The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
1,414件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Cloudbedsのユーザーはintuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel managementを最も評価し、Sliqueのユーザーはを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
通貨換算および金融業務
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル機能
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のホテル管理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #2 675件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #1 235件のレビュー | — |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #1 51件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | #4 5件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #1 546件のレビュー | — |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #3 245件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #2 145件のレビュー | — |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #2 96件のレビュー | — |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | #2 532件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #4 166件のレビュー | — |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | #3 201件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 ▾ | #3 13件のレビュー | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds and sliQue GRM by Slique ultimately hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds addresses the core challenges of hotel management—reservation, distribution, and guest experience—within a unified platform, whereas sliQue's DataBarn centers on data-driven insights and automation tailored more toward real estate and property management sectors. How do these different focuses align with your hotel's goals?
If your team seeks an established, feature-rich management system with widespread industry adoption, Cloudbeds is the more proven choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, automation-driven platform with advanced analytics, sliQue could appeal—though its hotel-specific capabilities are less mature.
Cloudbeds is designed specifically for hotels, offering a broad suite of functionalities like reservation management, channel distribution, guest communication, and revenue tools. sliQue’s DataBarn platform is more generalized, integrating robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily suited for real estate or property portfolios—not specifically tailored for hotel operations.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—over 85 unique functionalities—supports daily hotel tasks, while sliQue’s focus on automation and analytics, despite its impressive technological scope, lacks dedicated hotel modules. Would your hotel benefit more from an all-in-one PMS built for hospitality or from a flexible, tech-centric platform with a broader industrial focus?
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with over 1,200 reviews and recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Users frequently mention how even less tech-savvy team members find it accessible, and onboarding averages 4.41/5—indicative of a smooth setup.
sliQue’s DataBarn, however, is a complex platform designed for technical teams managing multiple systems and devices. With only five employees, sliQue’s interface appears less tailored for front-line hotel staff, and its usability for non-technical users remains untested in the hospitality space. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers an expansive feature library—85 exclusive hotel features like PMS connectivity, inventory management, multi-currency, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging. It also supports unlimited channels and custom rates, making daily operations more efficient.
sliQue’s DataBarn provides advanced IoT integration, real-time data analytics, and automation capabilities, but these are not hotel-specific and lack the breadth of features necessary for hotel management. For hotel-focused functionalities, Cloudbeds’s dedicated modules clearly outperform sliQue’s industrial tech. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews praising its quick, friendly, and professional service. Users appreciate the responsive support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many citing timely responses and ongoing assistance.
sliQue, with a tiny team of five, offers limited support infrastructure—no publicly available review data or customer testimonials highlight its support quality in the hotel context. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive user base and recent reviews, its support system is more reliable and proven. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has established partnerships with over 190 verified technology providers, including major OTAs, POS systems, and revenue management tools, enabling seamless data synchronization. It supports integrations like HotelTime, Sirvoy, HiJiffy, and even Oracle Hospitality, covering most hotel needs.
sliQue’s DataBarn offers IoT and automation integrations, but with only one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—its ecosystem is limited. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network is far superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from over 1,200 users, demonstrates broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Users emphasize its ease of use, reliable support, and effect on revenue growth.
sliQue’s ratings are unavailable due to lack of hotel-specific reviews, making it difficult to evaluate hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s reputation among hoteliers remains unmatched. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s baseline pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade nature. sliQue’s DataBarn does not publicly list pricing, but given its industrial focus, costs are likely customized based on system complexity and integrations.
Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing allows for better budgeting, while sliQue’s custom quotes require direct contact. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s predictable fee structure offers clearer value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on custom automation or IoT device integration outside hospitality, as Cloudbeds primarily focuses on hotel management features rather than industrial automation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated PMS, reservation engine, or direct guest communication tools—sliQue’s platform is better suited to industrial or property management sectors outside hospitality.
Cloudbeds and sliQue serve fundamentally different needs. Cloudbeds is a proven, hotel-specific platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your property. sliQue’s DataBarn offers powerful automation and analytics, but more suited for industrial applications and real estate management.
If your hotel needs an integrated, easy-to-use management system with proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking advanced automation and data insights—particularly in non-hospitality sectors—sliQue may be more suitable, albeit with less hotel-specific functionality.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform built for hotels, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Opt for sliQue if your property management is heavily automation-driven and your team has the technical capacity to implement a broader industrial tech stack.
In conclusion, for the average hotelier, Cloudbeds’s current review count, recent feedback, and comprehensive hotel focus make it the more dependable and scalable choice.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
通貨換算の精度、特に複数通貨取引における精度について懸念が指摘されています。ユーザーからは、照合プロセスに影響を与える差異が報告されています。通貨換算... 通貨換算の精度、特に複数通貨取引における精度について懸念が指摘されています。ユーザーからは、照合プロセスに影響を与える差異が報告されています。通貨換算の設定を改善することで、財務管理を簡素化できる可能性があります。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Cloudbeds HMSとsliQue GRMは多くの主要なHotel Management Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Cloudbeds HMSは189件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、sliQue GRMは1件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Cloudbeds HMSは使いやすさで4.6/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Cloudbeds HMS:いいえ。sliQue GRM:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのHotel Management Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。CloudbedsのHT Scoreは100、Sliqueは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー