The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 413 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SIHOT 表现出色 在 advanced support and training 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and On premise.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Real Time Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 413 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 42 | 371 |
在分析了 413 条经验证的评价后,SIHOT 用户最看重其 advanced support and training, 快速解决问题, 集成和自定义界面,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Advanced Support and Training
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
快速解决问题
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
集成和自定义界面
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
灵活性和适应性
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面和现代化
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
财务报告和定制
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
详细的报告和分析
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #40 9 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 21 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #30 1 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #35 15 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #30 11 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 13 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #28 5 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #17 31 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #25 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between SIHOT by GUBSE AG and Stayntouch by Stayntouch involves evaluating core functionalities, ease of use, support, integrations, and the specific needs of your hotel. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Understanding their unique strengths and weaknesses will help you select the best fit for your property.
SIHOT offers extensive modular hotel management features with deep customization, especially suited for properties seeking a highly flexible system. Stayntouch emphasizes user-friendly cloud-based design with a focus on mobile capabilities, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing ease of use and guest interaction. Are you prepared to trade some depth of features for simplicity?
Both SIHOT and Stayntouch address hotel management needs, but their underlying approach diverges. SIHOT, founded in 1986 in Germany, provides a broad, highly customizable platform that supports complex multi-property management and detailed reporting, often favored by larger and more traditional hotels. Conversely, Stayntouch, founded in 2012 in the United States, emphasizes intuitive cloud deployment and mobile features, catering well to modern hotels focused on guest engagement and remote operations.
In recent reviews, Stayntouch has garnered significantly more attention, with 317 reviews compared to SIHOT's 39, and more recent feedback (26 reviews in last six months vs none for SIHOT). This makes Stayntouch’s data more indicative of current performance and user satisfaction. Their respective ratings also reflect this, with Stayntouch scoring 91.01 overall versus SIHOT’s 73.52. Given these stats, is your hotel better served by a well-established, customizable platform or a modern, highly-rated user experience?
If your hotel needs a cloud-native, mobile-focused PMS that simplifies daily operations, go with Stayntouch. Its intuitive interface, extensive third-party integrations, and high user ratings make it ideal for fast-paced hotels seeking scalability and guest-centric features. For hotels that value deep customization, multi-property management, and advanced reporting, SIHOT’s modular approach and extensive regional presence in Europe and Asia make it the better option.
Large hotel chains or properties with complex needs should lean toward SIHOT’s robust functionalities and flexible deployment options. Smaller, tech-forward hotels or those prioritizing guest experience and remote management should choose Stayntouch for its ease of use and modern design.
Stayntouch’s interface is consistently rated higher (4.7/5) than SIHOT’s (4.49/5), reflecting its focus on simplicity and mobile accessibility. Users praise Stayntouch for its intuitive screens, quick onboarding, and seamless daily operation, with one reviewer noting, “Training was very efficient, and the system is very friendly for operators.” Conversely, SIHOT’s UI, while flexible, is sometimes criticized for feeling dated and less intuitive, especially for new staff.
Onboarding experiences reflect this trend: SIHOT scores 4.73/5, slightly above Stayntouch’s 4.58/5, thanks to its comprehensive support. However, the ease of daily use favors Stayntouch, making it the better choice for hotels seeking quick staff adoption and less training hassle. Edge: Stayntouch.
SIHOT offers 48 features, including guest CRM, gift vouchers, and employee messaging, which Stayntouch lacks. Its strengths lie in multi-property management, EPoS integration, and extensive customization options, particularly suited for hotels with complex operational needs.
Stayntouch, with 42 shared features and 7 unique ones, excels in guest messaging, real-time reporting, automated assignments, and contactless check-in—features that enhance guest engagement and operational agility. Its integrations with platforms like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH at no extra cost make it highly adaptable.
Overall, SIHOT’s specialized features cater to hotels requiring deep operational control, while Stayntouch’s focus on ease and guest interaction makes it ideal for modern, mobile-oriented properties. Edge: SIHOT.
Stayntouch’s support ratings (4.68/5) slightly surpass SIHOT’s (4.62/5), with reviews emphasizing the quality of onboarding, training, and responsiveness. Customers highlight the effective, supportive training team and minimal downtime, describing support as “consistent, friendly, and helpful.”
SIHOT also garners praise for its support, particularly its online support academy and CRM calls, but some reviews mention initial reluctance to take responsibility. For hotels valuing quick, comprehensive assistance, Stayntouch’s slightly higher ratings and recent positive reviews give it the edge.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, significantly more than SIHOT’s 60, with shared partners including Cendyn and Upsellguru. Its open API approach and extensive third-party connections facilitate comprehensive solutions for hotels wanting flexibility and scalability.
SIHOT excels in supporting custom interfaces and active integration with regional vendors, especially across Europe and Asia. However, for broader connectivity and future-proofing, Stayntouch’s extensive partner network provides more options. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s overall rating (4.56/5) surpasses SIHOT’s (4.77/5), but recent reviews tell a different story. Stayntouch’s 26 reviews in the last six months reinforce its high satisfaction, especially among mid-sized and boutique hotels, with many praising its user-friendly design.
SIHOT’s reviews, mainly from longer-term users, highlight its robustness and customization. Given the recent surge in positive feedback and higher overall rating, Stayntouch’s current performance makes it the more highly-rated platform overall. Edge: Stayntouch.
SIHOT does not publicly list pricing, which suggests it may offer custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, often with higher implementation costs. Stayntouch charges a flat $800 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
This simplicity makes Stayntouch more accessible for hotels with limited budgets or those seeking straightforward pricing. SIHOT’s pricing might be better suited for larger properties with complex needs willing to invest in extensive customization and support.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, mobile-focused platform or minimal IT support.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep customization, complex billing, or operates in regions where SIHOT’s regional support is stronger.
The core difference lies in approach: SIHOT offers a highly flexible, feature-rich platform tailored for complex, multi-property management, whereas Stayntouch delivers an intuitive, cloud-based, guest-friendly system that excels in mobile operations.
If your hotel needs granular control, extensive customization, and operates across regions like Europe or Asia, SIHOT’s depth and regional support make it the better choice. For hotels valuing ease, speed, and guest engagement, Stayntouch’s high user ratings and recent reviews position it as the superior option.
For large, complex properties with resource capacity, SIHOT’s customization and multi-property features are unmatched. But if your focus is on modern guest experiences, quick implementation, and scalable cloud management, you’ll find Stayntouch more aligned with your goals.
In conclusion, the decision hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity versus your desire for a smooth, mobile-centric experience. Both platforms are capable, but your specific priorities will determine the best fit.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SIHOT 和 Stayntouch 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 1 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for n... Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for new employees. Regular CRM calls are also appreciated for keeping open lines of communication.
SIHOT 因其快速有效的问题解决能力而受到称赞。然而,一些评论批评其最初不愿承担某些问题的责任,强调沟通方面有待改进。
SIHOT 积极支持并参与自定义界面的创建,显著简化了与其他系统的集成。这确保了无缝运营,并增强了现代酒店业务所需的灵活性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
有人呼吁对 SIHOT 的用户界面进行更现代化和直观的更新,用户指出,与市场上的其他解决方案相比,当前的系统设计感觉过时了。
虽然此功能很有用,但一些用户希望财务报告定制能够更快地适应,以更好地满足特定区域的财务需求。这些反馈表明,定制功能需要增强。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。SIHOT 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。SIHOT 提供 60 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SIHOT:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SIHOT 的 HT Score 为 73,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问