Counter vs. Hop PMS:
あなたに最適なのはどちら？

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hop PMS by Hop Software hinges on your property’s unique needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter’s focus is sharply tuned to hostels and budget accommodations, while Hop PMS offers a broader suite suitable for various hotel types. Your decision should reflect your operational complexity, feature needs, and regional presence.

Counter is a proven choice for hostel operators, boasting a higher review volume and more recent customer feedback. Hop PMS, despite its broad feature set, has yet to garner recent reviews, making Counter the more reliable gauge of current performance. Which features and support align best with your property goals?

Is Counter or Hop PMS Better for Hotels?

Counter, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, emphasizes ease of use, support, and value. Hop PMS, with no recent reviews and a score of zero, cannot currently provide comparable validation or recent user insights. Both systems aim to simplify operations, but Counter’s dedicated hostel focus and extensive reviews make it the more dependable choice today.

Counter excels in its intuitive interface, mobile-friendly design, and rapid onboarding, particularly for hostel environments. Hop PMS's broader focus and extensive feature list—such as revenue management and a guest app—are not validated by recent user feedback, leaving their real-world performance uncertain. Are you seeking proven usability or a wide feature set without recent validation?

Counter vs Hop PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates primarily as a hostel or budget accommodation, go with Counter. Its strong user ratings, dedicated hostel features, and ease of use make it a reliable choice for small to medium hostel properties. Conversely, if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, integrated guest communication, and a more comprehensive suite, Hop PMS’s extensive feature list suits larger, more complex operations—though recent reviews are lacking.

For properties prioritizing simplicity, rapid onboarding, and proven support, Counter’s 4.7/5 onboarding and 4.96/5 support ratings tip the scale. If your focus is on expanding direct bookings and reducing costs, Hop’s promise of an integrated, commission-free booking engine might appeal—yet, the absence of current user feedback limits confidence. Which approach aligns with your operational complexity and growth plans?

Is Counter or Hop PMS Easier to Use?

Counter’s interface scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, supported by user reviews praising its simplicity, quick learning curve, and mobile-friendly design. Hoteliers highlight how new staff can be trained rapidly with Counter, and its intuitive calendar management simplifies daily tasks. Customer support is also highly rated, with a 4.96/5 score and comments about fast, helpful assistance.

In contrast, Hop PMS lacks recent reviews or detailed user feedback, preventing a clear comparison. Its extensive feature list could imply a steeper learning curve, especially since no recent user ratings are available. The current lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to evaluate usability definitively. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Hop PMS?

Counter offers 18 shared features and one exclusive feature: multi-lingual support, which enhances its usability for international hostel markets. Hop PMS boasts 13 unique features, including revenue management, EPoS, guest communication via SMS, online check-in, and a guest app—features absent in Counter.

While Hop’s advanced features cater to larger, more complex hotels, Counter’s core strengths lie in its simplicity and essential integrations like POS and channel management. Counter’s focus on core hostel needs and ease of use make it more straightforward, but Hop may be better suited for hotels seeking a broader feature set. Edge: Counter (for simplicity and core features).

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Hop PMS?

Counter’s customer support scores a remarkable 4.96/5, with reviews praising the responsiveness and professionalism of support staff like Evelyn and Max. Users often mention how support helps resolve issues quickly, which is crucial in daily operations.

Hop PMS currently has no recent reviews or publicly available customer support ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given the critical role support plays in PMS success, Counter’s well-documented high support ratings make it the safer choice. Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Hop PMS?

Both Counter and Hop PMS have verified integrations with 7 partners, including common partners like WuBook and SiteMinder. Counter’s additional integrations include FLYR, Cloudbeds, Channex, Goki, and Stripe—expanding its connectivity options.

Hop PMS also connects with some of the same platforms but has unique integrations like GuestRevu, Aven Hospitality, Onity, Userguest, and RoomPriceGenie. While both systems offer similar core integrations, Counter’s broader regional market presence and more recent reviews suggest a more mature ecosystem. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Hop PMS?

Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 is based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback confirming high satisfaction, especially among hostel operators. Hoteliers emphasize its ease of use, support, and value.

Hop PMS’s rating is currently unavailable, making direct comparison impossible. The absence of recent reviews on Hop limits confidence in its current performance and user satisfaction levels. Therefore, based on recent, validated feedback, Counter is clearly the higher-rated option. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Hop PMS Cost?

Counter does not publicly disclose its pricing structure, suggesting it may be customized or tailored to client needs, but it is offered without implementation fees or freemium options. Hop PMS similarly does not list specific prices, indicating potential custom quotes.

Both products seem to focus on transparency about features rather than pricing, which might require direct inquiry. Without concrete numbers, your hotel should request a quote based on your property size and feature needs to accurately compare costs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

• Hotels that primarily operate as hostels, budget accommodations, or small inns.
• Teams seeking an easy-to-learn, mobile-friendly PMS with quick onboarding.
• Properties that value high support quality and ongoing improvements.
• Hotels that need core features like reservation management, POS integration, and channel management.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive revenue management, dynamic pricing, or a guest app, as Counter’s features are more simplified and focused on hostel operations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Hop PMS?

• Hotels looking for an all-in-one system with integrated revenue management, guest communication, and online check-in.
• Properties that want to reduce expenses with a cloud-based, commission-free booking engine.
• Larger hotels or resorts seeking a broad feature set for complex operations.
• Hotels that prioritize extensive integrations and automation tools.

Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily as a hostel or small inn, or if recent user feedback on support and usability is a priority, as Hop PMS lacks recent reviews.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter’s clear advantage is its proven performance and strong recent review volume, especially among hostel operators. Its focus on simplicity, support, and core PMS features makes it ideal for small to medium hostels seeking reliability.

If your property needs a straightforward, support-driven PMS with proven usability, go with Counter. Its high user satisfaction and recent validation make it the safer choice today.

However, if your hotel requires a broader feature set—including revenue management, guest communication, and online check-in—and you operate at a larger scale, Hop PMS might be worth exploring once recent reviews become available to validate performance.

In summary, for most hotels, especially those in the hostel or budget sector, Counter remains the more dependable, well-supported, and highly-rated option. For larger, more complex operations, careful consideration of Hop’s features, once supported by recent feedback, may be warranted.