The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Zaplox 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 29 | 3 |
在分析了 32 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 宾客旅程应用程序, 自动化与集成, 非接触式办理登机手续,而 Zaplox 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客旅程应用程序
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与集成
▾
|
|
|
+
非接触式办理登机手续
▾
|
|
|
+
设计灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收入机会
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知延迟
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 10 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #15 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | #12 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #17 1 条评价 | #11 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #11 1 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating two contactless check-in solutions: LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) and Zaplox Self-service Kiosk. Both aim to streamline operations, reduce staff workload, and improve guest experience, but they do so through different approaches. LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive platform with guest journey management and automation, while Zaplox provides a straightforward, hardware-agnostic self-service kiosk. Which solution aligns better with your property’s needs and strategic goals?
LIKE MAGIC and Zaplox both address the need for contactless check-in, but they do so in distinct ways. LIKE MAGIC’s platform integrates guest management, automation, and upselling, offering a broad feature set and a high level of customization. Zaplox, by contrast, focuses on self-service kiosks that can be deployed with minimal hardware, emphasizing quick implementation and guest convenience. Do you prefer a full-suite guest journey platform or a simple, hardware-compatible kiosk system?
LIKE MAGIC holds a higher review count (29 reviews versus 3 for Zaplox) and has more recent feedback, making its data more reliable. While LIKE MAGIC’s overall rating is 0/5, this appears to be a reporting anomaly, but its high scores in ease of use, support, and value for money (all above 4.8/5) suggest strong user satisfaction. Zaplox’s 4/5 rating is based on fewer reviews, which are older, reducing confidence in its current performance. Would you prioritize a platform with more recent, comprehensive feedback?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated guest management system that handles check-in, digital keys, upselling, messaging, and analytics, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. It is best suited for properties aiming to streamline operations across multiple touchpoints, especially if you already have integrations with property systems like PMS or digital locks.
If your hotel simply requires a reliable, hardware-agnostic self-service kiosk to reduce front desk workload and enable 24/7 check-in and check-out, Zaplox is more appropriate. It appeals to properties with limited IT resources seeking an easy-to-deploy, straightforward solution without extensive customization needs.
For hotels with high guest volume, a desire for automation, and a need for detailed analytics, LIKE MAGIC’s broader feature set and recent review momentum make it the better fit. Conversely, properties prioritizing quick deployment, hardware flexibility, and minimal integration complexity may prefer Zaplox.
LIKE MAGIC’s user ratings in ease of use stand at 4.9/5, reflecting an intuitive interface praised by users for its straightforward guest experience and onboarding process. The platform’s self-service guest journey app is designed for simplicity, with most users reporting minimal training requirements and high satisfaction with the streamline of guest interactions.
Zaplox, with a 4.17/5 rating for ease of use, is also regarded as stable and simple, especially given its web-based, hardware-independent deployment. However, some users report issues with lengthy onboarding processes due to frequent developer changes and slower updates, which can hamper staff adoption.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC offers 10 exclusive features, including hotel website check-in portals, custom questions, document & passport scanning, ID verification, and pre-arrival upselling, directly enhancing guest engagement and operational efficiency. Zaplox, with 18 features, includes mobile apps, notifications, remote check-in, guest messaging, room service ordering, and integration with PMS and lock systems, providing a more extensive feature set.
While Zaplox's feature count is higher, many are standard, and LIKE MAGIC’s unique features focus on guest engagement, personalization, and revenue opportunities. If your focus is on a comprehensive guest journey, LIKE MAGIC's tailored features may be more valuable.
Edge: Zaplox (more features, but less targeted for guest experience).
LIKE MAGIC’s support and onboarding scores stand at 4.83/5 and 4.78/5 respectively, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful communication and smooth onboarding. Users appreciate the platform’s responsiveness, with some noting that support is a key reason they choose the platform.
Zaplox’s ratings are lower, with support at 3/5 and onboarding at 2.75/5. Some users report delays and challenges due to developer turnover, which affects their confidence in ongoing support and updates.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, focusing on core hotel management and payment solutions. Zaplox boasts 17 integrations, including major PMS and lock brands like Stayntouch, protel, dormakaba, and Vingcard, offering broader compatibility with existing hotel infrastructure.
If your hotel relies heavily on specific integrations, Zaplox’s larger partner network could be advantageous. However, LIKE MAGIC’s targeted integrations support streamlined hotel operations.
Edge: Zaplox.
LIKE MAGIC, with its 29 reviews and recent feedback, has a high likelihood to recommend score of 99% and ranks favorably across segments, especially in city center hotels and branded properties. Users frequently mention its ability to reduce staffing and improve guest experience, with reviews highlighting operational efficiency.
Zaplox’s 3 reviews, mostly older and from hostel and budget hotels, suggest moderate satisfaction at best. The limited recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current performance, but overall ratings are decent.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC’s pricing is set at a $700 base fee, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs, indicating a straightforward pricing model. Zaplox’s pricing details are unavailable, but typically, hardware-based kiosks involve hardware costs and potentially annual licensing fees.
For budget-conscious properties, LIKE MAGIC’s transparent pricing may be more appealing, but the total cost depends on implementation and scale. Zaplox's costs could vary widely depending on hardware needs and integration complexity.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple kiosk solution without needing extensive guest engagement features or customization options.
Not ideal if your hotel needs integrated guest journey features, detailed analytics, or extensive customization.
LIKE MAGIC’s core advantage lies in its comprehensive guest management and automation capabilities, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency and enhanced guest experiences. Its high review scores and recent feedback reinforce its reliability, especially for properties that want to personalize guest interactions and boost revenues through upselling.
Zaplox offers a straightforward, hardware-compatible kiosk solution suited for properties that need quick deployment and minimal integration fuss. While it has a broader feature set, its older reviews and lower support ratings suggest it may not provide the same level of ongoing service or innovation.
If your hotel values a unified guest journey platform with recent, positive reviews, go with LIKE MAGIC. If you prefer a simple, hardware-flexible self-service kiosk for basic check-in/out, Zaplox could meet your needs.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Zaplox Self-service Kiosk 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 手机值机 | ||
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 通知 | ||
| 酒店网站入住门户 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 16 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了... 宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了宾客体验。
用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验... 用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验。
LikeMagic 的非接触式入住服务备受赞誉,提升了宾客的便利性,并减少了前台的拥挤。宾客可以通过手机办理入住,流程快捷卫生,尤其受到国际旅客的青睐。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
LikeMagic 以通过客房升级和套餐附加服务等功能提升增值收入而闻名。该平台整合了延迟退房或客房送餐等附加服务,为提升收入提供了宝贵的机会。
人们经常提到需要更全面的分析和报告功能。用户表示希望拥有能够追踪宾客参与度并提供关键绩效指标的高级模块,从而更好地做出决策并改进服务。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Zaplox Self-service Kiosk 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Self-service Kiosk 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LIKE MAGIC (Check-in):否。Zaplox Self-service Kiosk:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 74,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问