Counter vs. Maxial:
あなたに最適なのはどちら？

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Maxial by Maxial hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and focus. Counter is tailored for hostels, boasting a robust feature set specifically designed for smaller properties with high volume, while Maxial offers an all-in-one management suite suited for larger hotels and resorts. Both aim to streamline operations but diverge significantly in their capabilities and target markets.

Counter, with more recent reviews and a higher review count, presents a clearer picture of its ongoing performance. Maxial’s lack of reviews and recent feedback makes it difficult to gauge its current reliability or user satisfaction. So, which product better meets your hotel’s needs?

Is Counter or Maxial Better for Hotels?

Counter excels at providing a user-friendly, mobile-optimized PMS designed for hostels, with 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Its focus on ease of use, automation, and integrations makes daily management straightforward. Maxial, on the other hand, offers a broad management platform but has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its performance and user experience unverified.

Counter's high customer support score of 4.96/5 and ease of use rating of 4.6/5 demonstrate its reliability for busy hostel environments. Maxial’s lack of recent data leaves hoteliers uncertain about its current support quality or usability. Do you want a proven system with recent user feedback or an untested option?

Counter vs Maxial: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your property is a hostel, boutique, or small city hotel needing quick, intuitive management with integrated booking, Counter is the logical choice. Its strong user feedback, especially from hostels, emphasizes its simplicity, automation, and support. Maxial might appeal if you run a larger resort or hotel chain seeking extensive module integration, though its lack of recent reviews makes this speculative.

Counter’s 7 verified partners and active presence in multiple regions indicate a mature, tested product. Maxial’s absence of verified integrations and reviews suggests it’s less proven for hotel operations at this time. For hoteliers prioritizing confidence and proven features, Counter is the safer bet.

Is Counter or Maxial Easier to Use?

Counter’s UI is praised for being straightforward, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating backed by 54 recent reviews. Users highlight its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile-friendly design, making staff adoption quick. Support responsiveness is also a standout strength.

Maxial offers no recent reviews or ratings, so its usability cannot be reliably assessed. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether Maxial provides a user-friendly experience or requires significant training. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Maxial?

Counter boasts 19 exclusive features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automation tools, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. These functionalities address core hostel needs like online booking, automated night audits, and group management.

Maxial’s feature set remains unspecified, with no data on unique capabilities or modules. Its lack of verified integrations or detailed feature count suggests it may not offer the same level of specialization or breadth as Counter. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Maxial?

Counter’s support score of 4.96/5 derives from enthusiastic user reviews praising its quick, helpful responses — especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate its responsiveness, even amidst system bugs, and consider support a key strength.

Maxial has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Hoteliers need confidence in post-sale assistance, and without recent feedback, Counter clearly leads here. Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Maxial?

Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations facilitate payment, channel management, and access control, helping streamline your operations.

Maxial has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or unproven connectivity with third-party platforms. For a property relying on multi-channel distribution or integrated payment solutions, Counter’s existing integrations provide a tangible advantage. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Maxial?

Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 and 54 recent reviews provide a strong, recent indication of user satisfaction. Hospitality properties across various segments, especially hostels, rate it highly for ease of use and support, with some reviews calling it “the best PMS for hostels.”

Maxial’s lack of reviews and ratings mean there’s no recent data to gauge user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Until user feedback emerges, Counter’s ratings and reviews make it the more trustworthy choice. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Maxial Cost?

Both Counter and Maxial do not publicly list pricing details, suggesting a custom quote process based on your property’s size and needs. Given the absence of transparent pricing, your team should request tailored quotes to compare value accurately.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

• Hotels that operate hostels, bed & breakfasts, inns, boutique hotels, or city center properties.
• Teams seeking an easy-to-use, mobile-accessible PMS that simplifies daily management.
• Properties focused on automation, guest engagement, and integrations with industry platforms.
• Small to medium-sized properties needing quick onboarding and reliable support.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive enterprise-level modules not offered in Counter, or if your property’s scale exceeds its current feature scope.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Maxial?

• Larger hotels, resorts, or chains that need an integrated management system covering reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing.
• Teams interested in utilizing AI-driven insights for reviews and operational recommendations.
• Properties seeking a unified platform to handle multiple modules without integrating third-party solutions.
• Hotels aiming for a scalable, comprehensive system with broad operational tools.

Not ideal if your hotel is a small property or if you prefer a solution with proven user feedback and recent reviews.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter is a highly-rated, feature-rich PMS tailored for hostels and small properties, with a clear track record of recent user satisfaction. Its ease of use, automation, and support offerings make it a solid choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and reliability.

Maxial’s lack of recent reviews and unclear feature scope make it an uncertain option. Unless your hotel operates at a larger scale and can verify Maxial’s capabilities, Counter remains the recommended choice.

If you need a system that’s proven, easy to implement, and well-supported, Counter should be your first pick. For larger properties with complex operational needs and a desire for AI-driven insights, keep an eye on Maxial’s future reviews and feature updates.