The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 56 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Xn protel Systems 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 56 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 56 | 0 |
在分析了 56 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 个性化的客户成功支持, 用户友好界面, 与第三方系统集成,而 Xn protel Systems 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
个性化的客户成功支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
|
+
人工智能驱动的预订引擎
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
广泛的报告选项
▾
|
|
|
−
基于云的系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 28 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #5 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 34 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 25 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 18 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #7 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 34 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 18 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #7 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) by SHR Group and XMS Enterprise CRS by Xn protel Systems hinges on your hotel's specific needs. Both products aim to streamline reservation management and improve distribution efficiency. However, SHR CRS is a widely adopted and highly rated solution with a robust feature set and recent positive reviews, making it the clear leader for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
If your hotel is considering a comprehensive platform with extensive integrations and a strong global presence, SHR CRS is likely your best fit. Conversely, XMS Enterprise CRS offers a centralized reservation approach but lacks recent reviews or detailed performance data, which weakens its case.
Are you ready to see which solution aligns better with your operational priorities?
Both SHR CRS and XMS CRS are designed to centralize booking and distribution, but their market presence and review data tell a different story. SHR CRS has a 4.77/5 overall rating based on 49 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, whereas XMS CRS has no ratings or reviews available.
SHR Group’s solution is used globally across multiple regions, with a focus on high-rated hotel segments like independent, boutique, and casino properties. XMS, however, provides limited publicly available data, making it harder to gauge its suitability.
If your hotel values a product backed by extensive user feedback and proven results, SHR CRS is the superior choice. Would you prefer a solution with a track record of customer satisfaction or one with scarce publicly available performance data?
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and smooth operations. SHR CRS scores a 4.61/5 for onboarding and a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Reviewers note that SHR’s system is “pretty easy to use” and “more user-friendly than competitors like iHotelier,” despite some feedback about menu navigation needing improvement.
XMS CRS, however, offers no publicly available ratings or user reviews, making it impossible to assess its user interface or onboarding experience. Without recent feedback, it's difficult to determine if it matches SHR’s ease of use.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS boasts 20 distinct features, including guest profiles, booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, multi-property management, and revenue management controls — all designed to optimize your reservation process. These features are exclusive to SHR, giving your team more tools to control distribution, pricing, and customer data.
In contrast, XMS CRS lacks publicly listed features or detailed specifications, making it hard to compare. Its feature set remains unclear, but the absence of detailed features or recent reviews suggests SHR’s offering is more comprehensive.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
Customer support ratings reveal SHR CRS’s strength: with a 4.76/5 score, users praise its “top-notch support” and “prompt response times.” Reviewers highlight SHR’s dedicated, personable service, which significantly eases daily operations.
XMS CRS provides no publicly shared support reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate their support quality. The lack of recent reviews or user feedback diminishes confidence in their support effectiveness.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS integrates with 81 verified partners, including major players like Profitroom, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and IDeaS, offering a broad ecosystem for your hotel. It also connects seamlessly with PMS, RMS, CRM, and payments, ensuring smooth data flow across your tech stack.
XMS CRS has only 26 verified integrations, with some notable partners like SEVENROOMS and Canary Technologies, but fewer overall. The broader network of integrations makes SHR more adaptable to your existing systems.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS’s reviews consistently rate it highly, with an overall 4.77/5 rating from 49 reviews, most within the last six months. Hoteliers like Sundial Resorts highlight “spectacular growth” after implementing SHR, emphasizing its distribution and revenue management capabilities.
XMS CRS has no publicly available reviews, making it impossible to determine how well hoteliers rate it. With no recent feedback, SHR remains the clear frontrunner for user satisfaction.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
Pricing information for both products is not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise solutions. Usually, these systems are customized based on hotel size and needs, so direct inquiries are necessary to determine exact costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value of proven performance and support, which SHR offers based on reviews and features.
Hotels that should consider SHR CRS:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that might consider XMS CRS:
Not ideal if:
SHR CRS stands out as the more reliable, well-rated option based on recent reviews, with 49 recent feedback entries and a 4.77/5 score. Its extensive feature set, global presence, and high customer satisfaction make it suitable for most mid to large hotels seeking a comprehensive reservation platform.
XMS CRS, however, provides a centralized booking approach but lacks recent reviews, detailed features, or clear support data. Without proven recent customer feedback, its value remains uncertain.
If you want a tested, well-supported solution with a strong user base, SHR CRS is the clear choice. Choose XMS only if your hotel already uses their ecosystem or if specific features align with your unique needs, and you are comfortable with less available feedback.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 和 XMS Enterprise CRS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
SHR 的客户成功团队经常被称赞为杰出,提供主动和定制的支持。这种级别的服务有助于处理日常咨询和重大项目,大大简化了酒店运营的管理。
SHR 的系统(尤其是 CRS 和 CRO)经常被描述为用户友好且易于操作。这种易用性有助于提高运营效率并加快新用户的入门速度。
无缝集成第三方系统(如 PMS 和其他酒店管理工具)是 SHR 的一大优势。用户认为这对于顺畅运营和高效管理至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,SHR 系统需要提供更广泛、更方便用户使用的报告选项。这包括临时分析功能和对关键指标的更详细洞察。
一些用户表示希望获得更全面的基于云的体验,以最大限度地减少升级期间的停机时间。这将使 SHR 符合现代技术趋势并提高系统可用性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 和 XMS Enterprise CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 XMS Enterprise CRS 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Central Reservation System (CRS):否。XMS Enterprise CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 49,Xn protel Systems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问