The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のホテル管理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) | #31 3件のレビュー | #37 3件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) | #43 0件のレビュー | #30 3件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | #25 0件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック | #31 2件のレビュー | #42 0件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー | #31 2件のレビュー | #33 2件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン | #39 0件のレビュー | #28 2件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 | #31 0件のレビュー | #22 2件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #33 0件のレビュー | #31 0件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #10 23件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 | #10 3件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 | #16 0件のレビュー | — |
Choosing between DJUBO and Visitor hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently—DJUBO consolidates an extensive suite of features into one platform, while Visitor emphasizes simplicity with core functionalities. Your decision should factor in your hotel size, segment, and whether you need advanced integrations or straightforward operation. Are you ready to dive into the finer details to see which suits your team best?
DJUBO, with its 19 recent reviews and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5, stands out as the more proven and comprehensive option. Visitor, while also highly rated and praised in customer support, has fewer recent reviews (22 total, no reviews in the last six months) and lacks the same level of feature breadth. For most hoteliers looking for a robust, all-in-one platform, DJUBO offers a more reliable choice backed by more recent user feedback.
DJUBO and Visitor both target hotel management, tackling reservation, channel distribution, and guest engagement, but they diverge sharply in scope and complexity. DJUBO integrates a PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office tools, creating a unified environment for larger or multi-property hotels. Visitor focuses on essential functions like bookings, channel management, and guest communication, suitable for smaller or boutique properties.
The main difference is the level of feature depth: DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, such as group booking, automated night audits, and digital registration, designed for scalability. Visitor’s 7 unique features include website development, guest CRM, and online checkout, emphasizing ease of use and quick deployment. Do you need a full-stack management system or a straightforward, guest-centric tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management solution capable of handling multi-channel distribution, detailed revenue analysis, and operational automation, DJUBO is the clear winner. Its broad feature set and integrations support complex workflows for independent hotels and groups alike.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick setup, and core functionalities such as online bookings and guest management without extensive customization, Visitor fits better. It’s especially ideal for properties like bed & breakfasts, hostels, or budget hotels that value straightforward operations and strong customer service.
Hoteliers with a focus on growth, automation, and detailed reporting should lean toward DJUBO, while those seeking an easy-to-deploy, user-friendly platform for basic needs should opt for Visitor. Which profile aligns with your hotel’s current and future needs?
DJUBO scores a high 4.95/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and supportive onboarding process. Its comprehensive dashboard consolidates multiple functions, which might initially seem overwhelming but is designed for straightforward navigation once familiar.
Visitor slightly edges out with a 4.91/5 rating, praised for its simplicity, fast setup, and accessible online platform. Customers highlight how intuitive the booking and channel management features are, making onboarding smoother for small teams.
Edge: DJUBO, thanks to its highly rated user experience combined with extensive feature depth, particularly for larger hotels or groups requiring more complex management.
DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including group booking engine, automated night audits, guest communication via SMS, digital registration, and integrated CRS. It supports real-time status updates, task management, and ancillary revenue tracking—capabilities that cater to complex, multi-layered hotel operations.
Visitor comes with 7 unique features, such as website development, guest CRM, online checkout, and GDPR compliance, focusing on core operations. While its features cover essential booking and communication needs, it lacks the automation and advanced modules DJUBO provides.
For hotels requiring extensive automation, detailed revenue management, and operational control, DJUBO’s feature set is superior. If your needs are basic, Visitor’s streamlined features may suffice.
Edge: DJUBO, with 20 exclusive features that support scalable, multifaceted hotel management.
DJUBO’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews highlighting its supportive staff and quick issue resolution. Customers mention ongoing upgrades and a responsive onboarding experience, reinforcing confidence in their support system.
Visitor’s reviews, though limited, give it a perfect 5/5 score, with feedback emphasizing friendly, helpful customer service and quick problem-solving. However, the smaller review base means less data to assess consistency.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its larger review count and more recent feedback indicating strong support for hotel teams at all levels.
DJUBO connects with three verified partners, including Tripadvisor, Simplotel, and its own booking platform. These integrations can expand your reach and streamline data flow across channels and platforms.
Visitor currently has no verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools or expand its ecosystem. This may challenge hotels that rely on multiple platforms for operations.
Edge: DJUBO, with established partnerships that enhance connectivity and operational flexibility.
DJUBO’s review count (15 in the last six months) and near-perfect overall rating of 5/5 make it the more trusted choice for hoteliers. It is especially popular among independent hotels and multi-property groups, consistently rated highly across segments.
Visitor, with 22 reviews but no recent feedback, receives uniformly positive praise for customer service but lacks the same level of recent validation. Its niche appeal is more prominent among bed & breakfasts and small properties.
Edge: DJUBO, owing to more recent reviews and higher overall ratings among diverse hotel types.
Neither DJUBO nor Visitor provides explicit pricing details; both follow a custom pricing model without freemium options or monthly flat fees. Your hotel will need to contact each provider for tailored quotes.
This lack of transparent pricing emphasizes the importance of evaluating value and features during demos rather than initial costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only needs basic booking and guest management.
Not ideal if your hotel requires automation, advanced revenue management, or extensive reporting features.
DJUBO delivers a comprehensive management experience, suited for hotels aiming to scale or operate multiple properties with complex needs. Its broad feature set, integrations, and recent positive reviews make it a dependable choice for larger or growing hotels.
Visitor offers a simplified, user-friendly platform that works well for small hotels, B&Bs, and properties focused on guest experience over automation. Its high customer service ratings speak to its value for properties valuing simplicity and personal support.
If your hotel demands a full-suite management system with automation and detailed analytics, DJUBO is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is ease of use, quick setup, and core functionalities, Visitor is worth considering.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich solution supported by recent, extensive user reviews, DJUBO stands out as the more reliable, proven option.
HTRの製品データベースによると、DjuboとVisitor Appは22個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| GDPR準拠 | ||
| RevPaRとADRレポート | ||
| ウェブサイトの開発 | ||
| オンラインチェックアウト | ||
| グループ予約エンジン | ||
| ゲストCRM | ||
| ショッピングモジュールを評価する | ||
| ドラッグ&ドロップ テープチャート | ||
| ハウスキーピング | ||
| ユーザーとロールの集中管理 | ||
| 直接請求 | ||
| 自動夜間監査 |
主な違いを表示しています。これらの製品間にはさらに15個の異なる機能があります。
高評価の分野
独自の機能
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。DjuboとVisitor Appは多くの主要なHotel Management Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Djuboは3件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Visitor Appは0件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Djuboは使いやすさで4.9/5対4.9/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Djubo:いいえ。Visitor App:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのHotel Management Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。DJUBOのHT Scoreは0、Visitorは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー