项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 1,447 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易用性和入门, 日历和可视化预订管理, 报告与分析,而 SIHOT 用户则强调 advanced support and training, 快速解决问题, 集成和自定义界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和入门
▾
|
+
Advanced Support and Training
▾
|
|
+
日历和可视化预订管理
▾
|
+
快速解决问题
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
集成和自定义界面
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理与OTA同步
▾
|
+
灵活性和适应性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和人工服务
▾
|
−
用户界面和现代化
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
−
财务报告和定制
▾
|
|
−
账单、账务和发票工作流程
▾
|
−
详细的报告和分析
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 694 条评价 | #39 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 222 条评价 | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 48 条评价 | #17 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #15 3 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 562 条评价 | #34 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 242 条评价 | #31 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 126 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 100 条评价 | #21 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 468 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 175 条评价 | #17 33 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 340 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, improves revenue, and enhances guest satisfaction. Cloudbeds PMS and SIHOT both address these core challenges but diverge in approach, features, and market presence. Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with a strong reputation among hoteliers for its ease of use and recent customer feedback, whereas SIHOT provides a modular, highly customizable system favored by larger, multi-property operators. Which aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products aim to centralize hotel management tasks, but Cloudbeds emphasizes simplicity and integrated growth tools, while SIHOT delivers flexibility and tailored solutions. Do you prioritize quick implementation and user-friendly design, or do you need a highly adaptable system with extensive customization options?
Cloudbeds and SIHOT both seek to streamline hotel operations, but Cloudbeds shines with its comprehensive ecosystem that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, and guest communication in one platform. It’s particularly suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels that need an intuitive, easy-to-deploy solution.
SIHOT, on the other hand, targets larger hotels and chains with complex needs, offering a modular structure that allows businesses to pick specific functionalities. If your hotel values quick onboarding, a modern interface, and seamless integrations, Cloudbeds leads the pack. Conversely, if your hotel requires deep customization, multi-property management, and flexible deployment options, SIHOT provides a robust alternative. Which product's approach matches your operational complexity?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-adopt, all-in-one platform that reduces manual work and accelerates growth, go with Cloudbeds. Its recent review count of over 1,000 and 81 reviews in the last 6 months demonstrate active user engagement and ongoing improvements, especially in ease of use, onboarding, and customer support.
If your hotel operates across multiple locations, has complex workflows, or requires a tailored system with flexible deployment options, SIHOT is the better fit. Its smaller review count (39 reviews) indicates less recent data, but it remains a trusted choice for multi-property management and detailed customization.
For hotels prioritizing rapid deployment, user-friendly design, and a proven track record, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice today. If adaptability and modularity are your main concerns, SIHOT’s flexible architecture might serve you better.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple reservation workflows, and straightforward onboarding process. Users frequently mention that staff can quickly become proficient, reducing training time and operational disruptions.
SIHOT holds a slightly lower ease-of-use rating at 4.49/5, with some users noting that its interface, while flexible, appears less modern and more complex initially. Its modular design offers extensive features but can require more dedicated training to maximize its potential.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 features exclusive to its platform, including real-time inventory management, native email marketing, centralized messaging, and a guest app—features not available in SIHOT. It also boasts 47 shared features like multi-channel distribution, analytics dashboards, and rules-based room assignments.
SIHOT’s unique feature set is minimal, with only one feature exclusive to its platform—on-premise deployment—highlighting its focus on flexibility over feature breadth. Its core strengths lie in multi-property support, flexible deployment options, and detailed reporting, but it lacks the extensive integrated tools found in Cloudbeds.
Overall, Cloudbeds provides a richer feature set out of the box, making it more suitable for properties seeking an all-in-one system. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a support rating of 4.41/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive onboarding. Recent reviews cite quick support responses and empathy, although some users mention occasional challenges with system speed during peak hours.
SIHOT scores slightly higher at 4.62/5, with comments highlighting its competent, friendly local support and effective issue resolution. However, given the limited recent reviews (all from a small sample), Cloudbeds’ larger and more recent review base suggests more active support engagement.
Edge: SIHOT.
Cloudbeds features connections with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue tools, and access providers, with 25 shared integrations with SIHOT. Its extensive marketplace supports broad automation and third-party app integration, making it highly adaptable.
SIHOT offers 60 verified partners, with a focus on custom interfaces and integration support. It supports active development of integrations, especially for complex enterprise environments, but its ecosystem is smaller and less diverse.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating is 4.63/5 based on 1,071 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, mobile access, and growth-driving features. Hoteliers in boutique, hostel, and independent segments particularly praise its simplicity and operational efficiency.
SIHOT’s rating is 4.77/5, but with far fewer recent reviews (all from 39 reviews, none in the last 6 months), its higher score may reflect satisfaction among larger, multi-property clients. It’s favored by hotel chains needing extensive customization, though some mention the interface feels dated.
Edge: Cloudbeds, due to its more recent and larger review base.
Cloudbeds charges a monthly base fee of $600, with no free tier or trial reported publicly. Pricing is transparent but might increase with add-ons or integrations.
SIHOT’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; it offers flexible deployment options—Cloud, SaaS, On-premise, Off-premise—tailored to your hotel’s needs. Cost details typically depend on configuration and scale, and you’ll need to contact SIHOT for a quote.
Not ideal if you need deep customization, complex multi-property workflows, or specific on-premise deployment.
Not ideal if your property prefers a simple, out-of-the-box solution or if quick setup is a priority.
Cloudbeds offers a highly accessible, all-in-one platform with a proven track record of supporting independent and boutique hotels. Its recent reviews, large user base, and extensive feature set make it a clear leader for properties seeking ease of use and growth tools.
SIHOT provides a more customizable, modular system suited for larger, multi-property operators with complex needs and a focus on flexible deployment. Its support and multi-property features are strong, but it lacks the recent review volume to demonstrate current user satisfaction at the same scale.
If your hotel values simplicity, rapid implementation, and comprehensive integrations, go with Cloudbeds. If your operation demands flexible customization and multi-property support, SIHOT could be the better choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或... 一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或不完整,尤其是在初始实施阶段。
用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度... 用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度,并帮助员工一目了然地了解酒店情况。
用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现... 用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现代的仪表盘式可视化,而不是类似Excel的导出格式。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望... 支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望针对紧急的前台问题能提供电话、视频或直接代理支持。
一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知... 一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知,而无需切换回网页浏览器或电子邮件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for n... Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for new employees. Regular CRM calls are also appreciated for keeping open lines of communication.
SIHOT 因其快速有效的问题解决能力而受到称赞。然而,一些评论批评其最初不愿承担某些问题的责任,强调沟通方面有待改进。
SIHOT 积极支持并参与自定义界面的创建,显著简化了与其他系统的集成。这确保了无缝运营,并增强了现代酒店业务所需的灵活性。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
有人呼吁对 SIHOT 的用户界面进行更现代化和直观的更新,用户指出,与市场上的其他解决方案相比,当前的系统设计感觉过时了。
虽然此功能很有用,但一些用户希望财务报告定制能够更快地适应,以更好地满足特定区域的财务需求。这些反馈表明,定制功能需要增强。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 SIHOT 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 206 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SIHOT 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。SIHOT:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,SIHOT 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐