The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
550件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Hiltonのユーザーはを最も評価し、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #60 1件のレビュー | #5 219件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #3 238件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #52 0件のレビュー | #2 46件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #8 7件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #60 1件のレビュー | #5 239件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #3 241件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #56 1件のレビュー | #4 143件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #4 49件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #40 1件のレビュー | #52 4件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #2 384件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #5 111件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #1 21件のレビュー |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can dramatically impact operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Hilton OnQ, a proprietary system built in-house, has been the standard for Hilton’s vast network of over 2,000 properties but struggles with outdated technology and limited recent reviews. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts a strong recent review presence, a higher overall rating, and a broad feature set. Which system truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
The decision ultimately hinges on the scale and needs of your property, your expectations for modern features, and your support requirements. Let’s explore how each compares across critical factors.
Hilton OnQ is designed specifically for Hilton’s brand, offering integration within their ecosystem. Yet, its reviews reveal a significant dissatisfaction around outdated technology, with recent reviews nearly nonexistent. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, has a 4.83/5 rating based on 433 reviews, with 27 recent ratings in the last six months, showing active user feedback.
The core problem both aim to solve involves streamlining operations—reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest data management. Hilton’s system appears to lack innovation, with users calling it “obsolete techno,” while HotelTime is praised for its real-time data, automation, and extensive integrations. Do you prioritize an industry-specific solution or a modern, flexible platform?
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s global brand or operates within their franchise infrastructure, Hilton OnQ might seem like an obvious choice. However, given the lack of recent reviews, poor ratings (0/5 overall), and consistent complaints about outdated tech, it’s clear Hilton OnQ is not keeping pace with modern hotel management needs.
HotelTime PMS suits properties seeking a flexible, cloud-based platform with extensive features, proven scalability, and recent positive feedback. If your hotel wants a comprehensive solution with active support and broad integrations, HotelTime is the clear choice. For boutique or independent hotels, HotelTime’s versatility and ongoing innovation make it the superior solution.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and daily efficiency. Hilton OnQ scores a dismal 1/5 for user-friendliness, with reviews noting the system’s obsolete interface and difficulties managing even basic tasks. Staff spend hours troubleshooting, rather than serving guests.
HotelTime PMS, rated 4.66/5, is praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and management-friendly features. Users say it’s “simple, clear, and easy to learn,” facilitating faster staff training and smoother daily operations. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ offers only basic, proprietary features designed for Hilton properties, with no unique features highlighted. In contrast, HotelTime provides 51 exclusive features such as integrated POS, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, revenue management, and automation tools—features that significantly enhance operational efficiency and guest experience.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set, including real-time reporting, automated night audit, and multi-currency support, makes it a stand-out choice. With more than fifty features uniquely available, HotelTime clearly leads in capability. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton’s support is reported to be lacking, with a rating of 1/5 and reviews emphasizing long hours spent troubleshooting due to poor interface and outdated infrastructure. Complaints include support delays and inability to address core issues effectively.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick, responsive service and dedicated onboarding assistance. Clients appreciate their consistent availability and proactive communication. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ integrates with six verified partners, mostly limited to Hilton’s internal ecosystem and a few third-party vendors like Canary Technologies. Its integration scope is narrow, reflecting its closed, proprietary architecture.
HotelTime PMS offers 58 verified integrations, including popular tools like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, along with core partners like Canary Technologies. Its extensive third-party connectivity supports a more flexible tech stack. Edge: HotelTime.
Given the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Hilton OnQ is rated poorly overall and is virtually unreviewed in the last six months. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews (27 in six months) and 4.83/5 score reflect high satisfaction, especially among properties in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.
HotelTime’s users—ranging from boutique hotels to resorts—report improved operational efficiency and management. Its higher, recent review volume makes it the more trusted choice. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely due to its exclusive use within Hilton properties. This limits direct hotelier access and makes comparison impossible.
HotelTime PMS charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. As a fully cloud-based platform, its transparent pricing makes it accessible across various property sizes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hilton OnQ is a closed, proprietary system tied exclusively to Hilton properties, with outdated technology and very limited recent reviews. Its lack of features and poor user ratings make it unsuitable for independent or modern hotels seeking flexibility.
HotelTime PMS is a cloud-based, versatile platform with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 rating, and 51 unique features. Its active support, broad integrations, and scalability make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to improve operations and guest experiences.
If your hotel is part of Hilton and your priority is brand consistency, Hilton OnQ might seem appealing—but the technology’s limitations and user dissatisfaction suggest otherwise. For most hotels looking for a modern, reliable PMS, HotelTime’s extensive capabilities and proven user satisfaction make it the preferred choice.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Hilton OnQとHotelTime PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Hilton OnQは6件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、HotelTime PMSは58件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対1.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Hilton OnQ:いいえ。HotelTime PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HiltonのHT Scoreは0、HOTELTIMEは92です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー