinity. Its extensive marketplace allows properties to connect with numerous tools, from revenue management to marketing.
RoomRaccoon offers 88 verified partners, with notable integrations including Wubook, Sage, and several marketing and payment systems. It has fewer third-party options, which may limit scalability for larger operations.
Given the larger ecosystem, Cloudbeds provides superior flexibility and scalability, especially for multi-property or multi-region hotels.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63 from 1,071 reviews positions it as a recognized leader, especially among boutique and larger hotels. Hotels in segments like boutique and city center properties praise its comprehensive features and integration capabilities.
RoomRaccoon, with a 4.88/5 rating from 169 reviews, is preferred by small, independent hotels for its simplicity, speed, and automation. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of deployment and support for fast operational improvements.
For broader, more recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds’s larger review count and recent reviews make it the stronger recommendation, especially for hotels with growth plans.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s base price is $600/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade scope. Additional costs may arise from optional modules and integrations.
RoomRaccoon’s starting price is $1,000/month, also without a free trial, but its more limited feature set for smaller hotels often justifies the cost. Its pricing structure is straightforward but may be less flexible for larger portfolios.
If budget is critical, RoomRaccoon offers a more transparent, predictable cost for small properties, while Cloudbeds’s higher price reflects its broader capabilities.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform with extensive integrations, advanced features, and a strong track record of supporting ambitious hotels. Its large review base and recent positive feedback confirm its suitability for properties with growth ambitions and complex operational demands.
RoomRaccoon provides a highly intuitive, cost-effective solution for small hotels and independents wanting to automate workflows quickly and efficiently. Its user-friendly design, automation, and support make it ideal for properties that prioritize simplicity and fast deployment.
Choose Cloudbeds if your hotel has plans to expand, needs detailed customization, and can invest in a broader system. Opt for RoomRaccoon if your property values ease of use, quick results, and a focused, all-in-one solution tailored for small operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 46 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 通道自映射 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问