The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 91 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 11 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 50 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 30 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 20 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 45 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Goki by Goki and STAYmyway by Staymyway involves weighing two key factors: proven performance and recent user feedback. Goki has established itself with a significant number of reviews, high ratings, and recent positive feedback, making it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking a trusted, mature system. STAYmyway, with no reviews and limited market presence, remains less proven in real-world hotel environments. Your decision should hinge on the data-backed performance that best fits your needs.
Both products aim to provide keyless entry solutions that enhance guest convenience and streamline operations. While Goki integrates hardware and software in a comprehensive way, STAYmyway primarily transforms smartphones into digital keys, often working in parallel with existing lock systems. Do you prioritize proven track records or innovative flexibility?
Goki is well-established with over 150 reviews, a 4.2/5 overall rating, and a high NPS score of 9.5/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its reliability and ease of use. STAYmyway, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings, making its performance and hotel satisfaction less certain. Goki’s broader integration options, including hardware upgrades and SDKs, provide a more robust solution for diverse hotel types. Conversely, STAYmyway’s cloud-based, app-centric approach offers a flexible, smartphone-first experience but without proven hotel-specific feedback.
Goki’s extensive global presence across 16 countries and proven success stories suggest it is a mature product with tangible operational benefits. STAYmyway’s limited regional footprint and absence of reviews mean you lack concrete data on its real-world performance. Is your hotel looking for a trusted, validated system or willing to experiment with a less proven solution?
If your hotel needs a high-trust, hardware-integrated access control system with proven performance, go with Goki. Its significant review volume and recent positive feedback from diverse hotel segments, especially hostels, highlight its reliability and ease of deployment. If, however, your hotel is seeking a flexible, app-based solution that can work with existing locks and prioritize guest smartphone engagement, STAYmyway might appeal—though its lack of reviews raises questions about its effectiveness at scale.
For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, cost savings, and proven guest satisfaction, Goki’s comprehensive system is the safer bet. Meanwhile, if your hotel values ease of implementation with minimal hardware changes and is ready to take a chance on innovation, STAYmyway’s approach offers potential, but with uncertain results.
Goki’s user ratings reflect an ease of use at 4.79/5, with most recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and minimal staff training. Its well-documented API and support resources further simplify staff adoption, which is evidenced by high support ratings of 4.75/5. Reviewers mention that Goki’s system is straightforward for both staff and guests, with many noting that it reduces check-in times and operational headaches.
STAYmyway, lacking user reviews altogether, offers no publicly available insights into its ease of use. Its app-based approach relies heavily on guest device compatibility and assumes familiarity with Bluetooth or RFID technology. Without real-world hotel feedback, it’s impossible to gauge whether your team and guests will find STAYmyway equally intuitive.
Edge: Goki.
Goki boasts 8 shared features with STAYmyway, including core access management, integration capabilities, and contactless entry, plus 4 features unique to Goki such as a developer SDK, door lock upgrade kits, and Apple Watch app support. It also offers extensive integration with 20 verified partners, including property management systems like WebRezPro and Cloudbeds, and additional hardware options.
STAYmyway provides keyless entry, cloud management, and compatibility with existing locks via Bluetooth or RFID, but only has 3 unique features and 7 verified partners, mostly limited to North American markets. While STAYmyway’s key advantage is its flexibility with existing hardware, Goki’s broader feature set and integrations give it a more complete, hotel-ready package.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s customer support ratings are impressive, with a 4.75/5 rating and reviews praising its quick, responsive service and knowledgeable onboarding. Users highlight how Goki’s support team helps solve issues swiftly, ensuring minimal disruptions, especially during implementation.
Staymyway’s support reputation is unknown due to no reviews, leaving uncertainty around its responsiveness or quality. Without customer feedback, you cannot reliably assess whether STAYmyway offers the same level of service.
Edge: Goki.
Goki integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and booking platforms, and offers an SDK for custom integrations—making it adaptable for hotels with complex operational needs. It covers a wide range of property types across multiple regions, ensuring compatibility for diverse markets.
Staymyway connects with 7 verified partners, primarily North American hotel systems, and offers straightforward integration options. While its focus on Bluetooth and RFID compatibility is a strength, its limited partner network restricts flexibility compared to Goki’s broader ecosystem.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s 4.2/5 rating, based on 155 reviews, reflects solid satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially hostels and boutique hotels. Recent reviews consistently praise its stability, ease of use, and customer service.
STAYmyway has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. The absence of feedback suggests it has not yet been adopted or tested extensively in real hotel environments.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s pricing starts at a $400 base fee, with no mention of monthly fees, freemium plans, or implementation costs, indicating transparent, straightforward pricing. Staymyway does not provide specific pricing details, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs.
Goki’s clear pricing structure allows hotels to budget confidently, while STAYmyway’s lack of pricing transparency requires direct inquiry and potential negotiation, which could complicate budgeting.
Goki is a mature, highly-rated access control system with proven performance, extensive integrations, and a broad global footprint. Its combination of hardware and software solutions makes it reliable for hotels seeking operational efficiency and security.
If your hotel values a validated, feature-rich system backed by positive reviews and established support, Goki is the clear choice. It is particularly suitable for properties that want to reduce costs, streamline guest check-ins, and ensure seamless operation.
STAYmyway offers a flexible, smartphone-focused approach that can work well for small properties or boutique hotels with existing lock infrastructure. However, lacking reviews and proven track record, it remains a less certain option for hotels prioritizing reliability and support.
If your hotel is open to innovative, app-driven access and you’re comfortable with less proven solutions, STAYmyway could fit. Otherwise, Goki stands out as the more dependable, well-supported choice based on current data.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Goki 和 STAYmyway 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goki 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAYmyway 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Goki 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goki:否。STAYmyway:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Goki 的 HT Score 为 100,Staymyway 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问