The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #26 28件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) | #46 4件のレビュー | — |
| 大規模(75〜199室) | #32 2件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | #31 1件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #31 16件のレビュー | — |
| ラグジュアリー | #44 4件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン | #43 4件のレビュー | — |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #32 5件のレビュー | — |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | #25 8件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #20 25件のレビュー | — |
| アジア太平洋 | #16 4件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 | #11 2件のレビュー | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hogatex PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more extensive feature set make it the more complete solution. Hogatex, with no current reviews or ratings, offers a broader but less proven platform. Which system will truly elevate your hotel’s operations?
Counter’s comprehensive, user-rated platform offers a proven track record, whereas Hogatex remains untested in recent deployments. Are you prioritizing reliability and community feedback or exploring new options?
Counter excels in supporting hostel operations with an intuitive interface, automation features, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for budget accommodations and hostels. Hogatex claims to be a full-scale PMS but has no recent reviews or user feedback to verify its effectiveness.
Counter’s 54 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong user confidence, especially in ease of use and support. Hogatex’s absence of recent reviews suggests it’s either less adopted or less active in customer engagement, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 and customer support 4.96/5, praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hogatex’s lack of publicly available ratings means you have no recent data on user satisfaction, support quality, or ease of onboarding.
Counter features 19 distinct functionalities, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and automated night audits. Hogatex’s feature set remains undefined, with no publicly listed capabilities, making Counter’s offering the more transparent and proven choice.
Support-wise, Counter’s support team is highly rated, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hogatex’s support details and customer feedback are unavailable, indicating uncertainty in service quality.
Counter’s integrations include seven verified partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds—covering key channels and payment solutions. Hogatex has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for now.
Hoteliers rate Counter highly across segments, especially in hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hogatex’s lack of reviews prevents any assessment of user satisfaction, making Counter the safer bet for assured positive feedback.
Pricing details for Counter are unavailable, but its no-cost model for core features, plus optional paid integrations, suggests flexibility. Hogatex’s pricing remains undisclosed, which complicates direct cost comparisons.
Counter is ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, city-center properties, and independent inns—particularly those needing a straightforward, feature-rich system that supports mobile management. Not recommended if your property requires extensive automation or a broader property type beyond hostels.
Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger or needs a full PMS, but the absence of reviews makes this uncertain. It’s not ideal if you prioritize proven customer support, recent user feedback, or robust integrations.
Counter vs Hogatex: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter’s large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its reliability and effectiveness in hostel management and small hotel operations. Hogatex, with no recent reviews or community feedback, remains an untested option in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use PMS with built-in automation, integrations, and strong support, go with Counter. Its extensive features and positive user feedback make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Choose Hogatex if you are exploring new vendors and are willing to accept the risk of limited real-world validation. Its lack of recent reviews and unknown support quality make it a less certain investment.
In conclusion, Counter clearly stands out as the more dependable, reviewed, and feature-rich choice, especially for hostels and small hotels. Hogatex’s potential is unverified, and without recent customer insights, it’s harder to recommend confidently.
Counter by Counter offers a feature-rich, user-rated platform with recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels looking for proven operational tools. Hogatex PMS, with no recent feedback or ratings, remains an untested option that lacks demonstrated support and integrations.
Counter’s strong community feedback, multiple integrations, and ease of use make it the top choice. Hogatex’s lack of recent customer reviews and unknown capabilities place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking reliable, current solutions.
Counter’s intuitive interface simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and reporting, helping your team manage operations efficiently with minimal training. Its automation features—like automatic night audits and integrated POS—reduce manual work, freeing staff to focus on guest interactions.
Hogatex claims to streamline reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but provides no recent user feedback to confirm these efficiencies. Without current reviews, it’s unclear if Hogatex reduces workload or improves guest satisfaction like Counter does.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage the property from anywhere, offering flexibility that’s especially valuable for small or busy hotels. Hogatex’s platform lacks publicly available usability data, making it uncertain whether it can deliver similar operational gains.
Support at Counter is highly rated, with quick responses and proactive problem-solving. Hogatex provides no recent support reviews, so your team might face challenges in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Counter’s integrations with key partners like SiteMinder and Stripe facilitate daily operations by consolidating bookings and payments. Hogatex’s integrations are nonexistent in available data, limiting its immediate usefulness for integrated workflows.
Overall, if your staff values ease of use, automation, and reliable support, Counter will likely improve your daily operations. Hogatex’s untested platform leaves its impact on daily management uncertain.
Counter’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their quick, friendly assistance. Testimonials highlight staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts who resolve issues promptly, boosting team confidence.
Hogatex offers no recent review data on support quality. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether their support team is responsive or provides effective onboarding, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, and its user interface is praised for being clean and intuitive. Hogatex’s onboarding process and usability remain unverified due to lack of recent reviews.
Support features like 24/7 online assistance and dedicated account help set Counter apart. Without recent Hogatex customer feedback, its support quality remains unknown, posing a potential risk for new users.
In terms of staff adoption, Counter’s straightforward interface and positive onboarding ratings lead to faster staff training and higher user satisfaction. Hogatex’s unreviewed support and usability leave its ease of adoption in question.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features are well-documented, with many praised for their practicality and ease of use.
Hogatex’s feature set remains undisclosed, and no recent reviews or detailed descriptions are available. Without verified features, it’s impossible to compare comprehensively, but Counter’s transparent feature list makes it a safer, more predictable choice.
Counter’s integrated POS and revenue tracking modules support a broader range of operational needs. Hogatex, lacking public feature details, does not currently demonstrate the same level of functional depth.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s customer support is rated 4.96/5, with users consistently praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Positive reviews cite quick solutions to issues and proactive communication, especially during onboarding.
Hogatex offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality and responsiveness unverified. Without community feedback, your hotel risks uncertain assistance, which can be critical during system issues or training.
Counter’s support team is known for addressing bugs swiftly and providing ongoing assistance, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Hogatex’s lack of recent support reviews and data makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s service needs.
Support quality is crucial for smooth daily operations; with Counter’s proven record, your team will likely experience fewer disruptions. Hogatex’s support remains an unknown factor, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for streamlined bookings, payments, and access control, making daily operations smoother.
Hogatex currently has no verified integrations publicly listed. This limits its connectivity to essential third-party tools, potentially requiring manual processes that counteract efficiency.
Counter’s open partner ecosystem helps expand your hotel’s market reach and operational flexibility. Hogatex’s limited connectivity reduces its appeal for properties relying on multiple channels or payment providers.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s user base, primarily hostels and small hotels, rates it at 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Hogatex lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its absence from community feedback implies it’s less proven or less adopted in today’s hotel market.
Counter’s recent feedback confirms its strengths in usability, support, and feature set, especially for budget and hostel accommodations. Hogatex’s unverified reputation means it cannot be confidently recommended based on current user experiences.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but its free core features and optional paid services suggest a flexible, scalable approach for small to medium-sized properties.
Hogatex does not list any pricing information, leaving hoteliers to guess about costs or negotiate directly. The absence of transparent pricing may complicate budgeting decisions.
Counter’s lack of upfront costs and modular pricing make it suitable for properties seeking predictable investments. Hogatex’s undisclosed fees mean you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or lack of affordability.
Counter is best for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation without complex customization needs. It’s not suited for larger, enterprise-level hotels seeking highly tailored systems.
Hogatex might fit larger-scale operations, but the current lack of community feedback makes it a risky choice for hoteliers requiring proven support and functionality.
Counter’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for small hotels and hostels. Its broad feature set, integrations, and support infrastructure directly address the needs of properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Hogatex, without recent reviews or community feedback, remains an unverified contender. Its unknown support quality and features make it a risky option, especially when reliable service and proven results are critical.
If you need a trustworthy, well-supported platform with proven results, Counter is the clear winner. Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger, but it’s advisable to wait for more validation before choosing it.
Counter’s community-backed success and recent positive reviews give you confidence that it will meet your property’s operational needs. Its strong ecosystem of integrations and support makes it the safer, more strategic investment for your team.
Hogatex remains an unconfirmed candidate, with no recent user feedback to validate its claims. For now, Counter’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores make it the preferred option for hoteliers looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest experiences.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision toward a system that’s not only feature-rich but also trusted by your peers. Prioritize proven support, community reviews, and real-world functionality — Counter currently leads in all these areas.
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
ホテル経営者は、Counter のインターフェースがわかりやすく、直感的で、ユーザーフレンドリーであるため、新しいスタッフを素早くトレーニングできると感じてい... ホテル経営者は、Counter のインターフェースがわかりやすく、直感的で、ユーザーフレンドリーであるため、新しいスタッフを素早くトレーニングできると感じています。モバイルとデスクトップのインターフェースはうまく機能し、マネージャーはリモートでタスクを処理できます。特に、カレンダーとカレンダー管理のシンプルさが評価されています。
Counter のサポート チームは、その応答性と有用性で頻繁に賞賛されています。Evelyn や Max などのスタッフは、そのプロ意識が特に高く評価されています。ただ... Counter のサポート チームは、その応答性と有用性で頻繁に賞賛されています。Evelyn や Max などのスタッフは、そのプロ意識が特に高く評価されています。ただし、特定のタイム ゾーンではサポートが遅くなるという懸念があります。
ユーザーは、非接触型チェックイン、クレジットカード請求の自動化、プラットフォーム間での予約管理などのタスクを含む Counter の自動化機能を高く評価してい... ユーザーは、非接触型チェックイン、クレジットカード請求の自動化、プラットフォーム間での予約管理などのタスクを含む Counter の自動化機能を高く評価しています。この自動化により、スタッフの作業負荷が軽減され、運用効率が向上します。
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
多くのホテル経営者は、オーバーブッキング、ベッドの空き状況の表示、予約キャンセル時のシステムエラーなど、システム内のバグが頻繁に発生すると述べています... 多くのホテル経営者は、オーバーブッキング、ベッドの空き状況の表示、予約キャンセル時のシステムエラーなど、システム内のバグが頻繁に発生すると述べています。これらのバグは、日々の業務やゲストの体験に悪影響を及ぼします。
ホテル経営者は Counter のレポート機能を高く評価していますが、レポートを改善してよりよい洞察を得ることができると指摘しています。特に複数の料金プランで... ホテル経営者は Counter のレポート機能を高く評価していますが、レポートを改善してよりよい洞察を得ることができると指摘しています。特に複数の料金プランで運営している企業や動的価格設定を使用している企業では、収益管理機能が不足していると考えられています。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。CounterとHogatex PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Counterは7件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Hogatex PMSは0件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Counterは使いやすさで4.6/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Counter:いいえ。Hogatex PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。CounterのHT Scoreは17、Hogatexは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー